The Effects of Macroeconomic Indicators on Leveraged Forex Volume: Evidence from Turkey

Year 2019, Volume: 48 Issue: 2, 160 - 175, 30.11.2019

Tuncay Turan Turaboglu , Tugba Nur Topaloglu , Serdar Yaman

Abstract

In this study, the effects of macroeconomic indicators on leveraged forex volumes of financial intermediary institutions have been analyzed. The study covers the data for the period 2013Q1-2017Q2 of 16 financial intermediary institutions operating in Turkey. In the study in regards to macroeconomic indicators, BIST 100 Index revenues (BIST), consumer price index (CPI), consumer confidence index (CCI), average rate applied to deposits opened by banks (INT), gold prices (GOLD), money supply (M2), external trade export unit index (EUVI) and unemployment rate (UNEMP) have been used. In the study, the effects of macroeconomic indicators on leveraged forex volume have been examined through panel data analysis. As a result of the panel data analysis, it has been determined that the BIST, M2, EUVI and UNEMP variables have positive significant effects on leveraged forex volume and that the INT variable has negative significant effects on leveraged forex volume. In the study, the effects of CPI, CCI and GOLD variables on leveraged forex volume are statistically insignificant. 

Keywords

Forex market, Leveraged forex volume, Macroeconomic indicators, Panel data analysis

Supporting Institution

The authors received no financial support for this work.

References

• Al-Sharkas A. (2004). The dynamic relationship between macroeconomic factors and the jordanian stock market. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 1(1), 97-114.
• Altan M. ve Güzel, F. (2015). Forex piyasasının Türkiye’deki durumu ve Türkiye finans piyasalarına etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 33, 203-214.
• Baltagi, B. H. (2013). Econometric analysis of panel data. Fifth Edition. Chichester: Jhon Wiley&Sons Ltd.
• Born, B. and Breitung, J. (2016). Testing for serial correlation in fixed-effects panel data models. Econometric Reviews, 35(7), 1290-1316.
• Broto, C. (2013). The effectiveness of forex interventions in four Latin American countries.Emerging Markets Review 17. 224-240 Doğukanlı, H. (2012). Uluslararası finans. Üçüncü Baskı. Adana: Karahan Yayınları.
• Égert, B. and Kočenda, E. (2014). The impact of macro news and central bank communication on emerging European forex markets. Economic Saystems, 38, 73-88.
• Ellialtıoğlu, N. (2017). Foreks piyasaları ve Türkiye’de yasal düzenlemeler sonrası uygulama değişikliklerinin analizi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Başken Üniversitesi, Ankara. Financial Information News Network, http://www.finnet2000.com/F2000Plus, [Erişim Tarihi: 18 Kasım 2017].
• Gao, X., An, H., Fang, W. and Sun, X. (2014). The transmission of fluctuant patterns of the forex burden based on international crude oil prices. Energy, 73,380-386.
• Geromichales A. and Jung K.M. (2015). An over-the-counter approach to the forex market. MPRA paper. No.64402
• King, M. and Rime.D. (2010). The $4 trillion question: what explains FX growth since the 2007 survey?. BIS Quarterly Review, December.
• Korkmaz, T., Yıldız, B. ve Gökbulut, R. İ. (2010). FVFM’nin İMKB ulusal 100 endeksindeki geçerliliğinin panel veri analizi ile test edilmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 95-105.
• Köse, Y., Atik, M. and Yılmaz, B. (2014). Foreks işlemlerin davranışsal açıdan incelenmesi: Türk foreks yatırımcıları üzerinde bir araştırma. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 6(4), 1-14.
• Kumar S. (2006). Forecasting volatility-evidence from Indian Stock and Forex Markets. IIMK/WPS/08/ FIN/2006/06
• Moorkerje, R. and Yu, Q. (1997). Macroeconomic variables and stock prices in a small open economy: The case of Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 5(3), 377-388.
• Mukherjee T. K. and Naka A. (1995). Dynamic relations between macroeconomic variables and the Japanese Stock Market: an application of a vector error correction model. Journal of Financial Research, 18(2), 223-237.
• Nathani, N., Bhatnagar, V., Singh, P., Sharma, U., Tiwari, S., Khan, H., Maurya, A., Navratan., Narang, K. and Agarwal, N. (2016). Macroeconomic factors affecting foreign Exchange market in India. S.S. Bhakar ve G. Mathur (eds.). A Systematic Guide from Research to Manuscript. (ss. 67-76). New Delhi (India): Bharti Publications.
• Özmen, N. C. (2011). Uluslararası finansal piyasaların gelişimi ve bir örnek olarak forex piyasalarının İncelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Sarno, L. and Taylor, M. P. (2002). The economics of exchange rates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Shilov, B. N. and Semenov, S. V. (2011). Forex bilmeniz gereken herşey (Çev. Anıl Abbak). İstanbul: Scala Yayıncılık.
• Smith, L. V., Leybourne, S., Kim, T. H. and Newbold, P. (2004). More powerful panel data unit root tests with application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 147-170.
• Şendur, Y. (2017). Forex piyasasında riskler. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 23-28.
• Şendur, Y. and Cihangir, M. (2014). Forex piyasasının kendine has özellikleri ve forex piyasasının pay piyasaları ve futures piyasalarıyla karşılaştırılması. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 28, 537-557.
• Tatoğlu, F. Y. (2013). Panel veri ekonometrisi: Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Basım.
• Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası, Elektronik Veri Dağıtım Sistemi https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/index. php?/evds/serieMarket, [Erişim Tarihi: 18 Kasım 2017].
• Türkiye Sermaye Piyasaları Birliği, https://www.tspb.org.tr/veriler/, [Erişim Tarihi: 18 Kasım 2017].
• Ün, T. (2015). Stata ile panel veri analizi. S. Güriş (eds.) Stata ile panel veri modelleri. (ss. 39-80). İstanbul: Der Kitabevi.
• Vigna P. and Casey M.J. (2017). Kripto para çağı-Bitcoin ve dijital paranın küresel ekonomik sisteme meydan okuması (Çev. Ali Atav). Ankara: Buzdağı Yayınevi.