Determining the Appropriate Tool for In-Stand Debarking with Analytical Hierarchy Process

Year 2022, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 85 - 92, 30.12.2022

Mehmet Eker

https://doi.org/10.33904/ejfe.1216881

Abstract

The bark of logs from coniferous trees is mostly debarked in the stand or roadside. At the terminal points, storages, and mills industrial debarking machines have been operated for debarking of timber, as well. In recent time chainsaw mounted debarking apparatus (C-Debarker), axe, and a new tool that is brushcutter mounted debarking apparatus (B-Debarker) have been used for peeling barks in-stand. Debarking process is very time-consuming work phase within the total time for unit of wood procurement. In order to save operation time and to minimize unit costs for the operation, the logging operators have to make a difficult decision on suitable tools for debarking. The purpose of this study is to determine a procedure that helps to select the appropriate tool in-stand debarking of timber logs. In addition to the axe and C-Debarker, traditionally used in debarking, the recently developed peeling tool B-Debarker has been evaluated in terms of various criteria and compared with other methods. In multi-criteria analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been used to describe the appropriate tool. The criteria set are based on technically appropriate, economically viable, environmentally friendly, and socially acceptable debarking tool and operation. While the application potential of C-Debarker is high in terms of operational efficiency, the B-Debarker offers high potential in terms of ergonomics. On the other hand, it has been determined that the axe is a preferable tool for ease of use and accessibility.

Keywords

In-stand debarking, Debarkers, Log debarkers, Axe, Brush cutter, Technology selection, AHP

References

• Baroth, R. 2005. Literature review of the latest development of wood debarking. University of Oulu Control Engineering Laboratory, Report A-No: 27, 32 p.
• BASEH, 2022. Tree Bark Peeling Apparatus. Bahtiyar Motor Sanayi Ltd. Şti., İzmir. http://www.baseh.com/v/category/106-kabuk-soyma-aparatlari.html (Accessed: 18 November 2022)
• Chahal, A., Ciolkosz, D., Puri, V., Jacobson, M., Liu, J. 2021. Mechanical characteristics of wood-bark interface of shrub willow. Industrial Crops & Products, 162: 113236
• Çağlar, S. 2021. Work efficiency and physical workload during the manual debarking of Scotch pine trees. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 32(3): 246-255.
• Eker, M. 2004. Development of Annual Operational Planning Model for Timber Harvesting. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Trabzon, p. 239.
• Eker, M., Çoban, H. O., Acar, H.H. 2011. Time study and productivity analysis of chainsaw mounted log debarker in southern pine forests of Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 2146-2156.
• Eker, M., Özer, D. 2015. Selection of debarking technique for pine logs in cut-to-length harvesting method. Proceedings of the 48th International FORMEC Symposium: 4-8 October, Linz, Austria, pp.123-128.
• Eker, M., Çoban, H. O. 2019. The Relationship Between Forest Operations and Climate Change. International Conferences on Climate Change and Forestry, November 13-14, Antalya, Türkiye.
• Eker, M., Şefik, M., 2019. Developing and testing of a debarking tool (moto-debarker) mounted to brushcutter. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 20(4): 411-420.
• Enez, K., Nalbantoğlu, S.S. 2019. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 70: 51-57.
• Engür, M.O. 1996. Choice of Technology and Possibilities of mechanization in Harvesting Wood in Turkey. PhD Thesis, İstanbul University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İstanbul, p.162.
• Erdaş, O., Acar, H.H., Eker, M. 2014. Transportation Techniques for Forest Products. Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Publication No: 233/39, Trabzon, 504 p.
• Grammel, R. 1988. Holzernte und Holztansport. Verlag Paul Parey- Hamburg und Berlin.
• Gülci, N., Akay, A. E., Erdaş, O. 2017. Productivity assessment of alternative timber debarking methods. Šumarski List, 9(10): 469–476.
• Gürtan, H. 1969. Die arbetitsleistungen verschiedener axte und schaleisen bei der entrindung, Forestry Research Institute in Ankara, Tech. Bull., Publication No:38, 66p.
• Heppelmann, J.B., Labelle, E.R., Wittkopf, S., Seeling, U. 2019. In-stand debarking with the use of modified harvesting heads: a potential solution for key challenges in European forestry. Eur J Forest Res, 138:1067–1081.
• Murphy, G. 2020. In-forest debarking: a review of the literatüre. GE Murphy & Associates Ltd., Programme: Harvesting and Logistics, No: H044, New Zealand.
• Nemestothy, S., Grabner, M. 2021. Austrian logging: a historical account of the time of felling and debarking, and transportation practices. International Journal of Wood Culture, 1:180–195.
• Önal, Y.E. 2012. Investigation on The Energy Consumption, Emission, and Noise Impacts of Harvesting Operation Technology. Master Thesis, Süleyman Demirel University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Isparta, TR
• Öztürk, E. 2022. Comparison of Some Debarking Tools in terms of Productivity and Debarking Quality. Master Thesis, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, The Institute of Graduate Education, Isparta, TR
• Pieagi, F. 1996. Scortecciare il legname in bosco: una macchina portatile da impiegare sul letto di caduta. SHERWOOD- Foresle e Alberi Oggi, 9:27-31.
• Roszkowska, E. 2013. Rank ordering criteria weighting methods–a comparative overview. Optimum Studia Ekonomiczne NR, 5(65): 14-33.
• Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International, New York, NY, U.S.A.
• Saaty, T.L. 2000. Fundamentals of decision-making and priority theory with AHP. RWS Publications, Pittsburg.
• Saaty, T. L., Vargas, L. G. 2006. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process: Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-33859-4.
• Şefik, M. 2019. Developing and Testing of A Debarking Tool Mounted To Brushcutter. Master Thesis, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, The Institute of Graduate Education, Isparta, TR
• Yan, T., Zhu, J., Yang, K., Yu, L., Zhang, J. 2017. Nutrient removal on the different harvesting scenarios for larch plantations in northeast China: implications for nutrient conservation and management. For Ecol Manag, 400: 150–158.