KUŞAKLARARASI İŞBİRLİĞİ VE GERONTEKNOLOJİ

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 11, 445 - 472, 12.09.2017

Oya Hazer Fahri Özsungur

Abstract

Bu makalede geronteknolojide kuşaklararası işbirliği konusu araştırılmış, gruplar arası teorik yaklaşımlar ve eğitim faktörü birlikte değerlendirilerek kuşaklararasındaki uyum ve işbirliği için öneriler ortaya konulmuştur. Geronteknolojide kuşaklararası işbirliğinin önemi ortaya çıkarılmış, işbirliği programları ve gruplar arası teorik yaklaşımlar ile konu önemli ve farklı bir boyutta incelenmiştir. Geronteknolojide bilginin önemi ortaya konularak, örgün ve yaygın eğitim ile farkındalık yaratılması gerektiği konusu üzerinde durulmuştur. Konu hakkında yapılmış nitel ve nicel araştırmalar birlikte değerlendirilmiş, geronteknolojinin kuşaklararası işbirliği ile birlikte düşünülmesi gerektiği, geronteknoloji ve kuşaklararası işbirliği için örgün ve yaygın eğitimin önemi vurgulanmıştır. 

Keywords

Geronteknoloji, gerontoloji, kuşaklararası işbirliği, işbirliği programları

INTERGENERATIONAL COOPERATION AND GERONTECHNOLOGY

Abstract

Intergenerational cooperation subject is researched in this article, suggestions are revealed for conformity and cooperation on intergeneration with both evaluating intergroup theoric approaches and education factor. Importance of intergenerational cooperation in gerontechnology is revealed, the subject is researched in significant and varied dimension with cooperation programs and intergroup theoric approaches. Importance of knowledge in gerontechnology is revealed, dwelled on awareness raising with formal and informal education subject. It is utilized with both qualitative and quantitative researches about subject, gerontechnology should be considered with intergenerational cooperation, it is emphasised importance of formal and informal education for gerontechnology and intergenerational cooperation.

Keywords

Gerontechnology, gerontology, i ntergenerational cooperation, cooperation programs

