Dijital Bağımlılıkla Mücadele için Bir Öneri: Disiplinler Arası İşbirlikli Müdahale Modeli (DAİMM)

Year 2023, Volume: 2023 Issue: 20, 202 - 253, 29.03.2023

Betül Aydın S. Sadi Seferoğlu

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1210734

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Dijital bağımlılık özellikle ergenlerde ve üniversite öğrencilerinde, önceki kuşaklara oranla artan bir ivmeyle kendisini gösteren bir bağımlılık türüdür. Dijital bağımlılık (DB), bireylerin yaşam kalitesini, fizyolojik, psikolojik sağlığını ve akademik hayatını tehdit eden bir problem olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu durumun bilinen ve halen keşfedilmeyi bekleyen psiko-sosyal nedenleri bulunmaktadır. Bireyler dijital teknolojilerle yoğun etkileşim içinde bulundukları zamanlarda çok sayıda risk ve tehdit unsuruyla karşılaşabilirler. Benzer şekilde bazı bireyler bu ortamlarda problemli davranışlar gösterebilmektedirler. Bu bağlamda alanyazında dijital bağımlılığa yönelik etkinliği ispatlanmış çeşitli çözüm önerileri yer almaktadır. Bu çalışma kapsamında bu çözüm önerileri odak alınarak kapsamlı bir alanyazın taraması gerçekleştirilmiş ve bunun sonucunda bütüncül ve işbirlikli modellere ihtiyaç duyulduğu öngörülmüştür. Bu ihtiyacı gidermek amacıyla, “psikiyatrist, klinik psikolog, psikolojik danışmanlık ve rehberlik, öğretim tasarımı ve dijital güvenlik olmak üzere beş farklı alanda akademik çalışmaları bulunan 12 farklı uzmanla, dijital bağımlılıkla mücadele modelinin paydaşlarının rolleri ve sorumlulukları hakkında soruların yer aldığı yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda dijital bağımlılıkla disiplinler arası işbirlikli mücadele başlıklı bir model önerilmiştir. Modelde ayrıca modelin paydaşları ve argümanlarına yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur. Sonuç olarak bu çalışma kapsamında, dijital bağımlılık ile mücadele sürecine farklı bir bakış açısı getirilerek müdahale aşamalarına yönelik öneriler geliştirilmiştir.

Keywords

Dijital Bağımlılık, Disiplinler Arası İşbirliği, Müdahale Modeli

Thanks

Bu araştırmaya gönüllü katılım gösteren uzmanlara sundukları önemli katkılar için teşekkür ederiz.

A Suggestion for Combating Digital Addiction: An Interdisciplinary Collaborative Intervention Model (CoDAIM)

Abstract

Digital addiction is a type of addiction that is showing itself with increasing momentum, particularly among teenagers and university students, compared to previous generations. Digital addiction (DA) is considered a problem that threatens individuals' life quality, physiological, psychological health and academic life. There are known and still unexplored psycho-social causes of this phenomenon. Individuals can encounter wide variety of risk and threat factors when they are intensely interacting with digital technologies. Similarly, some individuals can exhibit problematic behaviors in these environments. In this context, there are various proposed solutions with proven effectiveness in the literature for addressing digital addiction. In this study, a comprehensive literature review was conducted focusing on these proposed solutions and concluded that a holistic and collaborative approach is needed. Considering this need, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 experts from five different areas who have conducted academic research (psychiatry, clinical psychology, psychological counseling and guidance, instructional design, and digital security) on the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in the digital addiction intervention model. As a result of the study, an interdisciplinary collaborative model against digital addiction was proposed. The model also includes suggestions for stakeholders and arguments. As a result of this study, a new perspective was brought to the digital addiction intervention process and proposals for intervention stages were developed.

