Uluslararası Hukukta Güvenlik Söylemleri: Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri İle Kesişen Düzlemler

Year 2021, Volume: 23 Issue: 1, 4 - 25, 28.06.2021

Gözde Turan

Abstract

Uluslararası hukuk alanındaki teorik yaklaşım farklılıkları, Uluslararası İlişkiler teorilerindeki tartışmalarla ortak bir izdüşüme sahiptir. Söz konusu izdüşüme ışık tutması açısından, çalışma, sadece dönemsel değil öne çıkan teorik perspektifler için de geçerli olan paralelliği, güvenlik söylemleri örneğinde ele alacaktır. Henüz modern anlamda uluslararası ilişkilerden bahsedilemeyecek olan Doğa Hukuku doktrininin etkin olduğu ilk dönemde, güvenlik algısı devletin ülkesi ile sınırlı görülmemiş, tehditin konusu da egemenlik ile ilişkilendirilmemiştir. Geleneksel Uluslararası İlişkiler teorilerinin etkin olduğu ulus-devlet sisteminde uluslararası hukuktaki teorik tartışmalar pozitivist/realist hukuk ve karşıtları arasında gelişmiştir. Son dönem, her iki disiplinde de meta-teorik tartışmaların ön plana çıktığı, güvenliğin tanımı ve içeriğinin ötesinde bizzat güvenlikleştirmenin sorunsallaştırıldığı dönem olmuştur. Uluslararası hukukun Uluslararası İlişkiler teorileri ile ilişkisinin güvenlik söylemi üzerinden incelenmesi, sadece dönemler arasındaki fay hatlarını değil, kesişme noktalarını da açığa çıkaracaktır. Bu ilişki, sadece uluslararası hukuk teorilerinin değil aynı zamanda Uluslararası İlişkiler teorilerinin de içinde geliştiği ve etkin olduğu çevre ile olan bağlarını güvenlik bağlamında ortaya koyması açısından önemlidir.

Keywords

uluslararası hukuk, güvenlik, Uluslararası İlişkiler teorileri, eleştirel hukuk çalışmaları