References

• Allen, V. L., Newtson, D. L. (1968). Conformity, Anticonformity and Independence, University of Wisconsin—Madison.
• Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion, Springer Science ve Business Media.
• Bauer, M., Chytilová, J., Pertold-Gebicka, B. (2014). Parental background and other-regarding preferences in children. Experimental Economics, 17, ss. 24-46.
• Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. (2007).Social Psychology and Human Nature, Brief Version, Cengage Learning.
• Bengtson, V. L., Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, ss. 856-870.
• Berg, P. v. d., Kemperman A., Kleijn, B. d., Borgers, A. (2016). Ageing and loneliness: The role of mobility and the built environment, Travel Behaviour and Society, 5, ss. 48–55.
• Bingöl, D (2014). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta, İstanbul.
• Bouma, Herman (1992). Gerontechnology: making technology relevant for the elderly. Herman Bouma and Jan A. M. Graafmans (eds.), “Gerontechnology” içinde, Amsterdam: IOS Press, ss. 1–5.
• Brewer M. B., Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and Intergroup Attitudes: East African Evidence,Sage Publications.
• Campbell, D. T., Baum, J. A. C., McKelvey, B. (1999). Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of Donald T Campbell, Sage.
• Campbell, R. L. (2006). Alturism in Auguste Comte and Ayn Rand, The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies, 7, No. 2, ss. 357–369.
• Campbell, A. L. (2009): Is the Economic Crisis Driving Wedges Between Young and Old? Rich and Poor? Generations –Journal of the American Society on Ageing, 33, No. 3, ss. 47–53.
• Chua, P.-H., Jung, Y., Lwin, M. O., Theng, Y.-L. (2013). Computers in Human Behavior, 29, ss. 2303–2311.
• Collins, R. (1979). The Credential Society: a Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. Academic Press, New York.
• Craighead, W. E., Nemeroff, C. B. (2001). The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science: Third Edition, 2, John Wiley ve Sons.
• Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., Goldsmith, H. H. (2003). Handbook of Affective Sciences, Oxford University Press.
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35 (8), ss. 982–1003.
• Deist, F. L., Latouille, M. (2016). Acceptability Conditions for Telemonitoring Gerontechnology in the Elderly Optimising the Development and Use of This New Technology, IRBM 37, 284–288.
• Deutsch, M., Gerard, H. B. (1955). A Study of Normative and İnformational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (3), ss. 629-636.
• Doh, H. S., Kim, M. J., Shin, N., Song: M., Lee, W. K., Kim: (2016). The effectiveness of a parenting education program based on respected parents ve respected children for mothers of preschool-aged children, Children and Youth Services Review, 68, ss. 11–124.
• Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression, New Haven, Yale University Press, Conn.
• Egolf, D. B. (2001). Forming Storming Norming Performing: Successful Communications in Groups and Teams, Writers Club Press.
• Eysenck, M. W. (2005). Psychology for AS Level, Taylor ve Francis.
• Eysenck, M. W. (2015). AQA Psychology: AS and A-level Year 1: Sixth Edition, Psychology Press.
• Festinger, L. (1950). Theory and Experiment in Social Communication, Research Center for Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
• Fozard, J. L., Rietsema, J., Bouma, H., Graafmans, J. A. M. (2000). Gerontechnology: Creating Enabling Environments for The Challenges and Opportunities Of Aging, Educational Gerontology, 26 (4), ss. 331-344, DOI:10.1080/036012700407820.
• Friebe, J., Hertha, B. S. (2013). Activities and barriers to education for elderly people, Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 1, ss. 10-26.
• Gass, R. H., Seiter, J. S. (2014). Persuasion: Social Influence and Compliance Gaining, Routledge.
• Gerard, H., Miller, N. (1975). School Desegregation, Springer Science ve Business Media.
• Gerontechnology (2016). An Innovative Gerontechnology Program: A Distinctive Intergenerational Computing Approach, http://www.csis.pace.edu/gerontechnology/ (09.07.2016).
• Gibbons, M., Philips, G. (1982). Self-Education: The Process of Life-Long Learning, Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 7 (4), ss. 67-86.
• Gilbert, D.,Fiske, T., Lindzey, G. (1998). The Handbook of Social Psychology, Mass.
• Giles, H., Gasiorek, J. (2010). Intergenerational communication practices. K. W. Schaie ve S. L. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (ss. 233-248), Academic Press, US.
