The Influence of Indirect Corrective Feedback on the Linguistic Accuracy of Adjectival Clauses in an EFL Context
Abstract
The goal of this research was to find out which corrective feedback technique would be most
effective in some EFL context. Concisely, we wanted to find out whether the feedback techniques commonly
used in this context (namely indirect feedback and oral meta-linguistic explanation) were structure-, learner-,
and task-dependent. We chose to experiment with all the functional uses of one linguistic structure, namely
adjective clauses. Whereas the experimental group received two types of feedback (indirect coded written
corrective feedback and oral meta-linguistic feedback), the control group received no corrective feedback at all
on the targeted features. Findings showed that the experimental group’s linguistic accuracy in using adjectival
clauses improved far better than that of the control group. However, this improvement, quite expectedly,
declined gradually over the course of time; hence the experimental group’s linguistic accuracy was a little better
on the immediate posttest than on the delayed post-test. Our argument was that a combination of indirect
feedback and meta-linguistic explanation would be rewarding for adult learners with low-proficiency levels
probably because such feedback techniques require them to exert maximum cognitive, especially when getting
engaged in a problem-solving process.
Keywords
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 23, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 28 |
