Residential Building Envelope Alternatives with Equivalent Cost

Year 2011, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 355 - 363, 05.04.2011

Esra Bostancıoglu

Abstract

Selecting the optimum envelope alternative in buildings is one of the most important factors in ensuring thermal comfort. This study calculated the heating costs, construction and lifecycle costs for a residential building in Istanbul with different envelope alternatives created by changing the type and thickness of the body and insulation materials used in the walls and roof, which are the structural components forming the building envelope. Envelope alternatives with equivalent costs were determined and evaluated. Hence, materials with varying properties and thicknesses were able to yield the same performance in terms of lifecycle and heating costs.

Keywords

energy efficiency, envelope design, envelope alternatives with equivalent cost, life cycle cost, heating cost.

References

• Tubitak, Panel of Energy and Natural Resources, Preliminary Report, Ankara, (2003).
• Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice A Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community 2001-2010. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/6eapbooklet _en.pdf)
• Bakos, G.C., “Insulation protection studies for energy saving in residential and tertiary sector”, Energy Buildings, 31: 251-259, (2000).
• Sezer, F.S., “Progress of Thermal Insulation Systems in Turkey and Exterior Wall Insulation Systems in Dwellings”, Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 10(2): 79-85, (2005).
• Bolatturk, A., “Optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to cooling and heating degree-hours in the warmest zone of Turkey”, Building and Environment, 43: 1055-1064, (2008).
• Kaynakli, O., “A study on residential heating energy requirement and optimum insulation thickness”, Renewable Energy, 33(6): 1164-1172, (2008).
• Kaynakli, O., Yamankaradeniz, R., “Heating Process and calculation of optimum insulation thickness”, VIIIth National Sanitary Engineering Congress, 187-195, (2007).
• Kaynakli, O., Yamankaradeniz, R., “Heating Process and calculation of optimum insulation thickness”, UCTEA Chamber of Mechanical Engineers Brance of Istanbul, Periodical of H.V.A.C. and Sanitary Engineering, 104: 22-28, (2007). (http://www.mmo.istanbul.org/yayin/tesisat/104/3)
• Aksoy, U.T., Kelesoglu, O., “Effects of building envelope surface area and insulation thickness on heating cost ”, Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 22(1): 103-109, (2007).
• Sisman, N., Kahya, E., Aras, N., Aras, H., “Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses of the external walls and roof (ceiling) for Turkey’s different degree-day regions”, Energy Policy, 35(10): 5151-5155, (2007).
• Bolatturk, A., “Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 26: 1301-1309, (2006).
• Aytac, A., Aksoy, U.T., “The relation between optimum insulation thickness and heating cost on external walls for energy saving”, Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 21(4): 753-758, (2006).
• Golcu, M., Dombayci, O.A., Abalı, S., “The effect and results of the optimum insulation thickness on energy saving for Denizli”, Journal of The Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 21(4): 639-644, (2006).
• Dombayci, O.A., Golcu, M., Pancar, Y., “Optimization of insulation thickness for external walls using different energy-sources”, Applied Energy, 83(9): 921-928, (2006).
• Ozel, M., Pihtili, K., “An Investigation for the effect of different positions of insulation applying building walls on the heat gain and losses”, Dokuz Eylul University Engineering Faculty Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(1): 87-97, (2005).
• Comakli, K., Yuksel, B., “Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving”, Applied Thermal Engineering, 23(4): 473-479, (2003).
• Al-Sanea, S.A., "Thermal performance of building roof elements”, Building and Environment, 37(7), 665-675, (2002).
• Hasan, A., “Optimum insulation thickness for buildings using life-cycle cost”, Applied Energy, 63: 115-124, (1999).
• Karagoz, N., “Investigation and Evaluation of Thermal Insulation Between Two Walls in Dwellings”, Master Thesis, Institue of Science and Technology, Uludag University, Bursa, (2004).
• Akcali, U., 2007 Construction Unit Price Analysis, Safak Press Ltd., Ankara, (2007).
• The library of construction and installation unit prices in Turkey, web page, http://www.birimfiyat.net(2009).
• Turkish Standards Institution (TSE), “Thermal Insulation Requirements for Buildings”, TS 825, Ankara, Turkey, 35-51 (2008).
• Manioglu, G., “Heating Energy Economics and Life Cycle Cost”, Ph.D. Thesis, Institue of Science and Technology, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, (2002).
• NBS Handbook 13, Energy Conservation in
• Building: An Economics Guidebook for Investment Decisions, U.S. Departement of Commerce, (1980).
• Life Cycle Cost Analysis Handbook, State of Alaska- Department of Education and Early Development, 1st edition, State of Alaska, (1999). (http://www.eed.state.ak.us/facilities/publications/L CCAHandbook1999.pdf) [26] Izoder,
• Association of Thermal Insulation,
• Waterproofing, Sound Insulation and Fireproofing
• Material Producers, Suppliers and Applicators, web
• page, http://www.izoder.org.tr, (2008).
• Technical Principles of Designing Heating System Projects, UCTEA Chamber of Mechanical Engineers Publication, 9th Edition, Istanbul, (1992).
• Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, web page, http://evds.tcmb.gov.tr(2009).