SPIRAL DESIGN OF MICROSCOPE IN BOTH TURKISH SCIENCE CURRICULUM AND TURKISH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM

Year 2016, Volume: 4 , 276 - 283, 01.09.2016

Ramazan Çeken

Abstract

Reflection, refraction,
light,
mirror and lens are needed terms for effective learning on microscope. It
mainly depends on reflection and refraction. Students need to engage such
scientific terms before the microscope practices.  Therefore, this study investigates the
contents related to the microscope in accordance with spiral curriculum.  For an overall looking to microscope content in Turkish Science
Curriculum (TSC), the official documents published by the Ministry of National
Education were analyzed at part of reflection, refraction, light,
mirror and lens. The contents
which were listed in a comparison way used to examine whether there is a
parallelism between such related terms or not. It is obvious that the K-level
curriculum includes microscope. At 4
grade, students make simple observations using this tool. Each part of
microscope are mainly introduced to the children at 6 grade. However it is
clear that light and lens are needed contents to understand
the microscope at 4 grade, lens is
located in TSC at 8 grade. Although light
is located in TSC in accordance with the spiral curriculum design, lens has not
got a similar scope and sequence as it located in curriculum later than
microscope practices. For further learning of such activities, it is absolutely
required to be aware of the fact that lens
and refraction are important basics
for microscope. The result of this study also points out that there is a
similar location between TSC and Turkish Science and Technology Curriculum
(TSTC) in terms of spiral design of microscope use.

Keywords

Science curriculum, microscope, spiral curriculum, lens and refraction

References

• ACSC (Atlantic Canada Science Education). (1998). Foundation for the Atlantic Canada Science Curriculum. New Nouveau Brunswick: Department of Education Curriculum Development Branch. ACSC (Atlantic Canada Science Education). (2002). Science 4 Curriculum. Foundation for the Atlantic Canada Science Curriculum. New Nouveau Brunswick: Department of Education Educational Programs & Service Branch. ACSC (Atlantic Canada Science Curriculum). (2005). You and Your World Curriculum Kindergarten-Grade 2. New Nouveau Brunswick: Department of Education Curriculum Development Branch. Blatt, F. S. (1986). Principles of Physics. (Second Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Bobbitt, F. (1918). The Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education (Fifth Edition). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. Bruner, J. (2003). The Process of Education (Twenty-Seventh Printing). USA: Harvard University Press. Dickerson, J., & Kubasko, D. (2007). Digital microscopes: Enhancing collaboration and engagement in science classrooms with information technologies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(4), 279-292. Doll, W. E. (1993). A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia University. Duco, A. (2008). Sciences De La Vie De La Terre. Paris: Belin. Frankel, J. R. & Wallen, E. N. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Sixth Edition). Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies. Gough, A. (1998). Curriculum Toward New Identities. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Beyond Eurocentrism in Science Education: Promises an Problematics from a Feminist Poststructuralist Perspective (pp. 185-209). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. New York: State University of New York Press. NRC. (2008). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards (Tenth Printing). Washington D.C.:National Research Council. Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative Research in Education (Second Edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc. Loughran, J., Smith, K., & Berry, A. (2011). Scientific Literacy Under the Microscope. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://www.sensepublishers.com/files/9789460915284PR.pdf, 15.07.2011 Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research (Second Edition). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc. MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). (2005a). İlköğretim 4 ve 5. Sınıflar Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuzu. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü. MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). (2005b). Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı. Ankara: Okul Öncesi Eğitimi Genel Müdürlüğü. MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı). (2007). İlköğretim 6. Sınıflar Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmen Kılavuz Kitabı. Ankara: Pasifik Yayınları. MEB (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2008). İlköğretim 7 Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretmen Kılavuz Kitabı. Ankara:İmpress. MEB (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara: MEB Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Erdmann, D. B., Clayton, S. R. & Denk, J. P. (2008). The Science of Microbes. Houston: Baylor College of Medicine. http://www.bioedonline.org/resources/files/TSO_Mic_02_s.pdf, 14.027.2011. NSES. (2010). National Science Education Standards. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M, Slattery, P. & Taubman, P. M. ( 2008). Understanding curriculum:An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (Seventh Printing). New York: Peter Lang. Schraer, W. D. & Stoltze, H. J. (1990). Biology (Revised Third Edition). Needham, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Serway, R. A. (1992). Physics for Scientists and Enginners (Third Edition-Updated Version). Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing. Smith, E. T. (1959). Exploring Biology (Fifth Edition). New York, Atlanta, Dallas, Burlingame: Harcourt, Braca & World, Inc. WSEALR (Washington State Essential Academic Learning Requirement). (2005). K-10 Grade Level Expectations: A New Level of Specificity. Washington D. C.: Office of Superintended of Public Instruction WSSS (Washington State Science standards). (2009). Revised Washington State K-12 Science Standards. (Ed. Randy I. Dorn). Washington: Superintendent of Public Istruction. Yeşilyurt, S. (2005). Biyoloji Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Laboratuar Uygulamalarında Karşılaştıkları Güçlüklerin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 88-96.