References

• Amnesty International. (2004). "So Does that Mean I Have Rights?": Protecting the Human Rights of Women and Girls Trafficked for Forced Prostitution in Kosovo, London, Amnesty International.
• Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London, Verso.
• Andreopoulos, G. J. (2004). Violations of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and Threats to International Peace and Security, Ramesh Thakur ve Peter Malcontent (Ed.), From Sovereign Impunity to International Accountability, The Search for Justice in a World of States, New York, United Nations University Press, 80-99.
• Armstrong, D., Farrell, T., ve Lambert, H. (2012). International Law and International Relations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Aroussi, S. (2011). ‘Women, Peace and Security’: Addressing Accountability for Wartime Sexual Violence, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13 (4), 576-593.
• Beck, R. J., Arend, A. J., ve Vander Lugt, R. D. (1996). International Rules: Approaches From International Law and International Relations, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Bederman, D. J. (2001). International Law in Antiquity, Cilt 16, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Bellamy, A. J. ve Williams, P. (2004). Introduction: Thinking Anew About Peace Operations, International Peacekeeping, 11 (1), 1-15.
• Borschberg, P. (2002). The Seizure of the Sta. Catarina Revisited: The Portuguese Empire in Asia, VOC Politics and the Origins of the Dutch-Johor Alliance (1602–c. 1616), Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 33 (1), 31–62.
• Brunnee, J. ve Toope, S. J. (2004). Canada and the Use of Force: Reclaiming Human Security, International Journal, 59 (2), 247-260.
• Buss, D. E. (2009). Rethinking ‘Rape as a Weapon of War’, Feminist Legal Studies, 17 (2), 145–163.
• Buzan, B., Wæver, O., ve De Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.
• Campbell, D. (1998). Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
• Chayes, A., Ehrlich, T. ve Lowenfeld, A. F. (1968). International Legal Process: Materials for an Introduction Course, Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
• Checkel, J. T. (1998). The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory, World Politics, 50 (2), 324-348.
• Chesterman, S. (2001). Just War or Just Peace?: Humanitarian Intervention and International Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Chimni, B. S. (2006). Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto, International Community Law Review, 8 (1), 3-27.
• Çelebi, H. ve Özdemir, A. M. (2010). Uluslararası Hukukta Eleştirel Yaklaşımlar, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 7 (25), 69-90.
• Davidson, S. (2005). International Law and the Suppresion of Maritime Violence, R. Burchill, N. D. White ve J. Murris (Ed.), International Conflict and Security Law: Essays in Memory of Hilaire McCoubrey, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 265-285.
• Dedring, J. (2008). United Nations Security Council in the 1990s, The Resurgence and Renewal, New York, SUNY Press.
• Demirli, A. ve Özdemir, A. M. (2019). Uluslararası Hukuku Dönemselleştirmek: Pozitivist Söylem ve Ötesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 16 (63), 51-67.
• Der Derian, J. ve Shapiro, M. J. (Ed.). (1989). International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, New York, Lexington Books.
• Durch, W. J., Holt, V. K., Earle, C. R. ve Shanahan, M. K. (Ed.). (2003). The Brahimi Report and the Future of the UN Peace Operations, Washington, Henri L. Stimson Center.
• Durch, W. J. (Ed.). (1993). The Evolution of UN Peacekeeping: Case Studies and Comparative Analysis, New York, St. Martin's Press.
• Von Einsiedel, S. ve Malone, D. (2018). Security Council, T. G. Weiss ve S. Daws (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook on the United Nations, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 142-172.
• Enerstvedt, O. M. (2017). Aviation Security, Privacy, Data Protection and Other Human Hights: Technologies and Legal Principles, Springer.
• Eskridge, W. N. ve Frickey, P. P. (1994). The Making of The Legal Process, Harvard Law Review, 107 (8), 2031-2055.
• Estrada-Tanck, D. (2013). Human Security and the Human Rights of Undocumented Migrants: Systemic Vulnerabilities and Obligations of Protection, European Journal of Social Security, 15 (2), 151-170.
• Evans, G. J. ve Sahnoun, M. (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Ottawa, International Development Research Centre.
• Goodwin-Gill, G. (2008). Forced Migration: Refugees, Rights and Security, J. McAdam (Ed.), Forced Migration, Human Rights and Security, Portland, Bloomsbury Publishing, 1-17.
• Grotius, H. (2005). Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace, R. Tuck (Ed.), Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
• Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, Harvard Law Review, 71 (4), 593-629.
• Hopf, T. (2010). The Logic of Habit in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, 16 (4), 539-561.
• Ihering, R. (1913). Law as a Means to an End, I. Husik (Çev.), New York, Macmillan.
• Jones, R. W. (1999). Security, Strategy, and Critical Theory, Boulder, Lynne Rienner.
• Kaldor, M. (1999). New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge, Polity Press.
• Kapur, R. (2005). Erotic Justice: Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism, London, Glasshouse.
• Khong, Y. F. (2001). Human Security: A Shotgun Approach to Alleviating Human Misery?, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 7 (3), 231-236.
• King, G. ve Murray, C. J. (2001). Rethinking Human Securit, Political Science Quarterly, 116 (4), 585-610.
• Koh, H. H. (1996). Transnational Legal Process, Nebraska Law Review, 75 (1), 181-207.
• Koh, H. H. (1997). Why Do Nations Obey International Law?, Yale Law Journal, 106 (8), 2599-2659.
• Koskenniemi, M. (1996). The Place of Law in Collective Security, Michigan Journal of International Law, 17 (2), 455-490.
• Koskenniemi, M. (2009). The Politics of International Law–20 years later, European Journal of International Law, 20 (1), 7-19.
• Korff, B. S. A. (1924). An Introduction to the History of International Law, American Journal of International Law, 18 (2), 246-259.
• Kratochwil, F. V. (1991). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Krause, K. ve Williams, M. C. (Ed.), (1997). Critical Security Studies, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
• Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era, International Studies Quarterly, 33 (3), 235-254.
• Lasswell, H. D. ve McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science and Policy, New Haven Press, New Haven.
• Machiavelli, N. (2008). The Prince, Cambridge, Hackett Publishing.
• Malanczuk, P. (2002). Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law, London, Routledge.
• March, J. G. ve Olsen, J. P. (2004). The Logic of Appropriateness, R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 479-498.
• Matsuda, M. J. (1987). Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 22 (2), 323-399.
• McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D. ve Reisman, W. (1968). Theories About International Law: Prologue to a Configurative Jurisprudence, Virginia Journal of International Law, 8 (2), 188-299.
