Responses to Drought Stress Levels of Strawberry Grown in Greenhouse Conditions

Year 2020, Volume: 37 Issue: 2, 113 - 122, 01.12.2020

Berkant Ödemiş Derya Kazgöz Candemir Fatih Evrendilek

https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.805196

Cited By: 3

Abstract

This experimental study was carried out using the 'Camarosa' variety strawberry plants grown in pots in greenhouse conditions. One control and two drought levels were created by bringing the existing soil water content of the pot to the field capacity (I100-control) and using its 66% (I66-mild drought stress) and 33% (I33-severe drought stress) in irrigation. The experimental design of the randomized complete blocks design was applied in four replicates with 10 pots per replicate amounting to a total of 120 pots. In order to determine the plant response to the generated stress levels, stomatal conductivity (Sc, mmol m2 s-1), total chlorophyll content (SPAD, μmol m-2 s-1), chlorophyll concentration (CC, mg g-1), leaf surface temperature (LST, °C), photosynthetic quantum yield (Qy, %), photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, W s-1), leaf water content (LWC-%), yield (g pot-1), leaf area (LA), leaf number (LN), and crop water use were measured in three plants per each replicate. 1.89, 3.62, and 5.82 L pot-1 were applied to I33, I66, and I100 as irrigation water, while 2.59, 3.92, and 5.59 L pot-1 were crop water used from them, respectively. Average strawberry yield varied between 80 and 400 g pot-1. The increased drought stress decreased Sc, SPAD, CC, Qy, PAR, LWC, LA, and LN but increased LST. All the measured variables had significant relationships with irrigation water and crop water use. Yield had a linear relationship with LST and LN and a polynomial relationship with Sc, SPAD, CC, Qy, PAR, LWC, and LA. Water and light use efficiencies were quantified and predicted through the best-fit (non-) linear models.

Keywords

Drought stress, Greenhouse, Strawberry, Vegetative parameters, Physiological parameters

