BibTex RIS Cite

Sayfa Uzunluğu Farklı Hiperortamların Öğrenme Performansı ve Memnuniyete Etkisi

Year 2009, Volume: 36 Issue: 36, - , 01.06.2009

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, öğrenme amaçlı hiperortamlaıın sayfa uzunluğunun, üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme performanslarına (başan, çalışma ve test süresi) ve ortamla ilgili memnuniyete etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırma YTÜ Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 127 lisans öğrencisi üzerinde ve deneysel işlemde kullanılmak üzere sayfaları uzun ve kısa olmak üzere araştırmacılarca geliştirilmiş iki farklı hiperortarnda gerçekleştirilmiştir. I-Iiperortamda sunulan Beyne Dayalı Öğrenme konulu içerik, çoktan seçmeli başan testi ve hiperortamla ilgili görüş anketi araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilmiştir. İstatistik analizler için bağımsız grup t-testi ve Mann-Whitney-U testi kullamlrmştır. Bulgular, sayfa uzunluğunun öğrencilerin öğrenme performanslarım ve hiperortamla ilgili görüşlerini etkilemediğini göstermiştir. Bu bulgu, bilgisayar-destekli ve Web-tabanh öğretim materyallerinde alışılmış bir uygulama olan, sayfaları kısa tasarlama yaklaşımının üniversite öğrencileri için bir gereklilik olmadığım göstermiştir

References

  • Alessi, S. M. ve Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences: Irnplications for web-based learning design. International Education Journal, 4 (3). 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://ehlt.flinders.edu.auleducation/iejlarticles/v4n4/alomyan2/paper.pdf adresinden alınnuştır.
  • Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (4), 500-525 .
  • Baker, J. R. (2003). The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News, 5.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http:l/psychology.wichita.edulsurl/usabilitynews/Sllpaging_scrolling.htrn adresinden almmıştır.
  • F.EYÜBOĞLU—F. ORHAN /I-I. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal ofEducation), 36 (2009), 97-108
  • Bernard, M., Baker, R. ve Fernandez, M. (2002). Paging vs. scrolling: looking for the best way to present search results. Usability News, 4.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/paging.htrn adresinden ahnmıştır.
  • Boles, W., Pillay, H. ve Raj, L. (1999). Matching cognitive styles to computer-based instruction: an approach for enhancing learning in electrical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 24 (4), 371-83.
  • Calcaterra, A. ve Alessandro, J. U. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44 (4), 441-457.
  • Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 449—460.
  • Chou, C. (1999). Developing hypertext-based learning courseware for computer networks: the macro and nıicro stages. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (l).
  • Dillon, A. ve Zhu, E. (1997). Designing Web-Based Instruction: A human-computer interaction perspective. (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.221-224). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Diinser, A. ve Jirasko, M. (2005). Interaction of hypertext forms and global versus sequential learning styles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (1), 79-91.
  • Dyson, M. C. ve Kipping, G. J. (1998). The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32 (2), 150—180.
  • Dywer, F. M. ve Moore, D. M. (2001). The effect of gender, field dependence and color-coding on student achievement of different educational objectives. International Journal of Instructional Media New York, 28 (3), 309-318.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (4), 281-311.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52 (1), 5-22.
  • Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A. Ellis, D. ve Spink, A. (2002). information seeking and mediated searching. part 4. cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9).
  • Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 407—418.
  • Graff, M. (2005). differences in concept mapping, hypertext architecture, and the analyst-intuition dimension of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 25 (4), 409-422.
  • Hsu, T. E. (1994). effects of learner cognitive styles and metacognitive tools on mformation acquisition paths and learning ın hyperspace environments. National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Kongresi, 1994. 16. 20.02.1994 tarihinde http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortaJ/recordDetail?accno=ED37372l adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Kılıç, E. ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Cinsiyet ve öğrenme tarzının dolaşma stratejisi ve başarıya etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 129-146.
  • Kim, K. (1998 ). Information seeking behavior on the world wide web: Effects of cognitive style, online database search experience and task types on search performance. The University of Texas, Austin, yaylmlanmamls doktora tezi.
  • Kim, K. (2001). Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Ineraction, 13(3), 323-340.
  • Kim, K ve Allen, B. (2002). Cognitive and task inşuences on web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53 (2), 109-119.
  • Lee, M. J. ve Harvey, F. A. (1999). the relationship between navigational patterns and ınformation processing styles of hypermedia users. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1), 235-261.
  • Leong, S. C. ve Al-Hawamdesh, S. (1999). Gender and learning attitudes in using web-based science lessons. Information Research, 5 ( 1). 12.11.2005 tarihinde www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications/infres/paper66.html adresinden ahnrmştır.
  • Liu, M. W. ve Reed, M. (1994, Şubat). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles ın a hypemtedia environment. Annual Conference of Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Nasville.
  • Liu, M, ve Bera, S. (2005). an analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Developmen, 53 (1), 5-21.
  • Mills, C. B. ve Weldon, L. J. (1986). Reading text from computer secreens. ACM Computing Surveys, 19, 329-358.
  • Mitchell, T. F., Chen, S. ve Macredie, R. D. (2005). Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs system expertise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (1), 53-64.
  • Nielsen, J. (1997). Changes in web usability since 1994. 16.03.2006 tarihinde http://Www.useit.comla1ertboxl9712a.html adresinden ahnmıştır.
  • Newby, T. J ., Stepich, D., Lehman, J. ve Russell, J. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning. desiging instruction, 1ntegrating computers, and using media. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Palmquist, R. A. ve Kim, K. (2000). Cognitive style and online database search experience as predictors of web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 6, 558-566.
  • Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y. veThunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 565-589
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity? (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.25-40). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Sabry, K. ve Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technolog, 34 (4), 443-454.
  • Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. P., ve Pastoor, S. (1983). A Comparison of Paging and Scrolling For Changing Screen Contents By Inexperienced Users. Human Factor, 24, 279-282.
  • Shannon, R. The history of the net. 17.03.2006 tarihinde http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/starthere/historyofthenet.html adresinden ahnmıştır.
Year 2009, Volume: 36 Issue: 36, - , 01.06.2009

