Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 49 - 62, 05.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1315869

Abstract

References

  • Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the development of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and understanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593.
  • Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2021). A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795092
  • Aypay, A., & Ertem, H. Y. (2022). A bibliometric review of research on student outcomes in higher education 1960-2020. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 10(1), 27.
  • Booth, S., & Woollacott, L. C. (2018). On the constitution of SoTL: Its domains and contexts. Higher Education, 75, 537.
  • Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the scholarship of teaching and learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1.
  • Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey Bass.
  • Braxton, J. M., Francis, C. H., Kramer, J. W., & Marsicano, C. R. (2018). Inventorying the scholarship of teaching and learning literature. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 33; pp. 81-125). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_3
  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Carnegie Foundation.
  • Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.0377.
  • Chick, N., Nowell, L., & Lenart, B. (2019). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A scoping review protocol. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 186.
  • Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 75.
  • Dewar, J. Q., Bennet, C. D., & Fisher, M. A. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and Learning: A guide for scientists, engineers, and mathematicians. Oxford University Press.
  • Divan, A., Ludwig, L. O., Matthews, K. E., Motley, P. M., & Tomljenovic-Berube, A. M. (2017). Survey of research approaches utilised in the scholarship of teaching and learning publications. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 16.
  • Ertem, H. Y., & Aypay, A. (2021). Bibliometric review of studies on organizational and administrative dynamics in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(3), 77.
  • Ertem, H. Y., & Aypay, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on the first-year experiences of university students. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 13(1), 107.
  • Esen, M., Bellibas, M. S., & Gumus, S. (2020). The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 259.
  • Fanghanel, J., Pritchard, J., Potter, J., & Wisker, G. (2015). Defining and supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A sector-wide study (Literature review).
  • Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330.
  • Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
  • Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401.
  • How, Z. J. (2020). A systematic review of scholarship of teaching and learning research in higher education institutes from 2014–2019. In S. C. Tan & S.-H. A. Chen (Eds.), Transforming Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Chronicle of Research and Development in a Singaporean Context (pp. 11-43). Springer.
  • Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., Ciccione, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. Jossey-Bass.
  • Khodabandelou, R., Al Saddi, K., Hussein, R. M. R., Mohammed, W. F. W., Osman, M. E., & Al-Aghbari, M. (2022). Research trends in scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: A combination of thematic and bibliometric analysis. Resmilitaris, 12(6), 1430.
  • Kwiek, M. (2021). The prestige economy of higher education journals: A quantitative approach. Higher Education, 81(3), 493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y
  • Leibowitz, B., & Bozalek, V. (2020). The scholarship of teaching and learning from a social justice perspective. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Social Justice and Education (pp. 57-70). Routledge.
  • McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Anker Publishing.
  • Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.536972
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., ... & Clark, J. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889.
  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213.
  • Perry, R. P., & Smart, J. C (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Springer.
  • Phuong, T. T., Foster, M. J., & Reio Jr, T. G. (2020). Faculty development: A systematic review of review studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 32(4), 17.
  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307.
  • Sudakova, N. E., Savina, T. N., Masalimova, A. R., Mikhaylovsky, M. N., Karandeeva, L. G., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). Online formative assessment in higher education: Bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3), 209.
  • Tight, M. (2018). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61.
  • Vithal, R. (2018). Growing a scholarship of teaching and learning institutionally. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 468.
  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327.
  • Zhang, L., Carter Jr, R. A., Qian, X., Yang, S., Rujimora, J., & Wen, S. (2022). Academia’s responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 620.

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Year 2023, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 49 - 62, 05.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1315869

Abstract

The scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) forms a significant base for higher education. SoTL has the potential to lead higher education institutions in terms of teaching, research, and service. The purpose of the current study is to perform a bibliometric analysis of the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education. A bibliometric review was conducted in both Scopus and Web of Science databases, including 1491 and 1002 studies published in the sources indexed, respectively, in Scopus and Web of Science from the past to 2020. PRISMA was used to identify and select the documents in the sample. The data were analyzed using Scopus Analytic Tools, Excel functions, and VOSviewer. A considerable upward trend was observed in the number of documents from the past until 2020. “ASEE Annual Conference” was found to be the most influential source in Scopus, while “Teaching Sociology” was found to be the most influential source in Web of Science. Kreber, C., Healey, M., and Marquis, E. were the authors most drawing attention to both Scopus and the Web of Science. The intellectual structure of the knowledge base was based mainly on student voice, scholarship or teaching, and learning tips for both databases. Temporal analyses showed that the topical foci of SoTL were identity and critical pedagogy for Scopus and leadership and sustainability for Web of Science.

