Yaratıcı Öz Yeterlilik ve Yeşil Paylaşılan Vizyonun Yeşil İnovatif Davranış Eğilimleri Üzerindeki Etkileri: Lojistik Sektörü Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 1100 - 1122, 27.09.2024

Itır Hasırcı , Edip Örücü , Ramazan Özkan Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1454350

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı lojistik sektörü çalışanlarının yaratıcı öz yeterliliklerinin ve yeşil paylaşılan vizyonlarının yeşil inovatif davranış eğilimleri üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de lojistik sektöründe çalışan 564.323 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Veriler online anket yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Dolayısıyla araştırmanın örneklemini bu çalışanlardan seçilen 421 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Toplanan verilerle frekans analizi, keşfedici faktör analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, normalli analizi korelasyon analizi ve regresyon analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan korelasyon analizinin neticesinde yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yeşil paylaşılan vizyonla anlamlı, yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yeşil inovatif davranışla anlamlı, yeşil paylaşılan vizyonun yeşil inovatif davranışla ilişkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Regresyon analizinin sonucuna göre yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin ve yeşil paylaşılan vizyonun yeşil inovatif davranış eğilimleri üzerinde anlamlı etkilerinin olduğu belirlenmiştir. Regresyon analizine göre yaratıcı öz yeterliliğin yeşil paylaşılan vizyondan daha fazla yeşil inovatif davranış eğilimlerini etkilediği görülmüştür. Sonuç olarak bu örneklemde paylaşılan yeşil vizyonun önemini tüm çalışanlara kazandırmak adına tavsiyeler sunulmuştur. Literatürde yaratıcı öz yeterlilik ve yeşil paylaşılan vizyonun yeşil inovatif davranış eğilimleri üzerindeki etkisini ele alan araştırma örneği bulunmadığı için bu araştırmanın özgün olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Yaratıcı Öz Yeterlilik, Yeşil Paylaşılan Vizyon, Yeşil İnovatif Davranış, Lojistik Sektörü

Effects of Creative Self-Efficacy and Green Shared Vision on Green Innovative Behavior Tendencies: A Research on the Logistics Industry

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of creative self-efficacy and green shared vision on the inclination of employees in the logistics sector to engage in green innovative behaviour. The study's population comprises 564,323 individuals employed in the logistics sector in Turkey. Information was acquired via an internet-based questionnaire. Hence, the study's sample comprises 421 individuals who were chosen from the pool of employees. The analysed data was subjected to frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, normality analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. The correlation study revealed a substantial association between creative self-efficacy and green shared vision, creative self-efficacy and green innovative conduct, and green shared vision and green innovative behaviour. According to the results of the regression analysis, it was determined that creative self-efficacy and green shared vision had significant effects on green innovative behavior tendencies. According to regression analysis, creative self-efficacy was found to affect green innovative behavior tendencies more than green shared vision. Consequently, suggestions were put forward to highlight the significance of a collective environmentally friendly vision to all staff members in this particular group. This study is considered novel because there is no existing research example in the literature that evaluates the impact of creative self-efficacy and green shared vision on green innovative behaviour tendencies.

Keywords

Creative Self Efficacy, Green Shared Vision, Green Innovative Work Behavior, Logistic Industry

