Personality Traits as the Predictors of Eudaimonic Well-Being in Undergraduates

Year 2024, Issue: 53, 137 - 151, 30.06.2024

Ahmet Erdem Rukiye Şahin Muhammet Fatih Alkan

https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1421847

Abstract

The new approach in positive psychology is growing rich with the acceptance of life in all aspects and with views on the optimal use of human potential; it is being shaped by a new perspective that can be accepted as a full explanation of not only positive emotion but also of sources and motives of positive emotion, and respect for human. One of the predictors of positive emotion is personality traits. Within this scope, this research aimed at exploring the relationship between personality and eudaimonic well-being. A total of 316 undergraduates participated in the study. The data were collected online through the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being and The Big Five Inventory. The findings showed that stability involving agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism significantly affected undergraduates’ eudaimonic well-being. However, plasticity involving extraversion and openness had no significant effect.

Keywords

Eudaimonic well-being, Personality traits, Stability, Plasticity

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Ödomanik İyi-Oluşun Yordayıcıları Olarak Kişilik Özellikleri

Abstract

Pozitif psikolojideki yeni yaklaşım yaşamı tüm yönleriyle kabul ve insan potansiyelinin optimum kullanımına yönelik görüşlerle zenginleşmekte, sadece olumlu duygulanım değil, olumlu duygulanım kaynakları, nedenleri, insana yönelik saygının tam izahı şeklinde kabul edilebilecek yeni bir perspektifle şekillenmektedir. Pozitif duygulanımı yordayıcı değişkenlerden biri kişilik özellikleridir. Bu kapsamda, bu araştırmanın amacı kişilik ile ödomanik iyi-oluş arasındaki ilişkinin test edilmesidir. Çalışmanın katılımcılarını 316 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmuştur. Veriler çevrimiçi olarak Ödomanik İyi-Oluş Ölçeği ve Beş Faktör Kişilik Envanteri aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar, uyumluluk, sorumluluk ve nevrotikliği içeren durağanlığın üniversite öğrencilerinin ödomanik iyi-oluşu üzerinde anlamlı güçlü bir etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Öte yandan, dışadönüklük ve deneyime açıklığı içeren esneklik, ödomanik iyi-oluş üzerinde anlamlı bir etki göstermemiştir.