Keywords

Digital Addiction, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Intervention Model

References

• Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Song, L. (2022). Digital addiction. American Economic Review, 112(7), 2424-63.
• Almourad, M. B., McAlaney, J., Skinner, T., Pleya, M., & Ali, R. (2020). Defining digital addiction: Key features from the literature. Psihologija, 53(3), 237-253.
• Alrobai, A., McAlaney, J., Phalp, K., & Ali, R. (2019). Exploring the risk factors of interactive e-health interventions for digital addiction. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Multigenerational online behavior and media use: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 390–405). Information Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7909-0.ch021
• Arató, N., Zsidó, A. N., Rivnyák, A., Péley, B., & Lábadi, B. (2022). Risk and protective factors in cyberbullying: the role of family, social support and emotion regulation. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4(2), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00097-4
• Baciu, A. B. (2020). Medical and social consequences of digital addiction. Medical Anthropology, The Publishing House of the Romanian Academy, 22 (3), 141-147.
• Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
• Beard, K. W., & Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 4(3), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210286
• Bozkurt, O. (2015). Madde bağımlısı bireylerin bağımlılık süreçlerinde ailenin etkisi [The effect of the family on the addiction processes of substance addicted individuals]. (Unpublished master's thesis). Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. PegemA.
• Brackett, C. D., Duncan, M., Wagner, J. F., Fineberg, L., & Kraft, S. (2022). Multidisciplinary treatment of opioid use disorder in primary care using the collaborative care model. Substance Abuse, 43(1), 240-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2021.1932698
• Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 591(1), 98-124.
• Cemiloglu, D., Almourad, M. B., McAlaney, J., & Ali, R. (2022). Combating digital addiction: Current approaches and future directions. Technology in Society, 68, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101832
• Cerniglia, L., Zoratto, F., Cimino, S., Laviola, G., Ammaniti, M., & Adriani, W. (2017). Internet addiction in adolescence: Neurobiological, psychosocial and clinical issues. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 76, 174-184.
• Cham, S., Algashami, A., Aldhayan, M., McAlaney, J., Phalp, K., Almourad, M. B., & Ali, R. (2019). Digital addiction: Negative life experiences and potential for technology-assisted solutions. In Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S., (Eds), World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 921-931). Springer, Cham.
• Cham, S., M., McAlaney, J., & Ali R. (2018). Digital addiction research. [Online presentation]. UK 2018 Bournemouth University. Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/about-bournemouth-university
• Chau, C. L., Tsui, Y. Y. Y., & Cheng, C. (2019). Gamification for internet gaming disorder prevention: Evaluation of a Wise IT-Use (WIT) Program for Hong Kong primary students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2468.
• Chemnad, K., Alshakhsi, S., Al-Harahsheh, S., Abdelmoneium, A. O., Al-Khalaf, M. S., Baghdady, A., & Ali, R. (2022). Is it contagious? Does parents’ internet addiction impact their adolescents’ internet addiction? Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221117408
• Chen, C. Y., Chen, I. H., Pakpour, A. H., Lin, C. Y., & Griffiths, M. D. (2021). Internet-related behaviors and psychological distress among schoolchildren during the COVID-19 school hiatus. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(10), 654-663.
• Chou, C., Condron, L., & Belland, J. C. (2005). A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational psychology review, 17(4), 363-388.
• Chung, S., Lee, J., & Lee, H. K. (2019). Personal factors, internet characteristics, and environmental factors contributing to adolescent internet addiction: A public health perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4635.
• Dodge, Krantz, B., & Kenny, 2010). How can we begin to measure recovery? Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 5(1), 1-7.).
• Drabble, L., & Poole, N. (2011). Collaboration between addiction treatment and child welfare fields: Opportunities in a Canadian context. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 11(2), 124-149.
• Dresp-Langley, B., & Hutt, A. (2022). Digital addiction and sleep. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6910.
• Ertemel, A. V., & Aydın, G. (2018). Dijital ekonomide teknoloji bağımlılığı ve çözüm önerileri. [Technology addiction in the digital economy and solution suggestions]. Addicta-The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(4), 683-690. https://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.4.0038
• Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2013). Problematic computer game use among adolescents, younger and older adults. Addiction, 108(3), 592-599.
• Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Health, 2013, 1-55.
• García, C. L., Sánchez, M. C., & Repiso, A. G. V. M. (2022). Internet addiction: Processes for the creation of educational prevention project–new approach based on digital competence. Journal of Information Technology Research (JITR), 15(1), 1-12.
• Ghadampour, E., Khodarahimi, S., Rahmian Bougar, M., & Nahaboo, S. (2020). Single mothers’ attachment styles and personality influences on child psychopathology. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 48(4), 340-355.
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112.
• Griffiths, M. (2000). Internet addiction-time to be taken seriously? Addiction Research, 8(5), 413-418.
• Günüç, S. (2009). İnternet bağımlılık ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve bazı demografik değişkenler ile internet bağımlılığı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Developing the internet addiction scale and examining the relationships between some demographic variables and internet addiction]. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Yüzüncüyıl University. Institute of Social Sciences.
• Hellfeldt, K., López-Romero, L., & Andershed, H. (2020). Cyberbullying and psychological well-being in young adolescence: the potential protective mediation effects of social support from family, friends, and teachers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 45.
• Hiniker, A., Hong, S., Kohno, T., & Kientz, J. A. (2016). MyTime: designing and evaluating an intervention for smartphone non-use. Paper presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose California USA. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2858036.2858403
• Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.
• Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(1).
• Jessor, R. (1987). Problem‐behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British Journal of Addiction, 82(4), 331-342.
• Juhnke, G. A., & Hagedorn, W. B. (2013). Counseling addicted families: An integrated assessment and treatment model. Routledge.
• Kesici, A., & Tunç, N. F. (2018). Investigating the digital addiction level of the university students according to their purposes for using digital tools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 235-241.
• Khang, H., Kim, J. K., & Kim, Y. (2013). Self-traits and motivations as antecedents of digital media flow and addiction: The Internet, mobile phones, and video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2416-2424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.027
• Kim, E. Y., Lee, Y. S., Han, D. H., Suh, D. S., & Kee, B. S. (2006). Temperament and genetic polymorphism in Korean male adolescents with internet addiction tendency. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, 468-475.
• Kim, J., Park, J., Lee, H., Ko, M., & Lee, U. (2019). LocknType: Lockout task intervention for discouraging smartphone app use. Paper presented at the CHI 2019 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow Scotland, UK. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300927
• Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Communication and information: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. CHI98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles California, USA. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/274644.274695
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications.
• Lane, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Huang, C. L., & Chang, Y. H. (2021). An investigation into smartphone addiction with personality and sleep quality among university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7588.
• Lederman, L. C., & Stewart, L. (2005). Changing the culture of college drinking: A socially situated health communication campaign. Hampton Press (NJ).
• Lee, C. T., Chen, T. W., Yu, Y. F., Strong, C., Lin, C. Y., Chang, Y. H., Yi, P.H., Yi, C. L., Herrera, J. J. U., & Tsai, M. C. (2022). Reciprocal peer network processes on substance use and delinquent behavior in adolescence: Analysis from a Longitudinal Youth Cohort Study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00904-z
• Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221-227.
• Liu, Q. X., Fang, X. Y., Deng, L. Y., & Zhang, J. T. (2012). Parent–adolescent communication, parental Internet use and Internet-specific norms and pathological Internet use among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1269-1275.
• Meng, S. Q., Cheng, J. L., Li, Y. Y., Yang, X. Q., Zheng, J. W., Chang, X. W., Shi, Y., Chen, Y., Lu, L., Sun, Y., Bao, Y. P., & Shi, J. (2022). Global prevalence of digital addiction in general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 92, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102128
