Evidence of Combined Site Effects and Foundatıon-Soil-Structure Interaction Effects on Seismic Response of Rc Buildings

Year 2020, Volume: 11, 77 - 88, 31.12.2020

Mohamed Beneldjouzı Mohamed Hadıd Nasser Laouamı

Abstract

The seismic excitation experienced by structures is a function of earthquake source effects, travel path effects, local site effects, and soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects. SSI effects related to variation of the structural behavior recently became a common practice in structural seismic design. Building seismic codes usually consider site effects through site factors, which reflect amplification of seismic waves due to the change in the geological contrast. For seismic structural analysis purposes, however, they consider the assumption of a fixed base, where, the input motion at the base of the structure is taken as equal to the free field ground motion. This paper investigates, in a rational way, the influence of kinematic and inertial SSI effects combined to local soil conditions effects on RC multistory buildings, resting on different design sites, through a global explicit transfer function for lateral component of the response. It comes from the combination of the transfer functions of structure, foundation and soil. It was found that the approach allows capturing the realistic physical fluctuations of the rock input motion before it excites the superstructure.

Keywords

Soil-structure interaction, Site effects, Transfer function, RC buildings

References

• Allison, S.H., Wu, W.H., & Borja, R.I., (1194). Structural control considering soil-structure interaction effects. Earthquake Engineering And Structural Dynamics, 23, 609-626.
• Beneldjouzi, M., & Laouami, N., (2015). Stochastic based approach for a new site classification method: application to the Algerian seismic code. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14, 663-681.
• Beneldjouzi, M., Laouami, N., & Slimani, A., (2017). Numerical and random simulation procedure for a preliminary local site characterization and site factor assessing. Earthquake and Structures, 13(1) 79-87.
• Benouar, D., (1994). The seismicity of Algeria and adjacent regions. Annali Di Geofisica, 37, 459–862.
• Bouhadad, Y., & Laouami, N., (2002). Earthquake Hazard assessment in the Oran region (northwest Algeria). Natural hazards, 26, 227–243.
• Elsabee, F., & Morray, J.P., (1977). Dynamic behavior of embedded foundations. Rep. No. R77-33, Dept. of Civ. Eng, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
• Karapetrou, S.T., Fotopoulou, S.D., & Pitilakis, K.D., (2015). Seismic vulnerability assessment of high-rise non-ductile RC buildings considering soil–structure interaction effects. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 73:42–57.
• Kausel, E., (1974). Forced vibrations of circular foundations on layered media. Rep. No. R74-11, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
• Kausel, E., Whitman, A., Murray, J., & Elsabee, F., (1978) The spring method for embedded foundations. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 48, 377-392.
• Laouami, N., & Slimani. A., (2013). Earthquake induced site effect in the Algiers–Boumerdes Region: Relation between Spectral Ratios Higher Peaks and observed damage during the May 21st Mw 6.8 Boumerdes earthquake (Algeria). Pure and Applied Geophysics, 170(11), 1785-1801.DOI 10.1007/s00024-012-0612-3.
• Lin, Y.Y., & Miranda, E., (2008). Kinematic soil-structure interaction effects on maximum inelastic displacement demands of SDOF systems. Bull Earthquake Eng.6, 241–259.
• Prasad, A.M., (1989). Studies of soil structure and fluid structure interaction. Ph D Thesis, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
• RPA99, (2003 version). Règles Parasismiques Algériennes. D.T.R. –B.C. 2.48. Centre National de Recherche appliquée en génie parasismique (CGS), Rue Kaddour
• Rahim, BP 252, Hussein Dey, Alger, Algerie. Imprimé par l’Office Nationale des Publications Universitaires (OPU). ISBN 9961-923-13-8.
• Sayyadpour, H., Behnamfar, F. & Hesham El Naggar, M., (2016). The near-field method: a modified equivalent linear method for dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis. Part II: verification and example application. Bull Earthquake Eng., 14, 2385–2404.DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-9871-1.
• Seed, H.B., & Idriss, I.M., (1970). Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. earthquake engineering research center, Report N°. EERC 70-10, University of California, Berkeley, California.
• Seed, H.B., & Sun, J.H., (1989) Implication of Site Effects in the Mexico City Earthquake of September 19, 1985 for Earthquake-resistance-design Criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Report N°. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, California.
• Stewart, J.P., Seed, R.B. & Fenves, G.L., (1999a). Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings I: Analytical aspects. Journal Geotechnical and Geo environmental Engineering, 125, 26-37.
• Wong, H.L., & Luco, J.E., (1985). Dynamic interaction between rigid foundations in a layered half space. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5, 3, 149-158.
• Wu, W.H., (1992). Soil-structure interaction effects of simple structures supported on rectangular foundations. Master of Science thesis, Rice University, Huston, Texas.
• Zania, & Tsompanakis, (2009). The effect of soil-structure interaction and site effects on dynamic response and stability of earth structures. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Coupled Site and soil-structure Interaction Effects with Application to Seismic Risk Mitigation, Borovets, Bulgaria, 30 August – 3 September 2008, ISBN 978-90-481-2 - (e-book).