Keywords

Kişilik özellikleri, Durağanlık, Esneklik, Ödomanik iyi-oluş

References

• Amir Kiaei, Y. (2014). The relationship between metacognition, self-actualization, and well-being among university students: Reviving self-actualization as the purpose of education [PhD thesis]. Florida International University.
• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270-301. doi:10.1177/1094428112470848
• Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
• Arvas, F. B. (2017). Psikolojide ve İslam düşünce geleneğinde mutluluk kavramı: Karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 109-128.
• Aristoteles (2015). Eudomas’a etik (1. Baskı). (S. Babür, Çev.). Ankara, BilgeSu Yayıncılık.
• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & de Vries, R. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 79-91.
• Asquith, S. L., Wang, X., Quintana, D. S., & Abraham, A. (2022). The role of personality traits and leisure activities in predicting wellbeing in young people. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 249.
• Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505-516.
• Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(3), 511-530.
• Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
• Burns, R. A., & Machin, M. A. (2010). Identifying gender differences in the independent effects of personality and psychological well-being on two broad affect components of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(1), 22-27.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). USA: Taylor &Francis.
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668-678.
• Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile yapisal eşitlik modellemesi: Temel kavramlar - uygulamalar - programlama (2. ed., p. 261). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Demirbaş-Çelik, N., & Keklik, İ. (2019). Personality factors and meaning in life: The mediating role of competence, relatedness and autonomy. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20, 995–1013
• Demirtaş, M. (2016). Antik Yunan filozoflarındaki adalet anlayışının islam filozoflarına etkisi. Journal of International Social Research, 9(43), 2435-2449.
• Demirtaş, M. (2017). İslam düşüncesinde “ölçülü ve dengeli olmak” bir değer olarak nasıl ele alınmıştır? Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 191-202.
• DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197-229. DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138.
• DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58.
• DeYoung, C. G., Hasher, L., Djikic, M., Criger, B., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Morning people are stable people: Circadian rhythm and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 267-276.
• DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health?. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 533-552.
• DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005) Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825-858.
• Diener, E. & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(4), 653-663.
• Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. Culture and subjective well-being, 185-218.
• Diener, E., Napa-Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of happiness studies, 1(2), 159-176.
• Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246.
• Durak, N. (2009a). Platon ve Fârâbî felsefesinde erdem kavramı. Fakülte kitabevi.
• Durak, N. (2009b). Aristoteles ve Fârâbî’de etik. Fakülte kitabevi.
• Erdem, A., Şahin, R., Arpacı, İ. ve Alkan, M. F. (2018). Ödomanik İyi Oluş Ölçeği uyarlama çalışması. III. INES Education and Social Science Congress: Abstracts Book (513-514). Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Erdle, S., Irwing, P., Rushton, J. P., & Park, J. (2010). The general factor of personality and its relation to self-esteem in 628,640 internet respondents. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 343–346.
• Farabi (1993). Mutluluk yoluna yöneltme (Tenbîh ‘alâ sebîli’s-sâ’âde). (H. Özcan, Çev.). İzmir, Anadolu Matbaacılık.
• Fowers, B. J. (2016). Aristotle on eudaimonia: On the virtue of returning to the source. In Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 67-83). Springer, Cham.
• Gale, C. R., Booth, T., Mõttus, R., Kuh, D., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Neuroticism and Extraversion in youth predict mental wellbeing and life satisfaction 40 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 687-697.
• Garcia, D. (2011). Two models of personality and well-being among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1208-1212.
• Gomez, V., Krings, F., Bangerter, A., & Grob, A. (2009). The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 345-354.
• Gomez, V., Allemand, M., & Grob, A. (2012). Neuroticism, extraversion, goals, and subjective well-being: Exploring the relations in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 317-325.
• Grant, S., Langan-Fox, J., & Anglim, J. (2009). The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychological reports, 105(1), 205-231.
• Hanley, A. W., Baker, A. K., & Garland, E. L. (2018). The mindful personality II: Exploring the metatraits from a cybernetic perspective. Mindfulness, 9(3), 972-979.
• Heylighen, F. (1992). A cognitive‐systemic reconstruction of Maslow's theory of self‐actualization. Behavioral Science, 37(1), 39-58.
• Işık, A., & Meriç, M. (2010). Hayatın kalitesi (quality of life) kavramının felsefik temelleri; Aristo, Bentham ve Nordenfelt. Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(1), 421-434.
• İbn-i Haldun (2016). Mukaddime (2. Basım). (Yayına Hazırlayan: Arslan Tekin), İstanbul: İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
• Jones, A., & Crandall, R. (1986). Validation of a short index of self-actualization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12(1), 63-73.
• Johansloo, M. (2014). Eastern conceptualizations of happiness: Fundamental differences with western views. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 475-493.
• Karagöz, Y. (2015), SPSS 22 uygulamali biyoistatistik, Güncellenmiş 2. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Karagöz, Y. (2016), SPSS ve AMOS Uygulamalı İstatistiksel Analizler, Güncellenmiş 2. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Kitayama, S., & Park, H. (2007). Cultural shaping of self, emotion, and well‐being: How does it work? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 202-222.
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
• Kokko, K., Tolvanen, A., & Pulkkinen, L. (2013). Associations between personality traits and psychological well-being across time in middle adulthood. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 748-756.
• Lamers, S. M., Westerhof, G. J., Kovács, V., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 517-524.
• Lü, W., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2014). Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and happiness, PA and NA. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 128-133.