• Giles, H., Noels, K. A., Williams, A., Ota, H., Lim, T. S., Ng: H., Ryan, E. B., Somera, L. (2003). Intergenerational communication across cultures: Young people’s perceptions of conversations with family elders, non-family elders and same-agepeers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 18 (1), ss. 1–32.
• Glass, A. P., Plaats, R. S. V. (2013). A conceptual model for aging better together intentionally, Journal of Aging Studies, 27, ss. 428–442.
• Glasser, T. L., Salmon, C. T. (1995). Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, Guilford Press.
• Hamada, K., Yanagihara, M. (2016). Intergenerational altruism and the transfer paradox in an overlapping generations model, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, ss. 161–167.
• Hamzah: R., Suandi, T., Krauss: E., Hamzah, A., Tamam, E. (2014). Youth hedonistic behaviour: moderating role of peer attachment on the effect of religiosity and worldview, International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 19 (4), ss.419-433, DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2014.942793.
• Hassin, R. R., Ochsner, K. N., Trope, Y. (2010).Self Control in Society, Mind, and Brain, Oxford University Press.
• Heider, F. (2012).The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, Psychology Press.Historypin (2013). Historypin in the Community, http://about.historypin.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Historypin_in_the_community_sm.pdf (10.06.2016).
• Hjälm, A. (2012). “Because we know our limits”: Elderly parents' views on intergenerational proximity and intimacy, Journal of Aging Studies, 26, ss. 296 –308.
• Hummert, M. L. (2010). Age group identities, stereotypes, and communication. H. Giles: A. Reid, ve J. Harwood (Eds.), “The dynamics of intergroup communication” içinde. Lang, New York, ss. 42–52.
• Insko, C. A., Schopler, J. (2013). Experimental Social Psychology: Text with Illustrative Readings, Academic Press, NY.
• Insko, C. A., Schopler, J. (1972). Experimental Social Psychology: Text with Illustrative Readings, Academic Press, NY.
• Izuhara, M. (2010). New patterns of family reciprocity policy challenges in ageing societies, M. Izuhara (ed.), Aging and intergenerational relations, Family reciprocity from a global perspective (ss.), UK, The Policy Press.
• Jarrott: E. (2010). Programs that affect intergenerational solidarity, M. A. C. Saco: Zelenev (Ed.), Intergenerational Solidarity, Strengthening Economic and social ties (ss. 113-127), NY, Palgrave
• Macmillan.Javrh, P., Kalin, J. (2010). Critically responsible teachers, schools’ modernisation and intergenerational cooperation, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, ss. 5006 –5011.
• Kaplan, M., Sanchez, M., Shelton, C., Bradley, L. (2013). Using Technology to Connect Generations. Profiles of Highlighted Programs. University Park, PA: Penn State University ve Washington D.C.: Generations United, http://extension.psu.edu/youth/intergenerational/program-areas/technology, ET: 09.07.2016.
• Kaspar, R. (2004). Technology and Loneliness in Old Age. Gerontechnology, 3 (1), ss. 42-48.
• Kassinove, H. (2013). Anger Disorders: Definition, Diagnosis, And Treatment, Taylor ve Francis.
• Kohn, M. L. (1977). Class and Conformity: a Study in Values: With a Reassessment, Second Ed., The University of Chicago Press, USA. Kristjánsson, K. (2008). Hiltonism, hedonism and the self, Ethics and Education, 3 (1), ss. 3-14, DOI: 10.1080/17449640802015194.
• Kruglanski, A. W., Stroebe, W. (2011). Handbook of The History of Social Psychology, Psychology Press.
• Large, A., Nesset, V.,Beheshti, J., Bowler, L. (2006). bBonded designQ: A novel approach to intergenerational information technology design, Library ve Information Science Research, 28, ss. 64 –82.
• Levine, J. M. (2013).Group Processes, Psychology Press.Majumdar, R. (2005). Marketing Research -Text, Applications And Case Studies, New Age International.
• MacCallum, J., Palmer, D., Wright, P., Potvin, W. C., Brooker, M., Tero, C. (2010). Australian Perspectives: Community Building Through Intergenerational Exchange Programs, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 8 (2), ss. 113-127, DOI: 10.1080/15350771003741899.
• Melo, R. C., Silva, M. J., Parreira, P. (2014). Effective leadership: Competing Values Framework, Centeris 2014 -Conference on Enterprise Information Systems / Projman 2014 -International Conference on Project Management / HCIST 2014 -International Conference on Health and Social Care Information Systems and Technologies, Procedia Technology, 16, ss. 921 –928.
• Merz, E. M., Schuengel, C., Schulze, H. J. (2007). Intergenerational solidarity: An attachment perspective, Journal of Aging Studies, 21, ss. 175–186.
