Application of Analytic Network Process (ANP) and PROMETHEE for different treatment/disposal technologies of persistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Year 2019, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 19 - 25, 31.03.2019

Mahmut Osmanbaşoğlu Aysun Ozkan Zerrin Günkaya Mufide Banar

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
are a group of hazardous chemicals that have persistent, bio accumulative and
toxic properties regulated under Stockholm Convention (SC). This study was to a
large extent focusing on selecting the appropriate treatment/disposal
technologies for environmentally sound disposal of POPs in compliant with SC
obligations. For this purpose, five different technologies were evaluated by
Analytic Network Process (ANP) and PROMETHEE methods which are the most
well-known Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. These technologies
are incineration, base-catalyzed decomposition (BCD), gas phase chemical
reduction (GPCR), pyrolysis/gasification and plasma arc. Eleven criteria by
means of benefit, cost and risk were used for evaluation. Incineration was
found as the preferred alternative for both methods (34 % for ANP and +0.41 for
PROMETHEE). The second option for ANP and PROMETHEE was plasma arc (24%) and
pyrolysis/gasification/ (+0.23), respectively. Although the results were slightly
different for two options, this difference is due to the mathematical
differences between the methods.

Keywords

ANP, MCDM, POPs disposal, PROMETHEE, treatment, waste

References

• Karababa, Ali Osman (ed). Çevre için Hekimler Derneği, Kalıcı Organik Kirleticiler ve Sağlık. Etki Matbaacılık, İzmir. 2014.
• L. Ritter, K.R. Solomon, J. Forget. Persistent organic pollutants. United Nations Environment. Programme.1996. http://www.chem.unep.ch/pops/ritter/en/ritteren.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2018.
• UNEP, Updated general technical guidelines for the environmentally sound management of wastes consisting of, containing or contaminated with persistent organic pollutants (POPs). 2015. [Online] Available: http://www.basel.int/Implementation/Publications/ArchivedTechnicalGuidelines/tabid/2362/Default.aspx, Accessed on 01.12.2017.
• Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. United Nations Environment. Programme. 2004. http://www.pops.int/TheConvention/Overview/TextoftheConvention/tabid/2232/Default.aspx. Accessed July 05, 2018.
• Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. United Nations Environment. Programme. 1998. http://basel.int/TheConvention/Overview/TextoftheConvention/tabid/1275/Default.aspx. Accessed July 05, 2018.
• Acar I.P., Özkan A., Banar M. Evaluation of the Alternative Solid Waste Landfill Sites by Decision Analysis with Multiple Criteria: A Case Study in Eskişehir City/Turkey. “8th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering-Theory, Applications and Practice”, Las Vegas, ABD. 2003.
• Agarwal E., Agarwal R., Garg R.D., Garg P.K. Desalination of groundwater potential zone: An AHP/ANP approach, J. Earth Syst. Sci.122, 3, 887–898. 2013.
• Banar M., Özkan A., Kulaç A. Choosing a recycling system using ANP and ELECTRE III techniques, Turkish J. Eng. Env. Sci., 34, 145-154. 2010.
• Khelifi O., Lodolo A., Vranes S., Centi G., Miertus S. A web-based decision support tool for groundwater remediation Technologies selection. J.Hydroinf., 8(2), 92-100. 2006.
• Özkan, A. Evaluation of healthcare waste treatment/disposal alternatives by using multi-criteria decision making techniques. Waste Manage. Res., 31 (2), 141-149. 2013.
• Figueira, J., Greco, S. and Ehrgott, M., Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, Boston, MA, USA, 1045 pp. 2005.Saaty TL. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 527 pp. 1994.
• Vincke P. Multicriteria Decision Aid. Wiley, NewYork, NY, USA, 174 pp. 1992.
• Ballı, S., Karasulu, B. And Korukoğlu, S. En Uygun Otomobil Seçimi Problemi İçin Bir Bulanık PROMETHEE Yöntemi Uygulaması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 139-147. 2007.
• STAP (The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the Global Environment Facility). Selection of Persistent Organic Pollutant Disposal Technology for the Global Environment Facility. A STAP advisory document. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC. 2011.
• Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Detailed review of selected non-incineration and incineration POPs Elimination Technologies for the CEE Region. Available from: www.mst.dk/publications/. 2004.
• CMPS&F – Environment Australia. Appropriate Technologies for the Treatment of Scheduled Wastes: Review Report Number 4. Available from: www.deh.gov.au. 1997.
• Tangri, N. and Wilson, M. Waste Gasification & Pyrolysis: High Risk, Low Yield Processes for Waste Management, GAIA. 2017.
• Buttker, B., et al.: Full scale industrial recovery trials of shredder residue in a high temperature slagging-bed-gasifier in Germany. Sekundärrohstoff-Verwertungszentrum Schwarze Pumpe (SVZ), Technologie-Entwicklungs-GmbH für ökoeffiziente Polymerverwertung (Tecpol), Association of Plastics Manufacturers (PlasticsEurope), 2005.
• Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A. and Aghdasi, M. PROMETHEE: A Comprehensive Literature Review on Methodologies and Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 198–215. 2007.
• Saaty T. The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: RWS Publications. 2001.