References

  • Antonio, A. L. (2001). The role of interracial interaction in the development of leadership skills and cultural knowledge and understanding. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 593.
  • Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2021). A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795092
  • Aypay, A., & Ertem, H. Y. (2022). A bibliometric review of research on student outcomes in higher education 1960-2020. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 10(1), 27.
  • Booth, S., & Woollacott, L. C. (2018). On the constitution of SoTL: Its domains and contexts. Higher Education, 75, 537.
  • Boshier, R. (2009). Why is the scholarship of teaching and learning such a hard sell? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 1.
  • Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer’s four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. Jossey Bass.
  • Braxton, J. M., Francis, C. H., Kramer, J. W., & Marsicano, C. R. (2018). Inventorying the scholarship of teaching and learning literature. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (vol. 33; pp. 81-125). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72490-4_3
  • Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Carnegie Foundation.
  • Chadegani, A. A., Salehi, H., Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.0377.
  • Chick, N., Nowell, L., & Lenart, B. (2019). The scholarship of teaching and learning: A scoping review protocol. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 7(2), 186.
  • Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 75.
  • Dewar, J. Q., Bennet, C. D., & Fisher, M. A. (2018). The scholarship of teaching and Learning: A guide for scientists, engineers, and mathematicians. Oxford University Press.
  • Divan, A., Ludwig, L. O., Matthews, K. E., Motley, P. M., & Tomljenovic-Berube, A. M. (2017). Survey of research approaches utilised in the scholarship of teaching and learning publications. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(2), 16.
  • Ertem, H. Y., & Aypay, A. (2021). Bibliometric review of studies on organizational and administrative dynamics in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 2(3), 77.
  • Ertem, H. Y., & Aypay, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on the first-year experiences of university students. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 13(1), 107.
  • Esen, M., Bellibas, M. S., & Gumus, S. (2020). The evolution of leadership research in higher education for two decades (1995-2014): A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 259.
  • Fanghanel, J., Pritchard, J., Potter, J., & Wisker, G. (2015). Defining and supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A sector-wide study (Literature review).
  • Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330.
  • Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
  • Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401.
  • How, Z. J. (2020). A systematic review of scholarship of teaching and learning research in higher education institutes from 2014–2019. In S. C. Tan & S.-H. A. Chen (Eds.), Transforming Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Chronicle of Research and Development in a Singaporean Context (pp. 11-43). Springer.
  • Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., Ciccione, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. Jossey-Bass.
  • Khodabandelou, R., Al Saddi, K., Hussein, R. M. R., Mohammed, W. F. W., Osman, M. E., & Al-Aghbari, M. (2022). Research trends in scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: A combination of thematic and bibliometric analysis. Resmilitaris, 12(6), 1430.
  • Kwiek, M. (2021). The prestige economy of higher education journals: A quantitative approach. Higher Education, 81(3), 493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00553-y
  • Leibowitz, B., & Bozalek, V. (2020). The scholarship of teaching and learning from a social justice perspective. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Social Justice and Education (pp. 57-70). Routledge.
  • McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Anker Publishing.
  • Mårtensson, K., Roxå, T., & Olsson, T. (2011). Developing a quality culture through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.536972
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., ... & Clark, J. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition). Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine, 7(9), 889.
  • Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213.
  • Perry, R. P., & Smart, J. C (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Springer.
  • Phuong, T. T., Foster, M. J., & Reio Jr, T. G. (2020). Faculty development: A systematic review of review studies. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 32(4), 17.
  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307.
  • Sudakova, N. E., Savina, T. N., Masalimova, A. R., Mikhaylovsky, M. N., Karandeeva, L. G., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2022). Online formative assessment in higher education: Bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3), 209.
  • Tight, M. (2018). Tracking the scholarship of teaching and learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61.
  • Vithal, R. (2018). Growing a scholarship of teaching and learning institutionally. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 468.
  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co‐citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327.
  • Zhang, L., Carter Jr, R. A., Qian, X., Yang, S., Rujimora, J., & Wen, S. (2022). Academia’s responses to crisis: A bibliometric analysis of literature on online learning in higher education during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 620.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hasan Yücel ERTEM 0000-0001-9058-641X

Ahmet AYPAY 0000-0003-0568-8409

Publication Date July 5, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Cite

APA ERTEM, H. Y., & AYPAY, A. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 4(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1315869