References

• Abdullah, M. I., Ashraf, S. & Sarfraz, M. (2017). The Organizational Identification Perspective of CSR on Creative Performance: The Moderating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Sustainability, 9(11), 2125-2145.
• Abdullah, N. H., Wahab, E. & Shamsuddin, A. (2019). Creative Self-Efficacy, Innovative Work Behaviour and Job Performance Among Selected Manufacturing Employees. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 291-297.
• Aboramadan, M., Crawford, J., Turkmenoglu, M. A. & Farao, C. (2022). Green Inclusive Leadership and Employee Green Behaviors in the Hotel Industry: Does Perceived Green Organizational Support Matter?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103-130.
• Afshar Jahanshahi, A., Maghsoudi, T., & Shafighi, N. (2021). Employees' Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Critical Role of Environmental Justice Perception. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 1-14.
• Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S. & Asadnezhad, M. (2021). Does Entrepreneurial Leadership Encourage Innovation Work Behavior? The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Support for Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1-22.
• Alzoubi, A., Al Qudah, M., Albursan, I., Bakhiet, S. & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). The Effect of Creative Thinking Education in Enhancing Creative Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Motivation. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 117-117.
• Amiruddin, A., Rongre, Y., Sudirman, S. & Malik, A. (2021). Shared Vision-Based Teamwork Cohesiveness: Catalyst for Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 3, 523-534.
• Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L. & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External Knowledge Sources, Green Innovation and Performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 210-220.
• Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of Motivation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Human Behavior Drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104-117.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-211.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V. & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self‐Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children's Aspirations and Career Trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.
• Bass, B. M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
• Chang, C. H. & Chen, Y. S. (2013). Green Organizational Identity and Green Innovation. Management Decision, 51(5), 1056-1070.
• Chang, T. W. (2020). Corporate Sustainable Development Strategy: Effect of Green Shared Vision on Organization Members’ Behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 24-46.
• Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H. & Lin, Y. H. (2014). The Determinants of Green Radical and Incremental Innovation Performance: Green Shared Vision, Green Absorptive Capacity and Green Organizational Ambidexterity. Sustainability, 6(11), 7787-7806.
• Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., Yeh, S. L. & Cheng, H. I. (2015). Green Shared Vision and Green Creativity: The Mediation Roles of Green Mindfulness and Green Self-Efficacy. Quality & Quantity, 49, 1169-1184.
• Chen, J. & Zhang, A. (2023). Exploring How and When Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Impacts Employees’ Green Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Environmental Commitment. Sustainability, 16(1), 234-254.
• Dodgers, S., Cordoba, S., & Coe, J. (2023). Examining the Role of Childhood Experiences in Gender Identity and Expression: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Using Social Learning Theory. Gender Issues, 40(2), 255-274.
• Ercantan, O., & Eyupoglu, S. (2022). How Do Green Human Resource Management Practices Encourage Employees to Engage in Green Behavior? Perceptions of University Students as Prospective Employees. Sustainability, 14(3), 1718.
• Fang, W., Wu, T. H., Chang, T. W. & Hung, C. Z. (2021). What Could Entrepreneurial Vision Do for Sustainable Development? Explore the Cross-Level Impact of Organizational Members’ Green Shared Vision on Green Creativity. Sustainability, 13(10), 5364-5384.
• Field, Z., Miles, J. & Field, A. (2012). Discovering Statistics Using R. California: Sage Publications.
• Finnsgård, C., Kalantari, J., Raza, Z., Roso, V. & Woxenius, J. (2018). Swedish Shippers’ Strategies for Coping with Slow-Steaming in Deep Sea Container Shipping. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 3(1), 1-24.
• Fulconis, F. & Lissillour, R. (2021). Toward a Behavioral Approach of International Shipping: A Study of the Inter-Organisational Dynamics of Maritime Safety. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6, 1-23.
• Gelaidan, H. M., Al-Swidi, A. K. & Al-Hakimi, M. A. (2023). Servant and Authentic Leadership as Drivers of Innovative Work Behaviour: The Moderating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 1-13.
• George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. London: Pearson.
• Gist, M. E. & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
• González Laxe, F., Sánchez, R. J. & Garcia-Alonso, L. (2016). The Adaptation Process in Port Governance: The Case of the Latin Countries in South America and Europe. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 1, 1-20.
• Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
• Hall, J. M. & Ponton, M. K. (2005). Mathematics Self-Efficacy of College Freshman. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(3), 26-36.
• Han, G. H. & Bai, Y. (2020). Leaders Can Facilitate Creativity: The Moderating Roles of Leader Dialectical Thinking and LMX on Employee Creative Self-Efficacy and Creativity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), 405-417.
• Haşıloğlu, S. B., Baran, T., & Aydın, O. (2015). Pazarlama Araştırmalarındaki Potansiyel Problemlere Yönelik Bir Araştırma: Kolayda Örnekleme ve Sıklık İfadeli Ölçek Maddeleri. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, 1, 19-28.
• Jaiswal, N. K. & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational Leadership, Innovation Climate, Creative Self-Efficacy and Employee Creativity: A Multilevel Study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 30-41.
• Jan, G., Zainal, S. R. M. & Lee, M. C. C. (2021). HRM Practices and Innovative Work Behavior Within the Hotel Industry in Pakistan: Harmonious Passion as a Mediator. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 20(4), 512-541.
• Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader Creativity Expectations Motivate Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724-749.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). A Computational Starting Point for Rao's Canonical Factor Analysis: Implications for Computerized Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(3), 691-692.
• Kantabutra, S. (2020). Toward an Organizational Theory of Sustainability Vision. Sustainability, 12(3), 1125. Karimi, S., Ahmadi Malek, F., Yaghoubi Farani, A. & Liobikienė, G. (2023). The Role of Transformational Leadership in Developing Innovative Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Employees’ Psychological Capital. Sustainability, 15(2), 1267-1277.