• Mitchell, S. N., Reilly, R. C., & Logue, M. E. (2009). Benefits of collaborative action research for the beginning teacher. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 344-349.
• Mo, P. K., Chan, V. W., Wang, X., & Lau, J. T. (2020). Gender difference in the association between internet addiction, self-esteem and academic aspirations among adolescents: A structural equation modelling. Computers & Education, 155, 103921.
• Odacı, H. (2013). Risk-taking behavior and academic self-efficacy as variables accounting for problematic internet use in adolescent university students. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(1), 183-187.
• Osilla, K. C., Rodriguez, L. M., Neighbors, C., & Pedersen, E. R. (2022). Effects of a web-based intervention in reducing drinking among concerned partners of military service members and veterans. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 11(1), 4.
• Rahman, A. A. A. O. A., & Marzouk, H. K. (2020). Effect of an educational program on improving the extent of mental health literacy about depression, suicide and internet addiction among colleges students at Assiut University. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 11(3), 732-750.
• Shapira, N. A., Goldsmith, T. D., Keck Jr, P. E., Khosla, U. M., & McElroy, S. L. (2000). Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 57(1-3), 267-272.
• Singh, L. K., Suchandra, K. H. H., Pattajoshi, A., Mamidipalli, S. S., Kamal, H., Singh, S., Sachacher, B., & Mehta, V. (2019). Internet addiction and daytime sleepiness among professionals in India: A web-based survey. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(3), 265.
• Streit, C., Carlo, G., Ispa, J. M., & Palermo, F. (2021). Direct and indirect relations between family conflict and youth's later behavioral outcomes. Social Development, 30(2), 482-495.
• Taştepe, N. (2019). Orexin-A, neuropeptide Y, ghrelin, substance P, brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with internet addiction: a new approach to internet addiction with different mechanisms in different psychiatric conditions. (Medical specialization thesis). Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Diseases.
• Torres-Rodríguez, A., Griffiths, M. D., Carbonell, X., Farriols-Hernando, N., & Torres-Jimenez, E. (2019). Internet gaming disorder treatment: A case study evaluation of four different types of adolescent problematic gamers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(1), 1-12.
• Tracy, E. M., Munson, M. R., Peterson, L. T., & Floersch, J. E. (2010). Social support: A mixed blessing for women in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 10(3), 257-282.
• Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1996). Computer based Delphi processes. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, 56-85.
• Valencia-Ortiz, R., Cabero-Almenara, J., & Ruiz, U. G. (2021). Perception of trainers and students on the measures to be taken to solve the addiction of young people to social networks. Digital Education Review, 39, 141-158.
• Van Den Eijnden, R. J., Spijkerman, R., Vermulst, A. A., van Rooij, T. J., & Engels, R. C. (2010). Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent–child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(1), 77-89.
• Wąsiński, A., & Tomczyk, Ł. (2015). Factors reducing the risk of internet addiction in young people in their home environment. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 68-74.
• Williams, R. E., & Kraft, J. S. (2012). The mindfulness workbook for addiction: A guide to coping with the grief, stress and anger that trigger addictive behaviors. New Harbinger Publications.
• Xu, J., Shen, L. X., Yan, C. H., Hu, H., Yang, F., Wang, L., & Shen, X. M. (2012). Personal characteristics related to the risk of adolescent internet addiction: a survey in Shanghai, China. BMC public health, 12, 1-10.
• Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the Internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79(3), 899-902.
• Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. John Wiley & Sons.
• Young, K. S. (2004). Internet addiction: A new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(4), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204270278
• Young, K. S. (2017). The evolution of internet addiction disorder. Internet Addiction, 3-18.
• Zhu, J., Zhang, W., Yu, C., & Bao, Z. (2015). Early adolescent Internet game addiction in context: How parents, school, and peers impact youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.079
• Zounek, J., Juhaňák, L., & Záleská, K. (2022). Home use of digital technologies by teens: The role of family, school, and peers. In Life and Learning of Digital Teens Young People and Learning Processes in School and Everyday Life (105-124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90040-3_5