Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of the Laparoscopic Appendectomy Advantage and Disadvantages

Year 2018, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 31 - 35, 22.04.2018

Abstract

Aim: Acute apandicitis is a common cause of
emergency surgery in general surgery practise. In this study we aimed to share
our experience on laparascopic apendectomy, evaluate the reliability and
applicability of laparascopic apendectomy.

Materials and Methods: Data of patients
diagnosed as acute apandicitis and underwent laparascopic apendectomy were
obtained retrospectively from hospital records between March 2012 – October
2013. Sixty-five patients who were operated by the same team included in this
study. Patients demografic results, open apendectomy rates, operation times and
hospitalitation times were evaluated.

Results: Mean age of patients included in the study was
32.05 ± 11.25. Thirty patients (%46.15) were male and 35 patients (%53.85) were
female. Apendix was seen normal in three patient (%4.61) and apendectomy was
not performed. Perforation of appendix was seen in 8 patients (%12.3). In 5
patients operation was turned to open apendectomy (%7.69). Wound infection was
seen in three of four patients and intraabdominal locale liquid with air values
was seen in one of four patients. Mean operation time was 42.15 ± 17.8 minutes.







Conclusion: Laparascopic appendectomy is an prefered
method for treatment of acute apandicitis but if it is necessary, open
appendectomy has to be prefered and optimal treatment tecniques must be chosen
for the patient.

References

  • 1. Yıldız F, Çoban S, Terzi A,Kaya M, Soyalp M, Uzunköy A. Laparoskopik apendektomi ve açık apendektomi olgularımızın karşılaştırılması, Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi: 2009: 7 (2) :95 -100
  • 2. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 59-64
  • 3. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 334-337
  • 4. Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus Standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1174- 1180
  • 5. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 439-448
  • 6. Guercio G, Augello G, Licari L, Dafnomili A, Raspanti C, Bagarella N, Falco N, Rotolo G, Fontana T, Porello C, Gulotta G. Acute appendicitis: should the laparoscopic approach be proposed as the gold standard? Six-year experience in an Emergency Surgery Unit. G Chir. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):174-179
  • 7 Bozkurt MA, Unsal MG, Kapan S, Gonenc M, Dogan M, Kalayci MU, Alis H. Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):87-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0411-x. Epub 2014 May 31.
  • 8. Ateş O, Hakgüder G, Olguner M, Akgür FM. Tek Trokar İle Karın İçinde Laparoskopik Apendektomi: Yeni Bir Yöntem. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2006; 20 (1): 29 - 34
  • 9. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:799-804.
  • 10. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg. 1999; 23: 835-845.
  • 11. Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA. Acute appendicitis--a clear- cut case in men, a guessing game in young women A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 923-927
  • 12. Tümay LF, Güner OS, Zorluoğlu A. Laparoskopik Apendektomi Deneyimimiz 132 Olgu. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2010;20:115-120
  • 13. Turhan AN, Kapan S, Kütükçü E, Yiğitbaş H, Aygün E. Akut Apandisitte Nonoperatif Takip ve Tedavi. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2006;2:134-136
  • 14. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186(5):545-5534
  • 15. Sotelo-Anaya E, Sánchez-Muñoz P, Ploneda Valencia CF, de la Cerda Trujillo LF, Varela-Muñoz O, Gutiérrez-Chávez C, López-Lizarriga CR. Acute appendicitis in an overweight and obese Mexican population: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2012;32:6–9
  • 16. Horvath P, Lange J, Bachmann R, Struller F, Königsrainer A, Zdichavsky M. Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z
  • 17. Kanat BH, Türkoğlu A, Yur M, Girgin M, Aslanmirza MY. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. HealthMED 2013;7 (4) : 1220

Laparoskopik Appendektominin Avantaj ve Dezavantajlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 31 - 35, 22.04.2018

Abstract

Amaç: Akut apandisit genel cerrahide en sık
rastlanan acil ameliyat nedenlerinden biridir. Bu makalede; laparoskopik
apendektomi deneyimimizi paylaşmayı, güvenirliğini ve uygulanabilirliğini
değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.



