Monetary Valuation of Carbon Storage of the Forests: A Case of the Örümcek Forest in Turkey

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 31 - 40, 26.06.2020

Batuhan Ateş Yımaz Mehmet Mısır

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.720775

Abstract

Global climate change has become more important than ever in last decades. Increased concentration of greenhouse gases (e.g. methane, carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, etc.) in the atmosphere is considered as the primary cause of global warming which impacts and changes the global climate. Among the greenhouse gases, the effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) on global warming is significantly higher than any other greenhouse gases mainly due to its abundance in the atmosphere. It has been determined by the international global climate organizations that the most effective way to combat climate change is to reduce the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Forests as terrestrial ecosystems have an important role in the storage of CO2. In recent decades, the importance of the carbon storage capacity of the forests has been increasing regarding with economic value of carbon storage function. Therefore, the monetary valuation of the carbon stored by the forests has become an extremely important issue. In this study, it was aimed to calculate the carbon storage capacity of a sample forest and estimate its economic value. The study was implemented in Örümcek Forest Enterprise Chief (FEC) located in the city of Gümüşhane in Turkey. The amount of carbon storage was calculated by using the allometric carbon models previously developed for tree species exist in the study area. Then, the economic value of carbon storage was estimated based on the amount of forest products extracted from the FEC between 2005 and 2017, the unit sale prices of the products, and total costs of associated activities over the years. The results indicated that the economic value of carbon stored by the forests was found to be 40.2 TRY per ton. Even though this value cannot be generalized and it is valid specifically for the forest and economic conditions in Örümcek FEC, the results in general highlight the significance of the carbon storage capacity of the forests in terms of their economic assess, which is important for the forestry sector in many countries as well as in Turkey.

Keywords

Valuation of carbon storage, Ecosystem services, Climate change, Örümcek Forest

Thanks

I would like to thank to the Forestry Management and Planning Department in General Directorate of Forestry for their contributions.

References

• Bereiter, B., Eggleston, S., Schmitt, J., Nehrbass-Ahles, C., Stocker, T.F., Fischer, H., Kipfstuhl, S., Chappellaz, J., 2015. Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO2 record from 800 to 600 kyr before present. Geophysical Research Letters. 42(2): 542-549.
• Bülbül, E., 2012. Estimation of Carbon Stock in Pure Spruce Stands of Education and Research Forest, K.T.U. MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. 45 p.
• Erkut, S., (2013). Capacity of Carbon Stock in Pure Beech Stands of Giresun Forest District Directorate Akkuş Forest Enterprise. MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. 75 p.
• Görücü, Ö., 2001. Modern Production Planning Approaches in Forest Enterprises and New Business Models, 1. National Forestry Congress, Foresters Association of Turkey, Ankara.
• Guner, T.S., Comez, A., 2017. Biomass Equations and Changes in Carbon Stock in Afforested Black Pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. Subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe) Stands in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(3):2368-2379.
• Gülsunar, M., 2011. Remote Sensing Method for Forest Carbon Capacity Estimation (The Example of Düzdağ Forest Management Chiefdom). MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon. 87 p.
• Güngör, M., Saygı, N., Polat, A., Çaycı, D., Tekin, A., 2010. Green Informatics. Information Technologies and Communication Authority, Sectoral Research and Strategies Department. http://www.tk.gov.tr/ Yayin/Raporlar/2010/Yesil_Bilisim_SAS_TEMMUZ_2010.pdf , 110 p.
• Hamrick, K., Gallant, M., 2017. Unlocking potential: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2017, Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington DC. 42 p.
• ICAP, 2019. Emissions Trading Worldwide: Status Report 2019. Berlin: ICAP. 12 p.
• IPCC, 2001. Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry, Summary for Policymakers. A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 30 p.
• Kadioglu, M., 2004. Küressel Isınma Söyleşileri. https://www.hkmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/6a38989dc7e433f_ek.pdf
• Ketizmen, B., 2011. Investigations and Functional Comparisons on Carbon Economics in Kahramanmaraş Başkonuş Research Forest, MSc Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, 94 p.
• Makineci, E., Çalışkan, S., Yılmaz, H., Özdemir, E., Kumbaşlı, M., Yılmaz, E., 2011. Determination of health status, biomass, carbon storage and fanatic properties in North Thrace grove bond oak ecosystems, TÜBİTAK-TOVAG Project Report, No: 107O750, 276 p.
• Masiero, M., Pettenella, D., Boscolo, M., Barua, S.K, Animon, I., Matta, J.R., 2019. Valuing forest ecosystem services: a training manual for planners and project developers. Forestry Working Paper No. 11. Rome, FAO. 216 pp. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
• Mısır, M., Köse, S., Yavuz, H., Mısır, N., Altun, L., Karahalil, U., 2011. Determining Carbon Storage Capacity of Karadeniz Technical University Education and Research Forest and Transferring to Forest Management Plan, Scientific Research Project, Trabzon.
• Mısır, M., Mısır, N., Erkut, S. 2012. Estimations of Total Ecosystem Biomass and Carbon Storage for Fir (Abies nordmanniana S. Subsp. bornmülleriana (Mattf.)) Forests (Western Black Sea Region), Kastamonu University Journal of Forestry Faculty, IUFRO SE. 60-64.
• Mısır, M., Mısır, N., Ülker, C., Erkut, S., 2013. Determination of the carbon storage amount of pure Beech stands (Example of Trabzon Regional Directorate of Forestry), Scientific Research Project, Trabzon.
• NOAA/ESRL, 2013. Dr. Pieter Tans, NOAA/ESRL. www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ Reuters, T., 2018. Carbon market monitor 12 January 2018, Thomson Reuters Commodities Research and Forecasts.
• TUIK, 2018. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Statistics, 1990 – 2018. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara. Turkey. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1019.
• Türkeş, M., Sümer, U.M., Çetiner, G., 2000. Flexibility Mechanisms Under the Kyoto Protocol, Installation Journal, 52: 84-100.
• UNFCCC, 2012. Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its eighth session, held in Doha from 26 November to 8 December, Addendum, Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its eighth session.
• Yavuz, H., Mısır, N., M., Tüfekçioğlu, A., Karahalil, U., 2010. Development of Mechanical Growth Models, Determination of Biomass and Carbon Storage Amounts for Pure and Mixed Scotch Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Stands in the Black Sea Region, TÜBİTAK-TOVAG Project Report, No: 106O274, Ankara.
• Yilmaz, B.A., 2018. Economic Analysis of Carbon Storage Amounts of Forests (Örümcek Enterprise Chief Sample). MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.