PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ

Öz

Paydaş yönetimi ‘İş ve Toplum’ alanında ortaya konulan en önemli yaklaşımlardan biridir. Pazarlama, kurumsal finans ve stratejik yönetim gibi çeşitli alanlarda gerçekleştirilen pek çok çalışmanın hareket noktası olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada ise stratejik yönetim anlayışından hareketle işletme performansının paydaşların tatmin boyutu ile ölçülebileceği ve teorisyenlerin paydaş yönetiminin başarı yolunda hem bir amaç hem de bir araç olduğu konusundaki görüşleri irdelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda teorinin gelişimi, işletmeler için öncelikli paydaş sınıflandırmaları ve bu paydaşların işletme ile ilişkileri boyutunda çeşitli stratejiler ele alınmakta, kurulan ilişkinin kalitesi doğrultusunda da hem işletme hem de paydaşlar açısından karşılıklı değerdeki artışa yönelik önermeler konu edilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Paydaş, Paydaş Yönetimi, Stratejik Yönetim

References

1. ANDRIOF, Jörg; (2002), Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement, Warwick Business School, S. Waddock: Boston College Carroll School of Management Greenleaf Publishing, Boston, 32s.
2. BARNEY, Jay; (1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Addison- Wesley Reading, MA, 314s.
3. BERMAN Shawn.; Andrew WICKS ve Thomas M. JONES; (1999) “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between stakeholder Management models and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 488-506.
4. BRADLEY, Mitchell; Mitchell RONALD ve Jeffrey SONNENFELD; (1999) “Who Matters To CEO’s? An Investigation Of Stakeholder Attributes And Salience, Corporate Performance And CEO Values”, Academy Of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 507-525.
5. CLARKSON, Max B. E.; (1995) “A Stakeholder Framework for Analizing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance” Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 92-117.
6. CLEMENT, Ronald; (2005) “The Lessons From Stakeholder Theory For U.S. Business Leaders” İnternet adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science_ ob, Erişim tarihi: 11.05.2006
7. DONALDSON, Thomas; (1999), “Making Stakeholder Theory Whole”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 237-241.
8. DONALDSON, Thomas ve Lee. E. PRESTON; (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 65-91.

9. DRISCOLL, Cathy ve Mark STARIK; (2004), “The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing The Conceptual Consideration Of Stakeholder Status For The Natural Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), ss. 55– 73.
10. FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1999), “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 233-236.
11. FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1984), “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach”, Pitman, Boston, 276s.
12. FROOMAN, Jeff; (1999), “Stakeholder Influence Strategies”, Academy Of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 191-204.
13. GARRIGA, Elisabet ve Mele DOME`NEC; (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory” Journal of Business Ethics, 53 ss. 51–71.
14. GOODPASTER, Kenneth E.; (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis” Business ethics quarterly, 1(1), ss. 53-73.
15. HILL, C.W.L. ve Thomas M. JONES; (1992), “Stakeholder-Agency Theory” Journal of Management Studies, 29, ss. 131-154.
16. JONES, Thomas M.; (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis Of Ethics And Economics” Academy Of Management Review, 20(2), ss. 404-437.
17. JONES, Thomas M. ve Andrew C. WICKS; (1999), “Convergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss.206–221.
18. JONKER, Jan ve David FOSTER; (2002), “ Stakeholder Excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), ss.187-195.
19. JOYCE, van der Laan Smith; Adhikari AJAY ve H. Tondkar RASOUL; (2005), “Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective” İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect .com, Erişim tarihi: 02.02.2006.
20. LORN, R. Sheehan ve Brent R. RICHE, “Destination Stakeholders Exploring Identity and Salience”, İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2006.
21. MITCHELL, Ronald. K.; Bradley R. AGLE ve Donna J. WOOD; (1997), “Toward A Theory Of Identification And Salience: Defining The Principle Of Who And What Really Counts”, Academy Of Management Review, 22(4), ss.853-886
22. MORI, Key; (2000), “Goodwill Hunting-The Importance of Stakeholder Relationships to Business Success” Audience Research Programme; İnternet Adresi: http://www.mori.com/polls/1999/keyaud.shtml, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2006
23. PEKKOLA, Juhani ve Kimmo PEKKOLA; (2001), “Theoretical essence of business ethics Classification of approaches, cultural and business environmental impacts on ethics” İnternet adresi: http:/www.unext.fi, Erişim tarihi: 19.06.2006.
24. POLONSKY, Michael Jay; (1995) “Incorporating The Natural Environment İn Corporate Strategy: A Stakeholder Approach”, İnternet adresi: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj02/polon01.html, Erişim tarihi: 21.04.2006
25. GRANT Savage; Timothy W. NIX, Carlton J. WHİTEHEAD ve John D. BLAIR; (1991), "Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders" Academy of Management Executive, (5)2, ss.51-75
26. SCHOLL, Hans J. Jochen; (2004), “Applying Stakeholder Theory to E- Government: Benefits and Limits”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 262(1-10) İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect. com Erişim tarihi: 14.11.2006
27. WATKINS, Miles, (1997), “Maximising Environmental Management Capacity Through Stakeholder Participation” Warwick Business School İnternet adresi: http://users.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/CCU Erişim tari- hi: 11.02.2006
28. WHYSALL, Paul; (2000), “Addressing Ethical İssues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective” Int. Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3), July, ss. 305–31
29. YAMAK Sibel ve Ömür SÜER; (2005) “State As A Stakeholder” Emerald Publishing, 5(2), ss. 111-120.