Türkiye’de Mesleki Eğitimde Paradigma Değişimi

Year 2020, Volume: 40 Issue: 2, 357 - 384, 06.08.2020

Mahmut Özer

https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.752523

Cited By: 25

Abstract

Mesleki eğitim tüm ülkelerde ekonomik kalkınmada çok önemli işlevler görmektedir. Diğer eğitim türlerinden farklı olarak iş piyasası ile güçlü bağı, mesleki eğitimi eğitim tartışmalarının sürekli gündeminde tutmuştur. Son yıllarda yapılan tartışmalara bakıldığında hemen hemen tüm ülkelerde mesleki eğitimin iki temel sorunla yüzleştiği görülmektedir. Birincisi, mesleki eğitimin akademik olarak görece başarılı öğrenciler tarafından tercih edilmemesi ve dolayısıyla bu okullarda çoğunlukla akademik olarak daha az başarılı öğrencilerin kümelenmesidir. İkinci sorun ise, üretim ve hizmet sektörlerinde otomasyon ve yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin yaygınlaşmasının iş piyasasında mesleki eğitimden beklenen beceri setlerinde ciddi dönüşümlere yol açmasıdır. Bu durumda mesleğe oldukça özgü eğitim veren mesleki eğitim sistemleri kendilerinden beklenen yeni beceri taleplerine cevap vermekte yetersiz kalmıştır. Bu iki sorunu çözmek için ülkeler mesleki eğitim sistemlerinde dönüşümler yapmaktadır. Yapılan dönüşümlerde iş piyasasında yeni ve hızla değişen koşullara adaptasyonu güçlendiren akademik ve genel becerilere daha fazla yer veren ve mesleklere özgü dar beceri setlerinden ziyade meslekler arası geçişi de kolaylaştıran daha genel bir mesleki eğitim ön plana çıkmaktadır. Yeni yaklaşım mesleki eğitimin hem iş piyasası hem de yükseköğretimle daha farklı ilişkiler kurmasını gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu sonrası mesleki eğitimde bu yeni duruma yönelik yapılan dönüşüm ayrıntı olarak ele alınmakta ve yapılan iyileştirmelere yer verilmektedir. Ayrıca, mesleki eğitimdeki iyileştirmelerin kalıcı hale gelebilmesi için iş piyasası ve yükseköğretim alanlarında atılması gereken adımlar ele alınmaktadır.

Keywords

mesleki eğitim, 2023 eğitim vizyonu, iş piyasası, yükseköğretim, istihdam

The Paradigm Shift in Vocational Education and Training in Turkey

Abstract

Vocational education and training (VET) has a crucial function in economic development of countries. In contrast with the other types of education, its strong relationship with the labor market maintains the main position of VET in educational discussions. The outcomes of discussions in recent years show that VET systems struggle with two major issues in most countries. First, VET is not preferred by the relatively high performing students and as a result, relatively low performing students are clustered in VET institutions. Secondly, the ever-growing use of automation and artificial intelligence technologies in production and service sectors leads to important transformations in the skills requested from VET to gain students. At this stage, VET systems which focus on the occupational specific skills have become inadequate to meet expectations towards new skills. Countries revise their VET systems to solve these two major issues. In these revisions, new VET approaches that focus more on the academic and general skills, which strengthen the adaptation skills of students to new conditions in labor market, and facilitate the transitions between occupations come to the fore rather than VET systems that focus on the occupation specific skills. Within the scope of new approach, VET needs to build distinctive relations with both the labor market and the higher education. This study aims to review the transition of Turkish VET system towards new approach after Education Vision 2023, and the improvements in VET that have been made in line with this purpose. In addition, improvements that need to be made in labor market and higher education system are evaluated to make the developments in VET permanent.

Keywords

Vocational education and training, Education Vision 2023, labor market, higher education, employment