Materyal ve Metod: Mart 2012-Aralık 2013
tarihleri arasında akut apandisit tanı / ön tanısı ile laparoskopik apendektomi
yapılan olguların verileri hastane kayıtlarından elde edilerek  retrospektif olarak incelendi. Çalışmaya aynı
ekip tarafından ameliyat edilen 65 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik
özellikleri, açığa dönüş oranları, operasyon süreleri ve hastanede kalış
süreleri incelendi.



Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 65 hastanın yaş
ortalaması 32.05 ± 11.25 olup, hastaların 30’u (%46.15) erkek, 35’i (%53.85)
kadın idi. Hastalardan üçünde (%4.61) apendiks normaldi ve apendektomileri
yapılmadı. Sekiz hastada (% 12.3) apendiks perforasyonu saptandı. Toplam 5 (%
7.69) hastada açık ameliyata geçildi. Komplikasyon gelişen toplam 4 (%6,1)
hastanın üçünde yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve bir hastada ise loküle ve içerisinde
hava değerleri olan safra kesesi lojunda sıvı olduğu görüldü. Ortalama ameliyat
süresi 42.15 ± 17.8 dakika idi.



Sonuç: Akut apandisit tedavisinde; laparoskopik
apendektomi tercih edilebilecek bir yöntemdir ancak gerekli durumlarda açık
ameliyata geçilmeli ve hasta için en uygun tedavi yöntemi seçilmelidir.

References

  • 1. Yıldız F, Çoban S, Terzi A,Kaya M, Soyalp M, Uzunköy A. Laparoskopik apendektomi ve açık apendektomi olgularımızın karşılaştırılması, Tıp Araştırmaları Dergisi: 2009: 7 (2) :95 -100
  • 2. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983; 15: 59-64
  • 3. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 334-337
  • 4. Bresciani C, Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, et al. Laparoscopic versus Standard appendectomy outcomes and cost comparisons in the private sector. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 1174- 1180
  • 5. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 439-448
  • 6. Guercio G, Augello G, Licari L, Dafnomili A, Raspanti C, Bagarella N, Falco N, Rotolo G, Fontana T, Porello C, Gulotta G. Acute appendicitis: should the laparoscopic approach be proposed as the gold standard? Six-year experience in an Emergency Surgery Unit. G Chir. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):174-179
  • 7 Bozkurt MA, Unsal MG, Kapan S, Gonenc M, Dogan M, Kalayci MU, Alis H. Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Feb;41(1):87-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0411-x. Epub 2014 May 31.
  • 8. Ateş O, Hakgüder G, Olguner M, Akgür FM. Tek Trokar İle Karın İçinde Laparoskopik Apendektomi: Yeni Bir Yöntem. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi 2006; 20 (1): 29 - 34
  • 9. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:799-804.
  • 10. Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide. World J Surg. 1999; 23: 835-845.
  • 11. Borgstein PJ, Gordijn RV, Eijsbouts QA, Cuesta MA. Acute appendicitis--a clear- cut case in men, a guessing game in young women A prospective study on the role of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 923-927
  • 12. Tümay LF, Güner OS, Zorluoğlu A. Laparoskopik Apendektomi Deneyimimiz 132 Olgu. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2010;20:115-120
  • 13. Turhan AN, Kapan S, Kütükçü E, Yiğitbaş H, Aygün E. Akut Apandisitte Nonoperatif Takip ve Tedavi. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi 2006;2:134-136
  • 14. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186(5):545-5534
  • 15. Sotelo-Anaya E, Sánchez-Muñoz P, Ploneda Valencia CF, de la Cerda Trujillo LF, Varela-Muñoz O, Gutiérrez-Chávez C, López-Lizarriga CR. Acute appendicitis in an overweight and obese Mexican population: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2012;32:6–9
  • 16. Horvath P, Lange J, Bachmann R, Struller F, Königsrainer A, Zdichavsky M. Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4957-z
  • 17. Kanat BH, Türkoğlu A, Yur M, Girgin M, Aslanmirza MY. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. HealthMED 2013;7 (4) : 1220
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ferhat Çay

Mustafa Girgin This is me

Publication Date April 22, 2018
Submission Date October 31, 2017
Acceptance Date March 6, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Çay F, Girgin M. Laparoskopik Appendektominin Avantaj ve Dezavantajlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;15(1):31-5.

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi  / Journal of Harran University Medical Faculty