• Meron, T. (2000). The Humanization of Humanitarian Law, American Journal of International Law, 94 (2), 239-278.
• Müller, H. (2004). Arguing, Bargaining and All That: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, 10 (3), 395-435.
• Myres, S. M. (1955). The Realist Theory in Pyrrhic Victory, American Journal of International Law, 49 (3), 376-378.
• Newman, S. (2010). Power and Politics in Poststructuralist Thought, London, Routledge.
• Nussbaum, A. (1954). A Concise History of the Law of Nations, New York, Macmillan.
• Oberleitner, G. (2005). Human Security: A Challenge to International Law?, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 11 (2), 185-203.
• O’Connell, M. E. (1999). New International Legal Process, The American Journal of International Law, 93 (2), 334-351.
• Okafor, O. C. (2008). Critical Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL): Theory, Methodology, or Both?, International Community Law Review, 10 (4), 371-378.
• Onuf, N. (2012). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, London, Routledge.
• Orford, A. (2003). Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Possony, S. T. (1945). Peace Enforcement, Yale Law Journal, 55 (5), 910-949.
• Price-Smith, A. T. (2002). The Health of Nations: Infectious Disease, Environmental Change, and Their Effects on National Security and Development, Cambridge, MIT Press.
• Pufendorf, S. (1994). The Political Writings of Samuel Pufendorf, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Purvis, N. (1991). Critical Legal Studies in Public International Law, Harvard International Law Journal, 32 (1), 81-109.
• Ramcharan, B. G. (2002). Human Rights and Human Security, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
• Ratner, S. R. ve Slaughter, A-M. (1999). Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers, American Journal of International Law, 93 (2), 291-302.
• Razack, S. (Ed.). (2002)., Race, Space, and the Law: Unmapping a White Settler Society, Toronto, Between the Lines.
• Razack, S. (2004). Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages, Feminist Legal Studies, 12 (2), 129-174.
• Reisman, M. (1981). International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication: The Harold D. Lasswell Memorial Lecture, ASIL Proceedings, 75, 101-120.
• Reisman, M. (1992). The View from the New Haven School of International Law, ASIL Proceedings, 86, 118-125.
• Richmond, O. P. (2004). UN Peace Operations and the Dilemmas of the Peacebuilding Consensus, International Peacekeeping, 11 (1), 83-101.
• Sebok, A. J. (1995). Misunderstanding Positivism, Michigan Law Review, 93 (7), 2054-2132.
• Shaw, T. M., MacLean, S. J. ve Black, D. R. (2016). Introduction: A Decade of Human Security: What Prospects for Global Governance and New Multilateralisms?, S. J. MacLean, D. R Black, T. M. Shaw, (Ed.), A Decade of Human Security: Global Governance and New Multilateralisms, London, Routledge, 3-18.
• Simpson, G. (2000). The Situation on the International Legal Theory Front: The Power of Rules and the Rule of Power, European Journal of International Law, 11 (2), 439-464.
• Skjelsbaek, I. (2001). Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship, European Journal of International Relations, 7 (2), 211-237.
• Slaughter, A-M. (1995). International Law in a World of Liberal States, European Journal of International Law, 6 (3), 503-538.
• Slaughter, A-M., Tulumello, A. S., ve Wood, S. (1998). International law and international relations theory: A new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship, American Journal of International Law, 367-397.
• Sriram, C. L. ve Youssef, M. (2006). Bringing Security Back In: International Relations Theory and Moving Beyond the “Justice Versus Peace” Dilemma in Transitional Societies, T. Biersteker, P. J. Spiro, C.L. Sriram, V. Raffo (Ed.), International Law and International Relations, New York, Routledge, 238-251.
• Thomas, C. (2000). Global Governance, Development and Human Security: The Challenge of Poverty and Inequality, London, Pluto.
• Tigerstrom, B. (2007). Human Security and International Law: Prospects and Problems, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
• Tomuschat, C. (2008). Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• Torroja, H. (Ed.). (2017). Public International Law and Human Rights Violations by Private Military and Security Companies, Springer International Publishing.
• Tuck, R. (2001). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• UN List of Peacekeeping Operations, 1948-2020, https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/un_peacekeeping_operation_list_3_2.pdf Erişim tarihi: 07 Şubat 2021.
• UN General Assembly Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change: "A more secure world : our shared responsibility", 2 December 2004, A/59/565
• UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Trafficking in Human Beings, Especially Women and Children, in Africa, Florence, 2003.
• Unger, R. M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement, Harvard law review, 96 (3), 561-675.
• Union of International Associations, (2002). Yearbook of International Organizations: Guide to Global Civil Society Networks 2002–2003, Cilt 5, Statistics, Visualizations and Patterns, Munich, K. G. Saur.
• United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report, 1994, New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.
• Vattel, E. D. (2008). The Law of Nations; or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
• Vitoria, F. (1991). Vitoria: Political Writings, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Waever, O. (1998). Four Meanings of International Society: A Transatlantic Dialogue, B. A. Roberson (Ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, London, Pinter, 80-144.
• Walker, R. B. J. (1995). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Weinrib, E. J. (1987). Legal Formalism: On the Immanent Rationality of Law, Yale Law Journal, 97 (6), 949-1016.
• White, N. D. (1990). Keeping the Peace: The United Nations and the Maintenance of International Peace and Security, Manchester, Manchester University Press.
• Wiessner, S. (1997). International Law in the 21st Century: Decisionmaking in Institutionalized and Non-Institutionalized Settings, Thesaurus Acroasium, 26, 129-153.
• Wiessner, S. ve Willard, A. R. (1999). Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence and Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflict: Toward a World Public Order of Human Dignity, The American Journal of International Law, 93 (2), 316-334.
• Wolff, C. F. (2017). The Law of Nations Treated According to the Scientific Method, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund.
• Wood, E. J. (2006). Variation in Sexual Violence During War, Politics and Society, 34 (3), 307-342.
• Yasuaki, O. (2003). International Law in and with International Politics: The Functions of International Law in International Society, European Journal of International Law, 14 (1), 105-139.
• Zarate, J. C. (1998). The Emergence of a New Dog of War: Private International Security Companies, International Law, and the New World Disorder, Stanford Journal of International Law, 34 (1), 75-162.