COVID-19 Pandemisinde Öğretmenlerde Kas-İskelet Sistemi Rahatsızlıkları ile Uzaktan Eğitimle İlişkili Parametreler, Yaşam Kalitesi ve Kaygı Düzeyi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 151 - 165, 30.04.2022

Özden Özkal Arzu Demircioğlu

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Covid-19 pandemi döneminde öğretmenlerin kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları ile uzaktan eğitimle ilişkili parametreler, yaşam kalitesi ve kaygı düzeyi arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya toplam 157 öğretmen dahil edildi. Öğretmenlerin demografik bilgileri ve uzaktan eğitim ile ilişkili verileri kaydedildi. Öğretmenlerin kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları Cornell Kas İskelet Sistemi Rahatsızlıkları Anketi (CKİSRA) ile değerlendirildi. CKİSRA ile, bireylerin omurga, üst ekstremite, alt ekstremite ve toplam puanları ayrı ayrı hesaplandı. Katılımcıların yaşam kaliteleri Beş Boyutlu Avrupa Genel Yaşam Kalitesi Ölçeği ile değerlendirildi. Yaşam kalitesi puanı, indeks ve görsel analog skalası (GAS) puanları olarak ayrı ayrı hesaplandı.
Bulgular: Kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları (omurga) ile haftalık çevrim içi ders süresi (p<0,001), kaygı düzeyi (p=0,01), yaşam kalitesi [indeks puanı (p<0,001); GAS puanı (p<0,001)], mesleki çalışma yılı (p=0,004) ve yaş (p=0,022) arasında anlamlı ilişki bulundu. Kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları (üst ekstremite) ile kaygı düzeyi (p=0,03) ve yaşam kalitesi [indeks puanı (p<0,001); GAS puanı (p=0,016)] arasında anlamlı ilişki görüldü. Kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları (alt ekstremite) ile haftalık çevrim içi ders süresi (p=0,016), haftalık yüz yüze ders süresi (p=0,033) ve yaşam kalitesi [indeks puanı (p<0,001); GAS puanı (p=0,001)] arasında anlamlı ilişki saptandı. Kas iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıkları (toplam puan) ile haftalık çevrim içi ders süresi (p=0,001), haftalık yüz yüze ders süresi (p=0,01), kaygı düzeyi (p=0,002), yaşam kalitesi [indeks puanı (p<0,001); GAS puanı (p<0,001)], mesleki çalışma yılı (p=0,01) ve yaş ( p=0,038) arasında anlamlı ilişki görüldü.
Sonuç: Mevcut çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, COVID-19 pandemi döneminde, çevrim içi ders süreleri ile ilişkili olan kas iskelet sistemi problemlerinin önlenmesi için öğretmenlere koruyucu fizyoterapi yaklaşımları ile ilgili eğitimler verilmesi önerilir.

Keywords

COVID-19, kas-iskelet sistemi, ağrı, uzaktan eğitim, yaşam kalitesi

Supporting Institution

yok

Project Number

yok

Thanks

Yok

Investigation of the Relationship Between Musculoskeletal Disorders and Distance Education-Related Parameters, Quality of Life and Anxiety Level in Teachers in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between teachers' musculoskeletal disorders and parameters related to distance education, quality of life and anxiety level during the Covid-19 pandemic period.
Materials and Methods: A total of 157 teachers were included in the study. Demographic information of teachers and data related to distance education were recorded. Musculoskeletal disorders of teachers were evaluated with the Cornell Musculoskeletal Disorders Questionnaire (CMDQ). Spine, upper extremity, lower extremity and total scores of individuals were calculated separately with CMDQ. The participants' quality of life was evaluated with the The EuroQol-5 Dimension. Quality of life score index and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were calculated separately.
Results: A significant correlation was found between musculoskeletal disorders (spine) and weekly online lesson duration (p<0.001), anxiety level (p=0.01), quality of life [index score (p<0.001)); VAS score (p<0.001)], years of professional work (p=0.004), and age (p=0.022). There was a significant correlation between musculoskeletal disorders (upper extremity) and anxiety level (p=0.03) and quality of life [index score (p<0.001);VAS score (p=0.016)]. A significant correlation was found between musculoskeletal disorders (lower extremity) and weekly online lesson duration (p=0.016), weekly face-to-face lesson duration (p=0.033) and quality of life [index score (p<0.001); VAS score (p=0.001)]. There was a significant correlation between musculoskeletal disorders (total score) and weekly online lesson time (p=0.001), weekly face-to-face lesson duration (p=0.01), anxiety level (p=0.002), quality of life [index score (p<0.001); VAS score (p<0.001)], years of professional work (p=0.01), and age (p=0.038).
Conclusion: According to the results of the current study, it is recommended that teachers be given trainings on preventive physiotherapy approaches in order to prevent musculoskeletal problems associated with online course duration during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Keywords