Abstract

References

  • Alessi, S. M. ve Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences: Irnplications for web-based learning design. International Education Journal, 4 (3). 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://ehlt.flinders.edu.auleducation/iejlarticles/v4n4/alomyan2/paper.pdf adresinden alınnuştır.
  • Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (4), 500-525 .
  • Baker, J. R. (2003). The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News, 5.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http:l/psychology.wichita.edulsurl/usabilitynews/Sllpaging_scrolling.htrn adresinden almmıştır.
  • F.EYÜBOĞLU—F. ORHAN /I-I. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal ofEducation), 36 (2009), 97-108
  • Bernard, M., Baker, R. ve Fernandez, M. (2002). Paging vs. scrolling: looking for the best way to present search results. Usability News, 4.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/paging.htrn adresinden ahnmıştır.
  • Boles, W., Pillay, H. ve Raj, L. (1999). Matching cognitive styles to computer-based instruction: an approach for enhancing learning in electrical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 24 (4), 371-83.
  • Calcaterra, A. ve Alessandro, J. U. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44 (4), 441-457.
  • Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 449—460.
  • Chou, C. (1999). Developing hypertext-based learning courseware for computer networks: the macro and nıicro stages. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (l).
  • Dillon, A. ve Zhu, E. (1997). Designing Web-Based Instruction: A human-computer interaction perspective. (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.221-224). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Diinser, A. ve Jirasko, M. (2005). Interaction of hypertext forms and global versus sequential learning styles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (1), 79-91.
  • Dyson, M. C. ve Kipping, G. J. (1998). The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32 (2), 150—180.
  • Dywer, F. M. ve Moore, D. M. (2001). The effect of gender, field dependence and color-coding on student achievement of different educational objectives. International Journal of Instructional Media New York, 28 (3), 309-318.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (4), 281-311.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52 (1), 5-22.
  • Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A. Ellis, D. ve Spink, A. (2002). information seeking and mediated searching. part 4. cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9).
  • Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 407—418.
  • Graff, M. (2005). differences in concept mapping, hypertext architecture, and the analyst-intuition dimension of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 25 (4), 409-422.
  • Hsu, T. E. (1994). effects of learner cognitive styles and metacognitive tools on mformation acquisition paths and learning ın hyperspace environments. National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Kongresi, 1994. 16. 20.02.1994 tarihinde http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortaJ/recordDetail?accno=ED37372l adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Kılıç, E. ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Cinsiyet ve öğrenme tarzının dolaşma stratejisi ve başarıya etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 129-146.
  • Kim, K. (1998 ). Information seeking behavior on the world wide web: Effects of cognitive style, online database search experience and task types on search performance. The University of Texas, Austin, yaylmlanmamls doktora tezi.
  • Kim, K. (2001). Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Ineraction, 13(3), 323-340.
  • Kim, K ve Allen, B. (2002). Cognitive and task inşuences on web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53 (2), 109-119.
  • Lee, M. J. ve Harvey, F. A. (1999). the relationship between navigational patterns and ınformation processing styles of hypermedia users. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1), 235-261.
  • Leong, S. C. ve Al-Hawamdesh, S. (1999). Gender and learning attitudes in using web-based science lessons. Information Research, 5 ( 1). 12.11.2005 tarihinde www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications/infres/paper66.html adresinden ahnrmştır.
  • Liu, M. W. ve Reed, M. (1994, Şubat). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles ın a hypemtedia environment. Annual Conference of Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Nasville.
  • Liu, M, ve Bera, S. (2005). an analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Developmen, 53 (1), 5-21.
  • Mills, C. B. ve Weldon, L. J. (1986). Reading text from computer secreens. ACM Computing Surveys, 19, 329-358.
  • Mitchell, T. F., Chen, S. ve Macredie, R. D. (2005). Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs system expertise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (1), 53-64.
  • Nielsen, J. (1997). Changes in web usability since 1994. 16.03.2006 tarihinde http://Www.useit.comla1ertboxl9712a.html adresinden ahnmıştır.
  • Newby, T. J ., Stepich, D., Lehman, J. ve Russell, J. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning. desiging instruction, 1ntegrating computers, and using media. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Palmquist, R. A. ve Kim, K. (2000). Cognitive style and online database search experience as predictors of web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 6, 558-566.
  • Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y. veThunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 565-589
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity? (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.25-40). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Sabry, K. ve Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technolog, 34 (4), 443-454.
  • Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. P., ve Pastoor, S. (1983). A Comparison of Paging and Scrolling For Changing Screen Contents By Inexperienced Users. Human Factor, 24, 279-282.
  • Shannon, R. The history of the net. 17.03.2006 tarihinde http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/starthere/historyofthenet.html adresinden ahnmıştır.
There are 38 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Filiz Eyüboğlu This is me

Feza Orhan This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 36 Issue: 36

Cite

APA Eyüboğlu, F., & Orhan, F. (2009). Sayfa Uzunluğu Farklı Hiperortamların Öğrenme Performansı ve Memnuniyete Etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(36).