THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL GENDER PERCEPTIONS AND FEMALE EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT

Year 2018, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 2137 - 2151, 31.12.2018

Serdar Yener Özgür Demirtaş

https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.402571

Abstract

            Social
gender perception based on the gender perceptions which determine duty,
responsibility and expectations of individuals in a society. Social gender
perceptions is defined as a reference which is used by women while fullfilling
their  resposibilities in their  different areas of life. Work  is accepted as major part of  female’s life in which effect of social
gender perception is sensed. When considered that emplyee’s commitment affects
the performance of organizations female employee’s commitment might  associate with social gender perceptions.
Female employees working in government and private sectors of Sinop and its
districts  are consisting the sample
group of the research. The researcy  frame  is based on spillover theory. Data gathered
from sample was analyzed with an statistical programme. According to the
regression test  results effect of social
gender perception on employee commitment was observed.

Keywords

Woman Employees, Work Engagement, Social Gender Perceiveness

KADIN ÇALIŞANLARIN TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ALGILARI VE İŞE ADANMIŞLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Abstract

Toplumsal
cinsiyet algısı bireylerin toplumdaki görev, sorumluluk ve kendilerinden olan
beklentileri belirleyen cinsiyet 
normlarına dayanır. Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı kadınların yaşamın farklı
alanlarındaki sorumluluklarını yerine getirmede kullandıkları referans olarak
tanımlanmaktadır. İş yaşamı toplumsal cinsiyet algısının etkin olarak
hissedildiği bir alan olarak kadınların yaşamında bir yer  kapsamaktadır. Çalışanların adanmışlıklarının
işletmenin performansını etkilediği gözönüne alındığında işgücünün büyük bir
kısmını oluşturan kadın çalışanların adanmışlarının toplumsal cinsiyet algısı
tarafından etkilenebileceği düşünülmüştür. Yayılım kuramı (Spillover Theory)
çerçevesinde kurulan modelin araştırılması için 
Sinop il ve ilçelerinde  kamu ve
özel sektörde ücretli çalışan kadınlardan oluşan örneklem kullanılmıştır.
Örneklemden toplanan veriler bir istatistik programı ile analiz edilmiştir.
Regresyon sonuçlarına göre toplumsal cinsiyet algısının adanmışlığı etkilediği
görülmüştür. 

Keywords

Kadın Çalışanlar, İşe Adanmışlık, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısı

References

• Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31-53.Barnes, D., & E. Collier, J. (2013). Investigating work engagement in the service environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(6), 485-499.Bicchieri, C. (2014). Norms, conventions, and the power of expectations. Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, 208-229.Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. (2010). Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(2), 161-178. Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., & Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(3), 262-270.Cogin, J. A., & Fish, A. (2009). An empirical investigation of sexual harassment and work engagement: Surprising differences between men and women. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(1), 47-61.Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). About the dark and bright sides of self-efficacy: Workaholism and work engagement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 688-701.Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Gallup (2012). Gallup Engagement Index. (http://eu.gallup.com/berlin /118645/gallup-engagement-index.aspx, 13.04.2017 tarihinde erişildi).Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.) (1998) Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling, by Arlie Russell Hochschild. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.Karatepe, O.M. (2012). Job resources,work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time-lagged analysis, Economic Research, 25, 1127-1140.Mendes, F. & Stander, M.W. (2011). Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37 (1), 1-13.Rees, C., Alfes, K. & Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2780-2798.Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. (Eds), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Rothbard, N.P. (2001). Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-84.Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W.B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.Wong,C.A.,Laschinger, S. & Cummings, G. G. (2010). Authentic Leadership and Nurses' Voice Behaviour and Perceptions of Care Quality, Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 889-900.