<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>eku</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Journal of Theory and Practice in Education</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1304-9496</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17244/eku.1564103</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Science Education</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Fen Bilgisi Eğitimi</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>Preservice Science Teachers’ Metaphorical Perceptions Related to “Technology” Concept</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının “Teknoloji” Kavramıyla İlgili Metaforik Algıları</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2277-6016</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Özergun Köse</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ilgım</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2793-8387</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Timur</surname>
                                    <given-names>Betül</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ÇANAKKALE ONSEKİZ MART ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20241231">
                    <day>12</day>
                    <month>31</month>
                    <year>2024</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>20</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>46</fpage>
                                        <lpage>57</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20241009">
                        <day>10</day>
                        <month>09</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20241221">
                        <day>12</day>
                        <month>21</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2005, Journal of Theory and Practice in Education</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2005</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Journal of Theory and Practice in Education</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>How preservice science teachers perceive technology is significant because we cannot think science and technology separately. Using metaphors is one of the method helps to examine how a concept, technology in this contect, is perceive. A metaphor can be defined as the process of defining a less known concept  by using a more known concept and explaining why it is defined that way. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to examine preservice science teachers’ metaphorical perceptions related to the technology concept. This study was conducted with 110 volunteer undergraduate preservice science teachers from a state university in Western Türkiye. As a methodology, phenomenology was selected from qualitative research. For data collection process, participants fill in the blanks: “technology looks like ………….. because ………..”. Data was analyzed by using content analysis. All collected data was categorized as positive (N=83), negative(N=15), and neutral(N=12) in the first phase. Positive codes were found as useful, developing, changing, need, unlimited, helpful, valuable, source of information, facilitating, enlightening, widespreading and guiding. Negative codes were found as addictive, harmful, and endless. Lastly, neutral codes were found as balance and variability. According to the general findings of this study, preservice science teachers’ perceptions related to the technology was mostly positive. However, negative perceptions relied on addictiveness of technology can be harmful. Preservice science teachers’ neutral perceptions both expressed negative and positive sides of the technology. By considering the technology integration in education, it is thought that examining preservice science teachers’ metaphorical perceptions are important and more studies need for the future.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Günümüzde fen bilgisi ve teknolojiyi birbirinden ayrı düşünemeyiz. Bu sebeple geleceğin fen bilgisi öğretmenlerin teknoloji ile ilgili algılarının incelenmesi önemlidir. Algılarının incelenme yöntemi olarak metaforlar kullanılmıştır. Metafor daha az bilinen bir kavramı bilinen bir kavramı kullanarak tanımlama ve neden bu şekilde tanımlandığını açıklama sürecidir. Bu sebeple bu araştırmada fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının “teknoloji” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algılarının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma Türkiye’nin batı bölgesinde bir devlet üniversitende öğrenim görmekte olan fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarıyla yürütülmüştür. Çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılmak isteyen 1., 2., 3., ve 4. sınıf olmak üzere  toplamda 119 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Çalışmanın yöntemi olgubilim (fenomenoloji) seçilmiştir. Araştırmanın veri toplama sürecinde “teknoloji” kavramına yönelik metaforik algılarının belirlenmesi amacıyla “teknoloji ……. gibidir, çünkü ………” ifadesini tamamlamaları istenmiştir. İfadede yer alan veriler içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda ortaya çıkan 74 kavram, olumlu, olumsuz ve nötr metaforik algılar olarak kategorilere ayrılmıştır. Bu kavramların 56sı olumlu, 7si olumsuz ve 10u nötr olarak kategorileşmiştir. Daha sonra bu ayrılan kategorilerin kendi içerisinde kodları bulunmuştur. Olumlu kodlar yararlı, gelişen, değişen, ihtiyaç, sınırsız, yardımcı, değerli, bilgi kaynağı, kolaylaştıran, aydınlatan, yaygınlaştıran ve yön veren olarak kodlara ayrılmıştır. Olumsuz kodlar ise bağımlılık olarak kodlanmıştır. Nötr olan algılar ise hem iyi hem kötü olarak kodlanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın bulgularının geleceğin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknolojiyle ilgili metaforik algılarını yansıttığı düşünülmektedir. Teknolojinin eğitimdeki önemi düşünüldüğünde, gelecekte de teknoloji kavramına yönelik metaforik algılarının incelenme çalışmalarının sürdürülmesinin önemli olduğu düşünülmektedir.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>metaphorical perception</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  preservice science teachers</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  technology</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>metaforik algı</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  teknoloji</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arık, S. &amp; Yilmaz, M. (2017). Fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının çevre sorunlarına yönelik tutumları ve çevre 	kirliliğine yönelik metaforik algıları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(3), 1147-1164.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arslan, M. M. &amp; Bayrakçı, M. (2006). Metaforik düşünme ve öğrenme yaklaşımının eğitim-öğretim açısından	 incelenmesi. Millî Eğitim, 35(171), 100-108
Balkan Kiyici, F. (2018). Primary School Students&#039; Perceptions of Technology. Malaysian Online Journal of	 Educational Technology, 6(4), 53-66 http://dx.doi.org/10.17220/mojet.2018.04.005</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Batur, Z., &amp; Uygun, K. (2012). İki neslin bir kavram algısı: teknoloji. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler 	Dergisi, 5(1), 74-88.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bilgiç, H. G. (2021). Aday öğretmenlerin eğitim teknolojileri algisi: metafor analizi örneği. Eğitim Teknolojisi 	Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(2), 211-235. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.817529</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Butler, A. C., Marsh, E. J., Slavinsky, J. P., &amp; Baraniuk, R. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive science and 	technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry A Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 2nd 	Ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Culp, K. M., Honey, M., &amp; Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology 	policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279-307. https://doi.org/10.2190/7W71-	QVT2-PAP2-UD</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Durukan, Ü. G., Hacıoğlu, Y. &amp; Usta, N. D. (2016). Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Öğretmeni		Adaylarının “Teknoloji” Algıları. Journal Of Computer And Education Research, 4(7), 24 - 46. 	https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.15212</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dönmez, G. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen bilimleri dersine, bilime, fen bilimlerine öğretmenine ve bilim 	insanına yönelik metaforik algıları ve imajları (Master&#039;s thesis, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Fen 	Bilimleri Enstitüsü).