• Kim, W. & Park, J. (2017). Examining Structural Relationships Between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205-214.
• Larwood, L., Falbe, C. M., Kriger, M. P. & Miesing, P. (1995). Structure and Meaning of Organizational Vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 740-769.
• Latif, B., Gunarathne, N., Gaskin, J., San Ong, T., & Ali, M. (2022). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility and Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Effect of Green Shared Vision and Personal Ties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186, 106572.
• Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Muhammad Ali, A., Khaqan, Z. & Amina, S. (2019). Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Sustainability, 11(6), 1594-1622.
• Li, Y., Zhu, Z., & Xu, P. (2022). Research on the Green Production Motivation of New Agricultural Business Entities: Benefit Perception and Environmental Regulation. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022(1), 918-935.
• Lim, K. G. & Lim, M. (2020). Financial Performance of Shipping Firms that Increase LNG Carriers and the Support of Eco-Innovation. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 5(1), 1-25.
• Liu, Y., Wang, A., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental Regulation and Green Innovation: Evidence from China’s New Environmental Protection Law. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126-146.
• Liu, B., Li, Z., Yang, X., Wang, J., & Qiu, Z. (2024). National Innovative City and Green Technology Progress: Empirical Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(25), 36311-36328.
• Maitlo, Q., Wang, X., Jingdong, Y., Lashari, I. A., Faraz, N. A., & Hajaro, N. H. (2022). Exploring Green Creativity: The Effects of Green Transformational Leadership, Green Innovation Climate and Green Autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 686-696.
• Marchyta, N. K. & Santoso, T. (2021). Mediating Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy on the Influence of Knowledge Sharing Towards Innovative Work Behavior Among Millennial Knowledge Workers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Petra Christian University.
• Mathisen, G. E. & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative Self-Efficacy: An Intervention Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21-29.
• Mehmood, M. S., Jian, Z. & Gilal, F. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Employee Innovative Behavior: Intervening Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Human Systems Management, 39(3), 367-379.
• Mittal, S. & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Management Decision, 53(5), 894-910.
• Newman, A., Herman, H. M., Schwarz, G. & Nielsen, I. (2018). The Effects of Employees' Creative Self-Efficacy on Innovative Behavior: The Role of Entrepreneurial Leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1-9.
• Ogiemwonyi, O., Alam, M. N., Alshareef, R., Alsolamy, M., Azizan, N. A., & Mat, N. (2023). Environmental Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviors of the Consumers: Mediating Role of Environmental Attitude. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 10, 100-130.
• Ong, T. S., Lee, A. S., Latif, B., Sroufe, R., Sharif, A., & Heng Teh, B. (2023). Enabling Green Shared Vision: Linking Environmental Strategic Focus and Environmental Performance Through ISO 14001 and Technological Capabilities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 31711-31726.
• Onputtha, S., Sriboonlue, U., & Sriboonlue, O. (2021). The Role of Knowledge Transfer Among Creative Behavior, Green Service Behavior and Environmental Performance in Logistics Service Industry. J. Manag. Inf. Decis. Sci, 24, 1-12.
• Patterson, F., Kerrin, M., & Gatto-Roissard, G. (2009). Characteristics and Behaviours of Innovative People in Organisations. Literature Review. Prepared for the NESTA Policy & Research Unit, 1, 1-63.
• Puccio, G. & Grivas, C. (2009). Examining the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Creativity Styles. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 247-255.
• Rice, M. P., O'Connor, G. C., Peters, L. S. & Morone, J. G. (1998). Managing Discontinuous Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 41(3), 52-58.
• Shafaei, A., & Nejati, M. (2023). Green Human Resource Management and Employee Innovative Behaviour: Does Inclusive Leadership Play a Role?. Personnel Review, (ahead-of-print).
• Senbel, M. (2015). Leadership in Sustainability Planning: Propagating Visions Through Empathic Communication. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(3), 464-481.
• Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S. & Higgins, C. A. (1998). A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 342-353.
• Su, X., Xu, A., Lin, W., Chen, Y., Liu, S. & Xu, W. (2020). Environmental Leadership, Green Innovation Practices, Environmental Knowledge Learning and Firm Performance. Sage Open, 10(2), 21581, 1-14.
• Sun, U. Y., Xu, H., Kluemper, D. H., McLarty, B. D., & Yun, S. (2024). Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Sharing: A Social Cognitive Approach Investigating the Role of Self-Efficacy As a Key Mechanism. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114-126.
• Tang, C., Ma, H., Naumann, S. E. & Xing, Z. (2020). Perceived Work Uncertainty and Creativity During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Zhongyong and Creative Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 596-615.
• Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
• Vogus, T. J. & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2012). Organizational Mindfulness and Mindful Organizing: A Reconciliation and Path Forward. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 722-735.
• Younas, N., Hossain, M. B., Syed, A., Ejaz, S., Ejaz, F., Jagirani, T. S., & Dunay, A. (2023). Green Shared Vision: A Bridge Between Responsible Leadership and Green Behavior Under Individual Green Values. Heliyon, 9(11), 1-13.
• Zacher, H., Rudolph, C. W., & Katz, I. M. (2023). Employee Green Behavior as the Core of Environmentally Sustainable Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 465-494.
• Zhang, G. & Wang, Y. (2022). Organizational Identification and Employees’ Innovative Behavior: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and the Moderating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. Chinese Management Studies, 16(5), 1108-1123.
• Zhao, M., Yao, L., Ma, R., Sarmad, M., Orangzab, Ayub, A., & Jun, Z. (2023). How Green Mindfulness and Green Shared Vision Interact to Influence Green Creative Behavior. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1707-1723.
• Zhou, X., Shu, L., Xu, Z., & Padrón, Y. (2023). The Effect of Professional Development on In-Service STEM Teachers’ Self-Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 37-46.
• Walters, G. D. (2019). Social Control Versus Social Learning: Self-Efficacy for Future Academic Success and Peer Delinquency as Mediators of the Parental Support–Delinquency Relationship. Criminal Justice Review, 44(2), 101-118.