References

• Acemoğlu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation and work. NBER Working Paper 24196. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
• Allmendinger, J. (1998). Educational systems and labour market outcomes. European Sociological Review, 5(3), 231-250.
• Bathmaker, A.M., Graf, L., Orr, K., Powell, J., Webb, S., & Wheelahan, L. (2018). Higher level vocational education: The route to high skills and productivity as well as greater equity? An international comparative analysis. In C. Nagele ve BE Stalder (Eds). Trends in vocational education and training research. Proceedings of the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), Vocational Education and Training Network (VETNET), pp. 53-60, Bern, CH: VETNET.
• Benovat, A. (1983). The rise and decline of vocational education. Sociology of Education, 56, 63-76.
• Bernardi, F., & Ballarino, G. (2016). Education, occupation and social origin: A comparative analysis of the transmission of socio-economic inequalities. Edwarg Elgar, Cheltenham.
• Bertocchi, G., & Spagat, M. (2004). The evolution of modern educational systems: Technical vs. general education, distributional conflict, and growth. J Dev Econ, 73, 559–582.
• Bol, T., & Van de Wefhorst, H.G. (2013a). The measurement of tracking, vocational orientation, and standardization of educational systems: A comparative approach. GINI Discussion Paper 81:1-42.
• Bol, T., & Van de Wefhorst, H.G. (2013b). Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity. Comparative Educational Review, 57(2), 285-308.
• Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: Brown RK (Ed) Knowledge, educational and cultural change, pp. 71–112. London, Tavistock.
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London, Sage Publications.
• Breen, R. (2010). Educational expansion and social mobility in the 20th century. Soc Forces, 89(2), 365–388.
• Breen, R., & Jonsson, J.O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annu Rev Sociol, 31, 223–243.
• Brunello, G. (2004). Stratified or comprehensive? Some economic considerations on the design of secondary education. CESifo DICE Report 4:7-10.
• Burgess, S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2020). Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. CEPR Policy Portal. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/impact-covid-19-education.
• Canbal, M.S., Kerkez, B., Suna, H.E., Numanoğlu, K.V., & Özer, M. (2020). Mesleki ve teknik ortaöğretimde paradigma değişimi için yeni bir adım: Eğitim programlarının güncellenmesi. Submitted to Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri: Teori ve Uygulama.
• Fuller, A. (2015). Vocational education. In: James D. Wright (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd edition), Vol.25, Oxford: Elsevier, pp.232-238.
• Gamaron, A., & Mare, R. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146-1183.
• Grubb, W.N. (1985). The convergence of educational systems and the role of vocationalism. Comparative Education Review, 29, 526-548. Günay, D., & Ozer, M. (2014). Türkiye’de meslek yüksekokulları, mevcut durum, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Ankara: Yükseköğretim Kurulu.
• Günay, D., & Ozer, M. (2016). Türkiye’de meslek yüksekokullarının 2000’li yıllardaki gelişimi ve mevcut zorluklar. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1), 1-12.
• Gür, B.S., Özoğlu, M., Akgeyik, T. et al (2012). Türkiye’nin insan kaynağının belirlenmesi. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Toplum Araştırmaları Vafkı (SETA). Ankara, Türkiye.
• Hanushek, E.A., & Woessmann, L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116, 63-76.
• Hanushek, E.A., Schwerdt, G., Woessman, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. The Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87.
• Iannelli, C., & Raffe, D. (2007). Vocational upper-secondary education and the transition from school. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 49-63.
• Marks, G.N. (2006). Are between-and within-school differences in student performance largely due to socioeconomic background? Evidence from 30 countries. Educational Research, 48(1), 21-40.
• Müller, W., & Shavit, Y. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of the stratification process. A comparative study of qualifications and occupations in thirteen countries. In: Shavit Y, Müller W (Eds), From school to work: A comparative study of educational qualifications and occupational destinations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 1-47.
• OECD (2018). Skills for jobs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2019). OECD skills strategy 2019-Turkey. Skills to shape a better future. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Ozer, M., Çavuşoğlu, A., & Gür, B. S. (2011). Restorasyon ve toparlanma dönemi: Mesleki ve teknik eğitimde 2000’li yıllar. In B. S. Gür (Ed.), 2000’li yıllar: Türkiye’de eğitim (pp. 163- 192). İstanbul: Meydan.
• Ozer, M. (2018). The 2023 Education Vision and new goals in vocational and technical education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 8(3), 425–435.
• Ozer, M. (2019a). Reconsidering the fundamental problems of vocational education and training in Turkey and proposed solutions for restructuring. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 39(2), 1–19.
• Ozer, M. (2019b). Background of problems in vocational education and training and its road map to solution in Turkey’s Education Vision 2023. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(1), 1–11.
• Ozer, M., & Perc, M. (2020). Dreams and realities of school tracking and vocational education. Palgrave Communications, 6, 34.
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2019). Future of vocational and technical education in Turkey: Solid steps taken after Education Vision 2023. Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(20), 165–192.
• Ozer, M., & Suna, H. E. (2020). The linkage between vocational education and labor market in Turkey: Employability and skill mismatch. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(2), 558–569.
• Ozer, M. (2020a). Vocational education and training as “A friend in need” during coronavirus pandemic in Turkey. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 1-7.
• Ozer, M. (2020b). The contribution of the strengthened capacity of vocational education and training system in Turkey to the fight against Covid-19. Journal of Higher Education, doi:10.2399/yod.20.726951, 1-7.
• Ozer, M. (2020c). Educational Policy Actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID-19 Pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1124-1129.
• Ozer, M. (2020d). What PISA tells us about performance of education systems?. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 217-228.
• Perc, M., Ozer, M., & Hojnik, J. (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communication 5, 61.
• Raffe, D. (2008). The concept of transition system. Journal of Education and Work, 21(4), 277-296.
• Reichelt, M., Collischon, M., & Eberl, A. (2019). School tracking and its role in social reproduction: Reinforcing educational inheritance and the direct effects of social origin. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(4), 1-26.
• Roemer, J.E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Sahlberg, P. (2007). Secondary education in OECD countries: Common challenges, differing solutions. European Training Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.etf.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/publications/secondary-education-oecd-countries-common-challenges.
• Shavit, Y. (1984). Tracking and the persistence of ethnic occupational inequalities in Israel. International Perspectives on Education and Society. Vol. 2. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press.
• Shavit, Y., & Müller, W. (2000). Vocational secondary education: Where diversion and where safety net? European Societies, 2(1), 29-50.
• Solga, H., Protsch, P., Ebner, C., & Brzinsky-Fay, C. (2014). The German vocational education and training system: Its institutional configuration, strength, and challenges. WZB Discussion Paper SP-I-2014-502.
• Suna, H.E., Tanberkan, H., Gur, B.S., Perc, M., & Ozer, M. (2020). Socioeconomic status and school type as predictors of academic achievement, Journal of Economy Culture and Society, https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2019-0034.
• Trow, M. (1961). The second transformation of American secondary education. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 2, 144-166. Woessmann, L. (2009). International evidence on school tracking: A review. CESifo DICE Report 1:26-34.
• Wolter, S.C., & Ryan, P. (2011). Apprenticeship. In: EA Hanushek, S Machin, & L Woessman (Eds), Handbooks of economics (Vol.3) , pp.521-576, The Netherlands.
• Zimmer, R. (2003). A new twist in the educational tracking debate. Economics of Education Review, 22(3), 307-315.