Bakım/Özen Etiği Ve Eğitim Felsefesinde Feminizm Temelli Bir Yaklaşım

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 72 - 85, 01.12.2016

Raşit Çelik

https://doi.org/10.1501/Fe0001_0000000166

Cited By: 3

Öz

Bakım/özen etiği ahlak felsefesi içerisinde dikkate değer şekilde gelişim göstermeye devam eden önemli bir yaklaşımdır. Bu etik yaklaşım kaynağını on dokuzuncu yüzyılın ikinci yarısında ortaya çıkan feminist hareketlerden alır. Feminist düşünce hareketlerinin gösterdiği ilerleme doğrultusunda, bakım/özen etiği de etkili olduğu alanları önemli derecede genişletmiştir. Bu alanlardan bir tanesi eğitim felsefesidir. Hem etik alanındaki genel felsefi tartışmalara hem de eğitim felsefesindeki bazı önemli tartışmalara yaptığı katkılarla, bakım/özen etiği özgün bir etik teori ve eğitim yaklaşımı oluşturmuştur. Bu çalışmada bir yandan bakım/özen etiğinin temel argümanları incelenirken, bir yandan da eğitim felsefesi içerisinde hala gelişmekte olan önemli bir yaklaşım tartışılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Feminizm, bakım/özen etiği, eğitim felsefesi, ahlak felsefesi, etik

A Feminist Approach towards Ethics of Care and Philosophy of Education

Öz

A Feminist Approach towards Ethics of Care and Philosophy of Education Care ethics, which still continues to develop, appears to be an important approach in contemporary moral philosophy. Such approach takes its roots from the feminist movements occurred in the second half of the twentieth century. Similar to the progress of the feminist movements, care ethics movement has considerably extended its influence over different fields in the past years, including the field of philosophy of education. With its contributions both to the general discussions in ethics and to some important discussions in philosophy of education, care ethics movement has developed a unique theory of ethics and an approach to education. In this study, some central argument of care ethics are analyzed and also an important approach that continues to develop in philosophy of education is discussed

Anahtar Kelimeler

Feminism, care ethics, philosophy of education, moral philosophy, ethics

Kaynakça

• Arnot, Madeleine ve Jo-Anne Dillabough. “Feminist Politics and Democratic Values in Education.” Curriculum Inquiry 29, no. 2 (1999): 159-189.
• Clark, Lorenne M. G. ve Lynda Lange (ed.). The Sexism of Social and Political Theory: Women and Reproduction from Plato to Nietzsche (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1979).
• Dewey, John. Democracy and Education (Middlesex: Echo Library, 2007).
• Freeland, Cynthia A. (ed.). Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998).
• Ferguson, Ann. “Twenty Years of Feminist Philosophy.” Hypatia 9, no. 3 (1994): 197-215.
• Garber, Elizabeth. “Feminism, Aesthetics, and Art Education.” Studies in Art Education 33, no. 4 (1992): 210-225.
• Gilligan, Carol. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982).
• Gonzalez, Ana Marta. “Kant’s Philosophy of Education: Between Relational and Systemic Approaches.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 45, no. 3 (2011): 433-454.
• Held, Virginia. The Ethics of Care (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
• Hemmings, Clare. “Telling Feminist Stories.” Feminist Theory 6, no. 2 (2005): 115-139.
• Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993).
• Johnston, D. Kay. Education for a Caring Society (New York: Teachers College, 2006).
• Johnston, James Scott. “Moral Law and Moral Education: Defending Kantian Autonomy.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 41, no. 2 (2007): 233-245.
• Kant, Immanuel. Pratik Aklın Eleştirisi (İstanbul: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu 1999).
• Kant, Immanuel. Ahlak Metafiziğinin Temellendirilmesi (İstanbul: Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 2009).
• Keller, Jean. “Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics.” Hypatia 12, no. 2 (1997): 152-165.
• Kohlberg, Lawrence. The Philosophy of Moral Development (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1981).
• Kohlberg, Lawrence. The Psychology of Moral Development (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1984).
• Luke, Carmen. “Feminist Pedagogy Theory: Reflections on Power and Authority.” Educational Theory 46, no. 3 (1996): 283-302.
• Mackenzie, Catriona ve Natalie Stoljar (ed.) Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
• Martin, J. Roland. “Sophie and Emile: A Case Study of Sex Bias in the History of Educational Thought.” Harvard Educational Review 51, no. 3 (1981): 357-372.
• Martin J. Roland. “Excluding Women from the Educatioanl Realm.” Harvard Educational Review 52, no. 2 (1982): 133-148.
• Martin, J. Roland. “Bringing Women into Educational Thought.” Educational Theory 34, no. 4 (1984): 341-354.
• Martin, J. Roland. Reclaiming a Conversation: The Ideal of the Educated Woman (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985).
• Martin, J. Roland. Coming of Age in Academe (New York: Routledge, 2000).
• Martin, J. Roland. “Feminism,” A Companion to the Philosophy of Education ed. Curren, Randall (Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2003), 192-205.
• Nicholson, Linda J. “Women and Scholling.” Educational Theory 39, no. 3 (1980): 225-233.
• Noddings, Nel. Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984/2013).
• Noddings, Nel. Educating Moral People (New York: Teachers College Press, 2002).
• Noddings, Nel. Philosophy of Education (Boulder: Westview Press, 2012).
• Noddings, Nel. The Challenge to Care in Schools, 2nd Ed. (New York: Teachers College Press, 1992/2005).
• Okin, Susan Moller. Women in Western Political Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).
• Oliver, Kelly ve Marilyn Pearsall (ed.). Feminist Interpretations of Friedrich Nietzsche (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998).
• Purdy, M. Laura. Reproducing Presons: Issues feminist Bioethics (Ithaca: Cornel University Press, 1996).
• Rice, Suzanne. “The “Discovery” and Evolution of Sexual Harrassment as an Educational Issue.” Initiatives 57, no. 2 (1996): 1-14.
• Rousseau, J. J. Emile (Vermont: Everyman, 1993).
• Ruddick, Sara. “Maternal Thinking.” Feminist Studies 6, no. 2 (1980): 342-367.
• Schott, Robin M. (ed.). Feminist Interpretations of Immanuel Kant (University Park: Pennsylvania Satte University Press, 1997).
• Sidorkin, Alexander M. Learning Relations (New York: Peter Lang, 2002).
• Stone, Lynda (ed.). The Education Feminism Reader (New York: Routledge, 1994).
• Thompson, Audrey. “Not the Color Purple: Black Feminist Lesssons for Educational Caring.” Harvard Educational Review 68, no. 4 (1998): 522-554.
• Titone, Connie ve Karen E. Maloney (ed.). Women’s Philosophies of Education: Thinking through our Mothers (Upper Saddle River: Merril, 1999).
• Tuana, Nancy (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Plato (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994).
• Tuana, Nancy ve Rosemarie Tong (ed.) Feminism and Philosophy (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995).
• Waerness, Kari. “The Rationality of Caring.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 5, no. 2 (1984): 185-212.
• Warnock, Mary. Women Philosophers (London: J. M. Dent, 1996).
• Watson, Jean. Nursing: The Philosophy and Science of Caring (Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press, 1979).