Operation cost analysis of UV-based ballast water treatment system used on a bulk carrier ship

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 349 - 356, 31.12.2022

Veysi Başhan , Ahmet Kaya

https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1191003

Abstract

According to IMO rules, when a new machine system needs to be integrated into the ship, it is required to have low fuel consumption in terms of energy efficiency and emissions. The same is true for ballast treatment. Many different types of ballast water treatment systems (BWTS) are available on the marine market. Ship operators want to choose BWTS that will consume minimum fuel and operate at maximum efficiency. Therefore, in this study, fuel consumption under both IMO and USCG conditions, and hence the operational cost, is calculated if the UV-based BWTS system is integrated into a bulk carrier ship. As a result, the highest cost is $9773 when the most expensive fuel, MGO, is used and operation is performed with a single ballast pump. In USCG mode, the minimum cost is $6382 and the maximum cost is $18929 under the same conditions. It is seen that if the fuel price increases to 1.4 $/kg, the cost of using BWTS in IMO mode can increase to $11392, and if it drops to 0.3 $/kg, the cost of using BWTS in IMO mode can decrease to $1826. It is seen that the highest cost can go up to $22066 and the lowest cost can go down to $3983, with the change of fuel prices in the use of BWTS in USCG mode. With the resulting formulation, with the power consumption of the BWTS and the diesel generator shop trail test fuel consumption values, researchers or shipping companies can repeat the calculations for all kinds of different fuels and different amounts of ultraviolet (UV) chambers for variable ballast operations with different ballast tank capacities. Consequently, it is thought that this study is useful in determining the additional operational cost of UV-based BWTSs.

Keywords

Ballast water treatment, bulk carrier, cost analysis, ship, UV

References

• [1] E. Tsolaki and E. Diamadopoulos, “Technologies for ballast water treatment: a review,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 19–32, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1002/jctb.2276.
• [2] S. Olenin, S. Gollasch, S. Jonušas, and I. Rimkutė, “En-Route Investigations of Plankton in Ballast Water on a Ship’s Voyage from the Baltic Sea to the Open Atlantic Coast of Europe,” Internat. Rev. Hydrobiol., vol. 85, no. 5–6, pp. 577–596, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1002/1522-2632(200011)85:5/6<577::AID-IROH577>3.0.CO;2-C.
• [3] “Ballast water management - the control of harmful invasive species.” https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/BWM-default.aspx (accessed Oct. 09, 2022).
• [4] O. Casas-Monroy, R. D. Linley, P.-S. Chan, J. Kydd, J. Vanden Byllaardt, and S. Bailey, “Evaluating efficacy of filtration + UV-C radiation for ballast water treatment at different temperatures,” Journal of Sea Research, vol. 133, pp. 20–28, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2017.02.001.
• [5] B. Sayinli, Y. Dong, Y. Park, A. Bhatnagar, and M. Sillanpää, “Recent progress and challenges facing ballast water treatment – A review,” Chemosphere, vol. 291, p. 132776, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132776.
• [6] T. Makkonen and T. Inkinen, “Systems of environmental innovation: sectoral and technological perspectives on ballast water treatment systems,” WMU J Marit Affairs, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 81–98, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s13437-021-00226-2.
• [7] Ü. Özdemir, “A quantitative approach to the development of ballast water treatment systems in ships,” Ships and Offshore Structures, pp. 1–8, May 2022, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2022.2077544.
• [8] E. Lakshmi, M. Priya, and V. S. Achari, “An overview on the treatment of ballast water in ships,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 199, p. 105296, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105296.
• [9] W. A. Gerhard, K. Lundgreen, G. Drillet, R. Baumler, H. Holbech, and C. K. Gunsch, “Installation and use of ballast water treatment systems – Implications for compliance and enforcement,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 181, p. 104907, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104907.
• [10] A. Vorkapić, R. Radonja, and D. Zec, “Cost Efficiency of Ballast Water Treatment Systems Based on Ultraviolet Irradiation and Electrochlorination,” PROMET, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 343–348, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.7307/ptt.v30i3.2564.
• [11] I. Animah, “A fuzzy analytical hierarchy process–weighted linear combination decision-making model for prioritization of ballast water treatment technologies by ship owners in Ghana,” Proceedings of the IMechE, vol. 233, no. 4, pp. 1276–1286, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1475090218817041.
• [12] J. Ren, “Technology selection for ballast water treatment by multi-stakeholders: A multi-attribute decision analysis approach based on the combined weights and extension theory,” Chemosphere, vol. 191, pp. 747–760, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.053.
• [13] P.-G. Jang, B. Hyun, and K. Shin, “Ballast Water Treatment Performance Evaluation under Real Changing Conditions,” JMSE, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 817, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/jmse8100817.
• [14] W. A. M. Hijnen, E. F. Beerendonk, and G. J. Medema, “Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: A review,” Water Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 3–22, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.030.
• [15] S. Viitasalo, J. Sassi, J. Rytkönen, and E. Leppäkoski, “Ozone, Ultraviolet Light, Ultrasound and Hydrogen Peroxide As Ballast Water Treatments-Experiments with Mesozooplankton In Low-Saline Brackish Water.,” Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, 2005.
• [16] E. Joyce, S. S. Phull, J. P. Lorimer, and T. J. Mason, “The development and evaluation of ultrasound for the treatment of bacterial suspensions. A study of frequency, power and sonication time on cultured Bacillus species,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 315–318, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1350-4177(03)00101-9.
• [17] Ceren Bilgin Güney, “Balast Suyu Arıtım Sistemlerinin İncelenmesi,” DEN 2017 / 2, 2017.
• [18] E. Mesbahi, “Latest results from testing seven different technologies under the EU MARTOB project-Where do we stand now,” in Second International Symposium on Ballast Water Treatment. International Maritime Organisation, London, UK, 2004, pp. 210–230.
• [19] V. Başhan, H. İ. Sönmez, and G. Gonca, “Bir Yük Gemisinin Balast Operasyonunun Ekonomik ve Ekolojik Analizi,” İstanbul, Turkey, 2016, pp. 659–670. [Online]. Available: https://www.gmo.org.tr/upl/misc/yayinlar/gmo-shipmar-bildiri-kitabi.pdf
• [20] “Ballast Water Treatment System - Optimarin.” https://optimarin.com/ (accessed Oct. 15, 2022).
• [21] “Average Bunker Prices,” Ship & Bunker. https://shipandbunker.com/prices/av (accessed Oct. 16, 2022).