• Mukherjee: (2016). Leadership network and team performance in interactive contests, Social Networks, 47, ss.85–92. Murayama, Y., Yasunaga, H. O. M., Nonaka, K., Takeuchi, R., Nishi, M., Sakuma, N., Uchida, H., Shinkai:, Fujiwara, Y. (2015). The effect of intergenerational programs on the mental health of elderly adults, Aging ve Mental Health, 19 (4), ss. 306-314, DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2014.933309
• Nielsen,W. R., Saccoman, J. L., Nykodym, N. (1995)."Individual influence in organizational change", Leadership ve Organization Development Journal, 16 (1), ss. 35 -39: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437739510076458.
• Paulus, P. B. (1989).Psychology of Group Influence: Second Edition, Psychology Press.
• Pecchioni, L. L., Wright, K. B, Nussbaum, J. F. (2005). Life-Span Communication. L. E. A., NewJersey.
• Petersen, J., Thielke:, Austin, D., Kaye, J. (2015): Phone behaviour and its relationship to loneliness in older adults, Aging ve Mental Health, 20 (10), ss. 1084-1091, DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2015.1060947
• Pieri, M., Diamantinir, D. (2010). Young people, elderly and ICT, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, ss. 2422– 2426.
• Prezza, M., Pacilli, M. G., Dinelli, S. (2004). Loneliness and new technologies in a group of Roman adolescents, Computers in Human Behavior, 20, ss. 691–709.
• Rabbie, J. M. (1982). The effects of intergroup competition and cooperation on intragroup and intergroup relationships. V. J. Derlega & J. Grzelak (Eds.), Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research içinde (ss. 123-149). New York: Academic Press.
• Reis, L. S., Reis, G., Barroso, J., Pereira, A. (2012). AMIGA -An interactive musical environment for Gerontechnology, Procedia Computer Science, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Software Development for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI 2012), 14, ss. 208 –217.
• Ryan, E. B., Kwong See:, Meneer, W. B., ve Trovato, D. (1992). Age-based perceptions of language performance among young and older adults. Communication Research, 19, ss. 423–443.
• Ryan: E., Campbell, K. A., Rigby, P. J. (2007) Reliability of the family impact of assistive technology scale for families of young children with cerebral palsy, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88 (11), ss. 1436-1440.
• Schmitt, E., Hinner, J., Kruse, A. (2015). Potentials of survivors, intergenerational dialogue, active ageing and social change, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, ss. 7 –16.
• Schneider, D. J.(1976).Social Psychology, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
• Schnittger, R. I. B., Wherton, J., Prendergast, D., Lawlor, B. A. (2012) Risk factors and mediating pathways of loneliness and social support in community-dwelling older adults, Aging ve Mental Health, 16(3), ss. 335-346, DOI:10.1080/13607863.2011.629092.
• Shepard, J. M. (2009). Sociology, Cengage Learning.
• Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation, Houghton -Mifflin, Boston.
• Szydlik, M. (2008). Intergenerational Solidarity and Conflict, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39 (1), Intergenerational Relations: Evidence from East and West, ss. 97-114.
• Susanto, T. D., Aljoza, M. (2015). Individual Acceptance of e-Government Services in a Developing Country: Dimensions of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use and the Importance of Trust and Social Influence, Procedia Computer Science, 72, ss. 622 –629.
• Şahin, Ç (2005). Aktif Öğretim Yöntemlerinden Beyin Fırtınası Yöntemi Ve Uygulaması, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (1), ss. 441-450.
• Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1985) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel ve W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.). Nelson-Hall, Chicago, ss. 7-24.
• Tajfel, H. (1978) The achievement of group differentiation. H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, Academic Press, London, ss. 77-98.
• Tajfler, H. (1978): Differentiation between social groups, Academic Press, London.
• Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence, Open University Press.United Nations (2013). World Population Ageing 2013, Erişim: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2013.pdf (15.06.2016).
• United Nations (2015).World Population Prospects The 2015 Revision: Key Findings and Advance Tables: 1, Erişim: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf(14.06.2016).
• Vernon, A. E. (1999). Designing for Change, Child ve Youth Services, 20 (1-2), ss. 161-173, DOI: 10.1300/J024v20n01_12.