• Lyubomirsky, S., & Kurtz, J. (2013). Positively Happy: Routes to Sustainable Happiness; a Six Week Course. Positive Acorn.
• Mann, F. D., DeYoung, C. G., Tiberius, V., & Krueger, R. F. (2020). Stability and well‐being: Associations among the Big Five domains, metatraits, and three kinds of well‐being in a large sample. Journal of Personality.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
• Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (Revised by R. Frager, J. Fadiman, C. McReynolds & R. Cox). NY: Harper & Row.
• Mckay, F. (2016). Eudaimonia and culture: The Anthropology of cirtue. In Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (pp. 409-425). Springer, Cham.
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1991). Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 227-232.
• Michalos, A. C., & Robinson, S. R. (2012). The good life: Eighth century to third century BCE. In Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 23-61). Springer, Dordrecht.
• Naess, A. (1995). Self-realization. An ecological approach to being in the world. In deep ecology for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 225-239), Boston and London Shambhala.
• Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well‐being. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 157-184.
• Oishi, S. (2000). Goals as cornerstones of subjective well-being: Linking individuals and cultures. Culture and subjective well-being, 87-112.
• Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well- being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1674-1682.
• Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2003). Culture and well-being: The cycle of action, evaluation, and decision. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 939-949.
• Osmanoğlu, Ö. (undated). Metafizik ve ahlakla ilişkisi bakimindan ortaçağ islam siyaset düşüncesi. DEM Dergi, 2(5), 106-111.
• Özgen, M. K. (1997). Farabi'de mutluluk ve ahlak ilişkisi. İstanbul: İnsan yayınları.
• Peterson, J. B. (2002). Maps of meaning: The architecture of belief. Routledge.
• Proctor, C., & Tweed, R. (2016). Measuring eudaimonic well-being. In Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 277-294). Springer, Cham.
• Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: A review of general semantics, 249-260.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
• Ryan, R. M., & Martela, F. (2016). Eudaimonia as a way of living: Connecting Aristotle with self-determination theory. In Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 109-122). Springer, Cham.
• Ryff, C. D. (1989a). Beyond Ponce de Leon and life satisfaction: New directions in quest of successful ageing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12(1), 35-55.
• Ryff, C. D. (1989b). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
• Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99-104.
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of happiness studies, 9(1), 13-39.
• Ryff, C. D. (2016). Beautiful ideas and the scientific enterprise: Sources of intellectual vitality in research on eudaimonic well-being. In Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being (pp. 95-107). Springer, Cham.
• Sarubin, N., Wolf, M., Giegling, I., Hilbert, S., Naumann, F., Gutt, D., ... & Bühner, M. (2015). Neuroticism and extraversion as mediators between positive/negative life events and resilience. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 193-198.
• Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. B. (2015). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Psychology Press.
• Seligman, M. E. (2004). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Simon and Schuster.
• Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
• Strickhouser, J. E., Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2017). Does personality predict health and well-being? A metasynthesis. Health Psychology, 36(8), 797–810.
• Sümer, N., & Sümer, H.C. (2005). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ölçeği (Yayınlanmamış çalışma).
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2014). Higher order structure of personality and mental health: Does general affectivity matter? Journal of personality assessment, 96(2), 226-236.
• Şimşek, Ö. F., & Koydemir, S. (2013). Linking metatraits of the big five to well-being and ill-being: do basic psychological needs matter? Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 221-238.
• Şimşek, Ö. F., Koydemir, S., & Schütz, A. (2012). A multigroup multitrait-multimethod study in two countries supports the validity of a two-factor higher order model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(4), 442-449.
• Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
• Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441-456.
• Vittersø, J. (2004). Subjective well-being versus self-actualization: Using the flow-simplex to promote a conceptual clarification of subjective quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 299-331.
• Vittersø, J., Søholt, Y., Hetland, A., Thoresen, I. A., & Røysamb, E. (2010). Was Hercules happy? Some answers from a functional model of human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 95(1), 1-18.
• Vittersø, J. (2016). The most important idea in the world: An introduction. In Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 1-24). Springer, Cham.
• Waterman, A. S. (1984). The psychology of individualism. New York: Praeger.
• Waterman, A. S. (1990a). The relevance of Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia for the psychological study of happiness. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), 39-44.
• Waterman, A. S. (1990b). Personal expressiveness: Philosophical and psychological foundations. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11(1), 47-73.
• Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678-691.
• Waterman, A. S. (2005). When effort is enjoyed: Two studies of intrinsic motivation for personally salient activities. Motivation and Emotion, 29(3), 165-188.
• Waterman, A. S. (2007). On the importance of distinguishing hedonia and eudaimonia when contemplating the hedonic treadmill. American Psychologist, 62, 612– 613.
• Waterman, A. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist's perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234-252.
• Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 41-79.
• Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Ravert, R. D., Williams, M. K., Bede Agocha, V., ... & Brent Donnellan, M. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41-61.
• Wilmot, M. P., DeYoung, C. G., Stillwell, D., & Kosinski, M. (2016). Self-monitoring and the metatraits. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 335–347.
• Zhang, J. W., & Howell, R. T. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits?. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1261-1266.