COVID-19, musculoskeletal system, pain, distance education, quality of life

Project Number

yok

References

• Althomali, O. W., Amin, J., Alghamdi, W., & Shaik, D. H. (2021). Prevalence and Factors Associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders among Secondary Schoolteachers in Hail, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6632.
• Apaydın, U., Erol, E., Koçyiğit, M.F., & Elbasan, B. (2016). Öğretmenlerde bel ağrısı ile ilişkili faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 27(2), 42-47.
• Başkurt, F., Başkurt, Z., & Gelecek, N. (2011). Prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms in teachers. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi,2(2), 58-64.
• Cucinotta, D., & Vanelli, M. (2020). WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta biomed, 91(1),157-160.
• Daneshmandi, H., Choobineh, A. R., Ghaem, H., Alhamd, M., & Fakherpour, A. (2017). The effect of musculoskeletal problems on fatigue and productivity of office personnel: a cross-sectional study. Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 58(3), E252.
• Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., & Williams, A. (1996). The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Economics, 5(2), 141-54.
• Doyumgaç, I., Tanhan, A., & Kiymaz, M. S. (2021). Understanding the most important facilitators and barriers for online education during COVID-19 through online photovoice methodology. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 166-190.
• Erdinç, O., Hot, K., & Ozkaya, M. (2011). Turkish version of the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire: cross-culturaladaptation and validation. Work, 39(3), 251-260.
• Golightley, M., & Holloway, M. (2020). Social work in the time of the COVID19 pandemic: all in this together? British Journal of Social Work, 50(3),637-641.
• Hedge, A., Morimoto, S., & Mccrobie, D. (1999). Effects of keyboard tray geometry on upper body posture and comfort. Ergonomics, 42(10), 1333-1349.
• Heidarimoghadam, R., Saidnia, H., Joudaki, J., Mohammadi, Y., & Babamiri, M. (2019). Does mental workload can lead to musculoskeletal disorders in healthcare office workers? Suggest and investigate a path. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1664205.
• Hong, S., & Shin, D. (2020). Relationship between pain intensity, disability, exercise time and computer usage time and depression in office workers with non-specific chronic low back pain. Medical Hypotheses, 137, 109562.
• Kaya Aytutuldu, G., Birinci, T., & Tarakcı, E. (2020). Musculoskeletal pain and its relation to individual and work-related factors: a cross-sectional study among Turkish office workers who work using computers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1-8.
• Kayabınar, E., Kayabınar, B., Önal, B., Zengin, H. Y., & Köse, N. (2021). The musculoskeletal problems and psychosocial status of teachers giving online education during the COVID-19 pandemic and preventive telerehabilitation for musculoskeletal problems. Work, 68(1), 33-43.
• Keown, G.A., & Tuchin, P.A. (2018). Workplace factors associated with neck pain experienced by computer users: a systematic review. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 41(6), 508-529.
• Leirós-Rodríguez, R., Rodríguez-Nogueira, Ó., Pinto-Carral, A., Álvarez-Álvarez, M.J., Galán-Martín, M.Á., Montero-Cuadrado, F. ve diğerleri. (2020). Musculoskeletal Pain and Non-Classroom Teaching in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Impact on Students from Two Spanish Universities. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(12), 4053.
• Lippi, G., Henry, B.M., Bovo, C., & Sanchis-Gomar, F. (2020). Health risks and potential remedies during prolonged lockdowns for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Diagnosis,7(2), 85-90.
• Lizana, P.A., Vega-Fernadez, G., Gomez-Bruton, A., Leyton, B., & Lera, L. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Teacher Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Study from before and during the Health Crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7),3764.
• Ng, Y.M., Voo, P., & Maakip I. (2019). Psychosocial factors, depression, and musculoskeletal disorders among teachers. BMC public health, 19(1), 234.
• Özer, M. (2020). Educational policy actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID19 pandemic in Turkey. Kastamonu Educational Journal, 28(3), 1124-1129.
• Prieto-González, P., Šutvajová, M., Lesňáková, A., Bartík, P., Buľáková, K., & Friediger, T. (2021). Back Pain Prevalence, Intensity, and Associated Risk Factors among Female Teachers in Slovakia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel), 9(7), 860.
• Rabin, R., & de Charro F. (2001). EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Annals of Medicine, 33(5), 337-43.
• Safiri, S., Kolahi, A. A., Cross, M., Hill, C., Smith, E., Carson‐Chahhoud, K., ve diğerleri (2021). Prevalence, Deaths, and Disability‐Adjusted Life Years Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders for 195 Countries and Territories 1990–2017. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 73(4), 702-714.
• Sasikumar, V., & Binoosh S.C.A.B. (2020). A model for predicting the risk of musculoskeletal disorders among computer professionals. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(2), 384-96.
• Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
• Süt, H.K., & Ünsar, S. (2011). Is EQ-5D a valid quality of life instrument in patients with acute coronary syndrome? Anatolian Journal of Cardiology,11(2), 156-162.
• Şahin, R., Özkan, S., & İlhan, M.N. (2019). Akademisyenlerde İş Sağlığı ve İş Sağlığını Etkileyen Faktörler. Gazi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 11-18.
• Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Kurumu, 2015. Türkiye kas ve iskelet sistemi hastalıkları önleme ve kontrol programı (2015-2020) [Internet]. Erişim adresi: https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/Yayin/546.
• Vahdatpour, B., Bozorgi, M., & Taheri M.R. (2019). Investigating Musculoskeletal Discomforts and their Relation to Workplace Ergonomic Conditions among Computer Office Workers at Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran. Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation, and Electrodiagnosis,1(2),52-58.
• Williams, V. S., Morlock, R. J., & Feltner, D. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety. Health and quality of life outcomes, 8(1), 1-8.
• Xie, X., Siau, K., & Nah, F. F. H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 22(3), 175-187.