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dönmez-Usta, N., &amp; Ültay, N. (2015). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının “kimya” metaforlarının 	karşılaştırılması üzerine bir çalışma. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2) 163-177.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dönmez Usta, N., Durukan, Ü. G. &amp; Hacıoğlu, Y. (2016). &quot;Technology&quot; perceptions of computer and 	instructional technology teacher candidates . Journal of Computer and Educational Research . 4 (7), 	24-46. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.15212</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Erdoğan, T., &amp; Gök, B. (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının teknoloji kavramına ilişkin algılarının metafor 	analizi yoluyla incelenmesi. In Proceedings of 8th International Educational Technology 	Conference (pp. 1071-1077).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ergün, A., &amp; Kıyıcı, G. (2019). Fen bilgisi öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimine ilişkin metaforik algıları. 	Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(6), 2513-2527. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.340</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology 	integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology 	integration?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. 	https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fraenkel R.J. &amp; Wallen E.N. (2006)  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill, New 	York.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gök, B., &amp; Erdoğan, T. (2010). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ perceptions about concept of 	technology through metaphor analysis. The Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 	9(2), 145–160.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jensen, D. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International	 Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 36-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500104</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kalonde, G., &amp; Mousa, R. (2016). Technology familiarization to preservice teachers: factors that ınfluence 	teacher educators’ technology decisions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(2), 236-	255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515616965</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kennedy, M. J., &amp; Deshler, D. D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning 	disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 289-298. 	https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300406</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koç, M. (2013). Student teachers’ conceptions of technology: a metaphor analysis. Computers &amp; 	Education, 68(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.024</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Korkmaz, F., &amp; Ünsal, S. (2016). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerin ‘‘teknoloji’’kavramına ilişkin metaforik		 algılarının incelemesi/An investigation of preschool teachers’ perceptions on the concept of 		 “technology”. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(35).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Köseoğlu, P. and Soran, H. (2005). Teacher competencies in terms of using equipment in biology lessons. 	Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal , 28(2). 150-158</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lai, J. W., &amp; Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic 	review. Computers &amp; Education, 133(2),27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lane, CA, &amp; Lyle, H.F. (2010). Obstacles and supports related to the use of educational technologies: the role 	of technological expertise, gender, and age. Journal of Computing in Higher Education ,	https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9034-3.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">McKnight, K., O&#039;Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., &amp; Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a 	digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on 	Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org /10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Miles, M. B. &amp; Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook of qualitative data analysis, 2nd edition. 	London: SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ottenbreit–Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., &amp; Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs 	associated with using technology: addressing professional and student needs. Computers &amp; Education, 	55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of 	Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and 	Advanced Research, 3(1), 45-47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sahin, I., &amp; Donmez, I. (2018). A metaphor analysis study related to STEM subjects based on middle school 	students’ perceptions. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 4(2), 246-257. 	https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.453629</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith, S. M. (2002). The role of social cognitive career theory in information technology based academic 	performance. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(2), 1535-1556.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sönmez, I. &amp; Özer-Aytekin, K. (2020). Eğitim alanındaki metafor araştırmalarında eğilimler: Bir içerik analizi 	çalışması. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(20), 1-38. 	https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.734592</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Saban, A. (2006). Functions of metaphor in teaching and teacher education: A review essay. Teaching 	Education, 17(4), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210601017386</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Saban, A. (2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. Türk 	Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 281-326.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Taylor, M. Z. (2009). Podcast lectures as a primary teaching technology: Results of a one-year trial. Journal 	of Political Science Education, 5(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160902816249</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ural, E., &amp; Başaran-Uğur, A. R. (2018). The metaphorical perceptions of pre-service teachers about the 	science laboratory concept. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 50-64.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Whelchel, R. J. (1986). Is technology neutral?. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 5(4), 3-8.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Woodard, B. S. (2003). Technology and the constructivist learning environment: implications for teaching 	information literacy skills. Research Strategies 19(3-4), 181-192 	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resstr.2005.01.001</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şanal, S. Ö. (2022). Özel eğitim öğretmenleri ve teknoloji: bir metafor analizi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi 	Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 16(1), 64-87. 	https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.887466
Wang, C. H., Ke, Y. T., Wu, J. T., &amp; Hsu, W. H. (2012). Collaborative action research on technology 	integration for science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 125-132. 	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9289-0</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yanarates, E., &amp; Yilmaz, A. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının “çevre duyarlılığı” kavramına yönelik metaforik 	algıları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(3), 1019-1050. 	https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.699406</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yıldırım, A. &amp; Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (7th ed.). Seçkin 	Publishing House: Ankara.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zorluoğlu, S. L., Yapucuoğlu, m. D., &amp; Aladak, k. B. D. (2021). Change of teachers&#039;metaphors towards stem 	and 21st century skills with stem course. Mojes: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational 	Sciences, 9(3), 1-11.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
