Research Article
ÜRETİM FONKSİYONU TAHMİNLERİNDE KARŞILAŞILAN PROBLEMLER VE EŞANLI DENKLEM SAPMASI: ALTERNATİF TAHMİN YÖNTEMLERİ
Abstract
Üretim
fonksiyonlarının ekonometrik tahminleri birçok ekonomik analizde anahtar rol
oynamaktadır. Bunun-la birlikte bu fonksiyonların tahmininde önemli problemler
söz konusudur. Bu problemlerden en önemlisi “eşanlı denklem sapmasıdır.” Bu
çalışmada üretim fonksiyonlarının tahmininde karşılaşılan problemler ele
alınarak uygulamaya yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.
References
- 1. Ackerberg, D., L. Benkard, S. Berry ve A. Pa-kes (2005) “Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes,” yayınlanmamış çalışma.
- 2. Avralıoğlu, Zeki (1978). Üretim Fonksiyonları, Doktora Tezi, AİTİA Yayınları No:102
- 3. Barro, R. J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Econo-mic growth. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass.
- 4. Cobb, C. W. ve Douglas P. H. (1928) “A Theory of Production,” American Economic Review, Vol.18 (Supplement), 139-165.
- 5. Griliches, Z. (1980). “Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sec-tor.” New Developments in Productivity Mea-surement J.W. Kendrick ve B. Vaccara tarafın-dan derlemede, Studies in Income and Wealth Vol.44 içinde, Chicago University Press, Chica-go
- 6. Griliches, Z. ve J. Mairesse (1998). “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” Eco-nometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Sym-posium içinde, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- 7. Hoch, I. (1962) “Estimation of Production Para-meters Using Time-Series and Cross-Section Data,” Econometrica, Vol.30, No.1, pp.34-53.
- 8. Fuss, M., D. McFadden ve Y. Mundlak (1978). “A survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production.” Production Econo-mics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applica-tions içinde. North-Holland
- 9. Marschak, J. ve W. H. Andrews (1944) “Ran-dom Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production” Econometrica, Vol. 12, No.3/4, pp.143-205.
- 10. Mundlak Y. (1963) “Estimation of Production and Behavioral Functions from a Combination of Cross-section and Time-series Data.” Measu-rement in Economics derleme içinde, Stanford University Press, 138-166
- 11. Mundlak Y. (1996) “Production Function Esti-mation: Reviving the Primal,” Econometrica, Vol.64, No.2, pp.431-438.
- 12. Mundlak, Y. ve I. Hoch (1965) “Consequences of Alternative Specifications in Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Functions,” Econo-metrica, Vol.33, No.4, pp.814-828.
- 13. Olley, G. S. ve A. Pakes (1996) “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry,” Econometrica, Vol.64, No.6, pp.1263-1297.
- 14. Robinson, P. M. (1988) “Root-N-Consistent Se-miparametric Regression,” Econometrica, Vol. 56, No.4, pp.931-954.
- 15. Romer, David (1996) Advanced Macroecono-mics . McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass.
- 16. Zellner, A., J. Kmenta, ve J. Dreze (1966) “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models,” Econometrica, Vol.34, No.4, pp.784-795.
Year 2006,
Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 23 - 31, 30.07.2006
Abstract
References
- 1. Ackerberg, D., L. Benkard, S. Berry ve A. Pa-kes (2005) “Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes,” yayınlanmamış çalışma.
- 2. Avralıoğlu, Zeki (1978). Üretim Fonksiyonları, Doktora Tezi, AİTİA Yayınları No:102
- 3. Barro, R. J. ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Econo-mic growth. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass.
- 4. Cobb, C. W. ve Douglas P. H. (1928) “A Theory of Production,” American Economic Review, Vol.18 (Supplement), 139-165.
- 5. Griliches, Z. (1980). “Returns to Research and Development Expenditures in the Private Sec-tor.” New Developments in Productivity Mea-surement J.W. Kendrick ve B. Vaccara tarafın-dan derlemede, Studies in Income and Wealth Vol.44 içinde, Chicago University Press, Chica-go
- 6. Griliches, Z. ve J. Mairesse (1998). “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” Eco-nometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Sym-posium içinde, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- 7. Hoch, I. (1962) “Estimation of Production Para-meters Using Time-Series and Cross-Section Data,” Econometrica, Vol.30, No.1, pp.34-53.
- 8. Fuss, M., D. McFadden ve Y. Mundlak (1978). “A survey of Functional Forms in the Economic Analysis of Production.” Production Econo-mics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applica-tions içinde. North-Holland
- 9. Marschak, J. ve W. H. Andrews (1944) “Ran-dom Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production” Econometrica, Vol. 12, No.3/4, pp.143-205.
- 10. Mundlak Y. (1963) “Estimation of Production and Behavioral Functions from a Combination of Cross-section and Time-series Data.” Measu-rement in Economics derleme içinde, Stanford University Press, 138-166
- 11. Mundlak Y. (1996) “Production Function Esti-mation: Reviving the Primal,” Econometrica, Vol.64, No.2, pp.431-438.
- 12. Mundlak, Y. ve I. Hoch (1965) “Consequences of Alternative Specifications in Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Functions,” Econo-metrica, Vol.33, No.4, pp.814-828.
- 13. Olley, G. S. ve A. Pakes (1996) “The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry,” Econometrica, Vol.64, No.6, pp.1263-1297.
- 14. Robinson, P. M. (1988) “Root-N-Consistent Se-miparametric Regression,” Econometrica, Vol. 56, No.4, pp.931-954.
- 15. Romer, David (1996) Advanced Macroecono-mics . McGraw-Hill, Boston, Mass.
- 16. Zellner, A., J. Kmenta, ve J. Dreze (1966) “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models,” Econometrica, Vol.34, No.4, pp.784-795.
There are 16 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 30, 2006 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2006 Volume: 4 Issue: 3 |