Ülkelerarası Büyüme FarklılıklarınıAçıklanmasında Kurumların Önemi:Panel Veri Analizi

Year 2017, Issue: 632, 39 - 53, 01.10.2017

Merve Yolal Aygül Anavatan

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, kurumlar ve onların sahip olduğu kurumsal yapıların ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkileri 107 ülke için 2003-2014 yılları arasını kapsayan dönemde panel veri yöntemi kullanılarak tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Yapılan analizde ülkelerin ekonomik büyümesini açıklamak amacıyla ekonomik özgürlükler, politik haklar ve sivil özgürlükler ile kurumsal yapıyı temsil eden yolsuzluğun kontrolü, politik istikrar, hukukun üstünlüğü ve hesap verebilirlik değişkenleri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar kurumsal yapı ile ekonomik büyüme arasında pozitif yönlü ilişkinin varlığını göstermekte ve ülkelerin kurumsal yapıları ile bağlantılı olarak ekonomik gelişme sergilediklerini ortaya koymaktadır.

The Importance of Institutions in Explaining Growth Differences Between Countries

Abstract

In this study, we have attempted to determine the impacts of institutions and their structures on economic growth using panel data method for the period 2003- 2014 for 107 countries. We have used variables of economic freedom, political rights and civil liberties, and the variables of control of corruption, political stability, rule of law and accountability, which represent the institutional structure to explain growth in the analysis. The findings reveal that there is a positive relationship between institutional structure and economic growth and that the countries exhibit economic development in connection with institutional structures

References

• ACEMOĞLU, Daron ve James ROBINSON; (2008), The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development Commission on Growth and Development, World Bank Publications, Washington DC.
• ACEMOĞLU, Daron, Simon JOHNSON ve James A. ROBINSON; (2005), “Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of LongRun Growth”, Hand book of Economic Growth, 1, ss. 385-472.
• ACEMOĞLU, Daron; (2008), “Oligarchic Versus Democratic Societies”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(1), ss. 1-44.
• ARTAN, Seyfettin ve Pınar HAYALOĞLU; (2013), “Ülkelerarası Büyüme Farklılıklarının Açıklanmasında Kurumsal Yapının Rolü: Panel Veri Analizi”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 8(3), ss. 31-54.
• ARTAN, Seyfettin ve Pınar HAYALOĞLU; (2014), “Kurumsal Yapı ve İktisadi Büyüme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği”, Sosyoekonomi, 2, ss. 347-365.
• BAKIRTAŞ, Doğan; (2014), “Kurumsal İktisat Perspektifinden Vergi Kültürü ve Ekonomik Gelişme: Teori ve Uygulama”, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• BREUER, Janice Boucher, MCNOWN, Robert ve Myles WALLACE; (2002), “Series-specific Unit Root Tests with Panel Data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 5, ss. 527- 546.
• BREUSCH, Trevor Stanley ve Adrian Rodney PAGAN; (1980), “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics”, The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), ss. 239-253.
• BUSH, Paul D; (1983), “An Exploration of the Structural Characteristic of a Veblen- Ayres-Foster Defined Institutional Domain”, Journal of Economic Issues, 17(1), ss.35-66.
• CHOI, In; (2001), “Unit root tests for panel data”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, ss. 249-272.
• COMMONS, John Rogers; (1931), “Institutional Economics”, American Economic Review, 21, ss. 648-657.
• FICHTER, Joseph; (1990), “Sosyoloji Nedir?”, Çev. Nilgün Çelebi, Selçuk Üniversitesi FEF Yayınları, Konya.
• GAGLIARDI, Francesca; (2008), “Institutions and Economic Change: A Critical Survey of the New Institutional Approaches and Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), ss.416-443.
• GÖKALP, M. Faysal ve Ercan BALDEMİR; (2008), “Kurumsal Yapı ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), ss. 212-226.
• GRIEF, Avner; (2006), “Institution and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade”, Cambridge University Press, ABD.
• HADRI, Kaddour; (2000), “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data”, The Econometrics Journal, 3, ss. 148-161.
• IM, Kyung So, PESARAN, Mohammad Hashem ve Yongcheol SHIN; (2003), “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), ss. 53-74.
• KAPP, K. William; (1968), “In defense of Institutional Economics”, The Swedish Journal of Economics, 70(1), ss.1-18.
• LEVIN, Andrew ve Chien-Fu LIN; (1992), Unit Root Tests in Panel Data, Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties, No. 92- 93, San Diego.
• LEVIN, Andrew, LIN, Chien-Fu ve Chia-Shang James CHU; (2002), “Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finitesample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), ss. 1-24.
• MADDALA, Gangadharrao Soundalyarao ve Shaowen WU; (1999), “A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), ss. 631-652.
• NEALE, Walter C.; (1987), “Institutions”, Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), ss. 1177-1206.
• NORTH, Douglass Cecil; (2002), “Kurumlar, Kurumsal Değişim ve Ekonomik Performans”, Çev. Gül Çağalı Güven, Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
• ÖZDEMİR, Pınar; (2015), “Kurumlar, Yönetişim ve Ekonomik Gelişme”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Adana.
• PEDRONI, Peter; (1999), “Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), ss. 653-670.
• PEDRONI, Peter; (2000), “Fully-Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels”, Advances in Econometrics, 15, ss. 93-130.
• PEDRONI, Peter; (2004), “Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20, ss. 597-625.
• PESARAN, Mohammad Hashem; (2004), General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, No. CWPE 0435, Mimeo, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
• PESARAN, Mohammad Hashem; (2007), “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22, ss. 265-312.
• PESARAN, Mohammad Hashem ve Takashi Yamagata; (2008), “Testing slope homogeneity in large panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 142, ss. 50-93.
• SOWELL, Thomas; (1967), “The Evolutionary Economics of Thorstein Veblen”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 19(2), ss. 177-198.
• ŞAHBAZ, Ahmet; (2013), “Mülkiyet Hakları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: AB Ülkeleri Üzerine Ampirik Bir İnceleme”, Sosyoekonomi, 2, ss.161-179.
• TAYLOR, Mark P. ve Lucio SARNO; (1998), “The behavior of real exchange rates during the post- Bretton Woods period”, Journal of International Economics, 46, ss. 281-312.
• TÜRK DİL KURUMU; (2016), “Kurum”, http://www.tdk.gov.tr/ index.php?option=com_bts&arama =kelime&guid=TDK.GTS.5 78bf7311331d7.05390987, (20.04.2017).
• VEBLEN, Thorstein; (1909), “The Limitations Marginal Utility”, Journal of Political Economy, 17(9), ss. 620-636.
• VEBLEN, Thorstein; (1961), “Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions”, New York: Random House.
• VOIGT, Stefan; (2009), “How (not) to Measure Institutions”, Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 37, ss. 1-25.
• YILDIRIM, Selim; (2010), “Kurumların Dinamik Yapısının Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerine Etkisinin Analizi”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(3), ss. 111-126.
• WESTERLUND, Joakim; (2007), “Testing for error correction in panel data”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), ss. 709-748.
• WESTERLUND, Joakim; (2008), “Panel Cointegration Tests of the Fisher Effect”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, ss. 193-233.
• WESTERLUND, Joakim ve David L. EDGERTON; (2007), “A panel bootstrap cointegration test”, Economics Letters, 97, ss. 185-190