References

• Arnon, D.I. (1949). Cooper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polypenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris plant physiology, 24:1-5.
• Bacelar, E., Santos, D., Moutinhopereira, J., Goncalves, B., Ferreira, H., & Correia, C. (2006). Immediate responses and adaptative strategies of three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes: Changes on structure and chemical composition of foliage and oxidative damage. Plant Science, 170:596-605.
• Bek, Y., & Efe, E. (1988). Araştırma ve Deneme Medotları I. Ç.Ü.Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Kitabı: No:71, 395 s (in Turkish).
• Blanke, M.M., & Cooke, D.T. (2004). Effect of flooding and drought on stomatal activity, transpiration, photosynthesis, water potential and water channel activity in strawberry stolons and leaves. Plant Gowth Regulations, 42:153-160.
• Chaves, M.M., Maroco, J.P., & Pereira, J.S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30:239–264.
• Chen, Y.H., Yu, S.L., & Yu, Z.W. (2003): Relationship between amount or distribution of PAR interception and grain output of wheat communities. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 29:730–734.
• El-Farhan, A.H., & Pritts, M.P. (1997). Water requirements and water stress in strawberry. Advance in Strawberry Research, 16:5-12.
• Flexas, J., Bota, J., Cifre, J., Escalona, M.J., Galmes, J., Gulias, J., Lefi, E.K., Martinez-Canellas, S.F., Moreno, M.T., Ribas-Carbo, M., Riera, D., Sampol, B., & Medrano, H. (2004). Understanding down-regulation of photosynthesis under water stress: future prospects and searching for physiology tools for irrigation management. Annals of Applied Biology, 144:273-283.
• Jackson, P., Rubertson, M., Cupper, M., & Hammer, G. (1996). The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding from breeding perspective. Field Crops Research, 49:11–37.
• Jones, H.G. (1999). Use of thermography for quantitative studies of spatial and temporal variation of stomatal conductance over leaf surfaces. Plant Cell Environment, 22:1043–1055.
• Ghaderi, N., & Siosemardeh, A. (2011). Response to drought stress of two strawberry cultivars (cv. Kurdistan and Selva). Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 52:6–12.
• Giovanardi, R., & Testolin, R. (1984) Evapotranspiration et response productive du fraisier (Fragaria x ananassa Dutch.) en fonction du regime hydrique du sol. In: Perrier A, Riou C (eds) Les besoins en eau des cultures. INRA, Versailles, p.305.
• Grant, O.M., Johnson, A.W., Davies, M.J., James, C.M., & Simpson, D.W. (2010). Physiological and morphological diversity cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananasa) in response to water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 68:264-272.
• Islam, H., Haq, E., Paul, P.P., Paul, A., & Hoque, Z. (2016). Water requirement analysis of three strawberry cultivars by using bucket-type lysimeter and its comparative study. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 2:672-677.
• Hanson, B., & Bendixen, W. (2004). Drip irrigation evaluated in Santa Maria Valley strawberries. California Agriculture, 58:48–53.
• Kerepesi, I., & Galiba, G. (2000). Osmotic and salt stress-induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Science, 40:482–487.
• Klamkowski, K., & Treder, W. (2008). Response to drought stress of three strawberry cultivars grown under greenhouse conditions. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 16:79-188.
• Lawlor, D.W., & Cornic, G. (2002). Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25:275-294.
• Li, Q.Q., Chen, Y.H., Liu, M.Y., Zhou, X.B., Yu, S.L., & Dong B.D. (2008): Effects of irrigation and planting patterns on radiation use efficiency and yield of winter wheat in North China. Agricultural Water Management, 95:469–476.
• Lichtenhaler, H.K., & Welburn, A.R. (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a, b, and extract in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 11:591-592.
• Long, S.P., Postl, W.F., & Bolhár Nordenkampf, H.R. (1993) Quantum yields for uptake of carbon dioxide in C3 vascular plants of contrasting habitats and taxonomic groupings. Planta, 189:226–234.
• Lozano, D., Ruiz, N., & Gavilán, P. (2016). Consumptive water use and irrigation performance of strawberries. Agricultural Water Management, 169:44-51.
• Mansfield, T., & Davies, W. (1981). Stomata and stomatal mechanisms. in: Paleg Lg, Aspinall D (Eds) The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, New York, p: 315–346.
• Mittler, R., Merquiol, E., Hallak-Herr, E., Rachmilevitch, S., Kaplan, A., & Cohen, M. (2001). Living under ‘dormant’ canopy: a molecular acclimation mechanism of desert plant Retama raetam. Plant Journal, 25:407-416.
• Ödemiş, B., Akışcan, Y., Akgöl, B., & Can, D. (2017). Kısıtlı su koşullarında yapraktan uygulanan kükürt dozlarının pamuk bitkisinin kuraklık toleransına etkileri. TUBITAK, Proje No: 214O254 (in Turkish).
• Önal, K. (1991). Meristem kültürü yöntemi ile üretmenin bazı çilek çeşitlerinin vegatatif ve generatif özelliklerine etkileri üzerinde araştırmalar. PhD Thesis, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey (in Turkish).
• Passioura, J., Condon, A., & Richards, R. (1993). Water deficits, the development of leaf area and crop productivity. In Smith Jac, Griffiths H (Eds) Water Deficits. Plant Responses from Cell to Community. Bıos Scientific Publishers, Oxford, 253–264.
• Plenet, D., Mollier, A., & Pellerin, S. (2000): Growth analysis of maize field crops under phosphorus deficiency. II. Radiation-use efficiency, biomass accumulation and yield components. Plant Soil, 224:259–272.
• Richards, R.A. (2006). Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agricultural Water Management, 80:197–211.
• Serrano, L., Xavier, C., Robert, S., Oriol, M., & Josep, P. (1992). Effects of irrigation regimes on the yield and water use of strawberry. Irrigation Science, 13:45-48.
• Sircelj, H., Tausz, M., Gill, D., & Batic, F. (2007). Detecting different levels of drought stress in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) with selected biochemical and physiological parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, 113:362-369.
• Slafer, G.A., Araus, J.L., Royo, C., & Del Moral, L.F.G. (2005). Promising ecophysiological traits for genetic improvement of cereal yields in mediterranean environments. Annals of Applied Biology, 146:61–70.
• Strand, L.L. (2008). Integrated pest management for strawberries (Vol. 3351), UCANR Publications, California, USA.
• Treder, W., Klamkowski, K., Krzewińska, D., & Tryngiel-Gać, A. (2009). The latest trends in irrigation technology – Research related to irrigation of fruit crops conducted at the Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture in Skierniewice. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich, 6:95–107.
• Trout, T.J., & Gartung, J. (2004). Irrigation water requirements of strawberries. Proceedings of California Plant and Soil Conference, California, USA. Ed.by: California Chapter of the American Society of Agronomy, pp. 54-59.
• Walter, A., & Shurr, U. (2005). Dynamics of leaf and root growth: endogenous control versus environmental impact. Annals of Botany, 95:891–900.
• Whitfield, D.M., & Smith, C.J. (1989): Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, light interception and efficiency of light conversion in wheat. Field Crops Research, 20:279–295.