Alternative Food Networks and Civic Food Initiatives in Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 33, 965 - 1005, 28.09.2021

Emel Karakaya Ayalp

https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.976618

Cited By: 4

Öz

This article handles Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) which have emerged approximately in the last fifteen years in Turkey and discusses Civic Food Initiatives (CFIs) in a historical manner in Turkey. For this, study reviews AFS literature and presents spatial pattern of CFIs in Turkey. Thereby, an image of CFIs’ emergence dates, spatial distribution and agglomerations are exhibited. The data is collected through social media scanning, participatory observation, unstructured interviews and short contacts, internet sources and reports and other secondary sources. The data is collected between 2016 and 2020 and includes 80 initiatives. Results show that CFIs in Turkey points out spatial agglomerations. The location choices and qualities of the initiatives in Turkey support this and the location choices of the initiatives within the city have similar tendencies. Also, almost half of the initiatives emerging in Turkey are located in Istanbul and the other distribution is concentrated on the coastal line.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alternative Food Networks, Civic Food Initiatives, Community Supported Agriculture, Consumer Cooperatives, Turkey

Alternatif Gıda Ağları ve Türkiye’de Yurttaş Temelli Gıda İnisiyatifleri

Öz

Bu makale Türkiye’de yaklaşık son on beş yıldır örgütlenmekte olan, alternatif gıda ağları (AGA)’nı tarihsel olarak ele almakta ve Yurttaş Temelli Gıda İnisiyatifleri (YTGİ)’ni Türkiye ölçeğinde tartışmaktadır. Bu amaçla AGA yazını derlenmiş ve YTGİ’nin Türkiye’deki mekânsal örüntüsü ortaya konmuştur. Böylece hem mekânsal dağılım ve yığılmalar hem de ortaya çıkış tarihlerine göre inisiyatiflerin görünümü sunulmuştur. Keşifsel araştırmaya dayalı olarak kullanılan veri kaynakları; sosyal medya taramasına, katılımcı gözlem yöntemine, yapılandırılmamış görüşmelere ve kısa iletişimlere, internet üzerinden ulaşılabilen kaynaklara ve raporlara ve diğer ikincil veri kaynaklarına dayanmaktadır. Araştırma 2016-2020 yılları arasında toplanan verilere dayanarak 80 adet inisiyatifi kapsamına almıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları göstermiştir ki Türkiye’de YTGİ mekânsal olarak çeşitli yığılmalar biçiminde gelişme göstermiştir. Türkiye’de inisiyatiflerin yer seçimlerine ve niteliklerine bakıldığında bu durum karşılık bulmaktadır. Bunu, inisiyatiflerin kent içerisindeki yer seçimleri de desteklemektedir. Türkiye’de ortaya çıkan inisiyatiflerin neredeyse yarısının İstanbul’da bulunması ve diğer dağılımın da kıyılarda yoğunlaşmış olması çalışmanın ortaya koyduğu sonuçlardandır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Alternatif Gıda Ağları, Yurttaş Temelli Gıda İnisiyatifleri, Topluluk Destekli Tarım, Tüketim Kooperatifleri, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• 1. Alaboz, M. ve Yıldız Sarı, S. E. (2017). Gıda Toplulukları Çalıştayı Sonuç Raporu, Yeryüzü Derneği Yayınları- 6. 18 Ekim 2018 tarihinde https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9kr66xU_6faRG9KTklZNW5FLVU/view adresinden erişildi.
• 2. Anderson, C. R., McDonald, W., Gardiner, J.-L., ve McLachlan, S. M. (2014). Navigating the fault lines in civic food networks. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 4 (3), 79–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2014.043.009
• 3. Aydın, Z. (2016). Çağdaş tarım sorunu ve yeni köylülük. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 43, 43-63.
• 4. Bele, B., Norderhaug, A. ve Sickel, H. (2018). Localized Agri-Food Systems and Biodiversity. Agriculture, 8 (22).
• 5. Bilali, H., E. (2019). Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: A systematic reviewof research themes and an analysis of research gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 353-364.
• 6. Birleşmiş Milletler Gıda ve Tarım Örgütü (FAO) (2007) Profitability and Sustainability of Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture. Agricultural Management, Marketing and Finance Occasional Paper. Roma, İtalya, FAO. 10 Kasım 2020 tarihinde https://ruaf.org/assets/2019/11/Profitability-and-Sustainability.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• 7. Born B. ve Purcell M. (2006). Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2), 195-207.
• 8. Bos, E. ve Owen, L. (2016). Virtual reconnection: The online spaces of alternative food networks in England, Journal of Rural Studies, 45, 1-14.
• 9. Boğaziçi Mensupları Tüketim Kooperatifi (BÜKOOP) (2013, 10 Temmuz). Tüketim Kooperatifi Nedir? (BÜKOOP Toplantı Notları), Zehirsiz Ev.
• 10. Cohen, N. ve Ilieva, R.T. (2015). Transitioning the food system: a strategic practice management approach for cities, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 199-217.
• 11. Corsi, A., Barbera, F., Dansero, E. ve Peano, C. (Der.). (2018). Alternative Food Networks. An Interdisciplinary Assessment. İsviçre: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 12. Daigle, M. (2019). Tracing the terrain of Indigenous food sovereignties. Journal of Peasant Studies, 46 (2), 297-315. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1324423.
• 13. Doğançayır, C. M. (2018). Umut Arşivi: Alternatif Gıda Mekanları Haritası, Beyond İstanbul, 3, 112-118.
• 14. Doğançayır, C. M. ve Kocagöz, U. (2018). Alternatif Gıda İnisiyatifleriyle Söyleşi, Beyond İstanbul, 3,72-112.
• 15. European Community of Consumer Co-operatives (EuroCoop) (2008). Consumer Cooperatives. 12 Aralık 2020 tarihinde https://web.archive.org/web/20120325010525/http://www.eurocoop.org/dmdocuments/publication_report/ConsumerCooperatives08.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• 16. Fonte, M. (2008). Knowledge, Food and Place. A Way of Producing, a Way of Knowing. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), 200-222.
• 17. Friedmann, H. (2005). From colonialism to green capitalism: social movements and emergence of food regimes. F. H. Buttel ve P. McMichael (Der.), New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development içinde (ss. 227-264), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• 18. Geels, F., W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study, Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
• 19. Gopalan, C. (2001). Achieving household nutrition security in societies in transition: an overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 10, 4-12.
• 20. Grasseni, C. (2013). Beyond alternative food networks. Italy’s Solidarity Purchase Groups. Londra, Sydney, New Delhi, New York: Bloomsbury.
• 21. Grauerholz, L. ve Owens, N. (2015). Alternative Food Movements. J. D. Wright (Der.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences içinde (ss. 566-572). Orlando: Elsevier.
• 22. Guthman, J. (2008). Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practices. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 431-447.
• 23. Harris, E. (2009). Neoliberal subjectivities or a politics of the possible? Reading for difference in alternative food networks, Area, 41 (1), 55-63.
• 24. Hazar-Kalonya, D., Ayalp, E., Karakaya Ayalp, E., Candan Demirkol, E., Özden, F., Yıldız, M.Y. vd. (2020). Korona günlerinde tarım ve gıda politikalarını yeniden düşünmek. İ., Olgun, S. Dinç, K. Çılgın ve E. Turgut (Der.), Spektrum 02 Tasarım Rehberleri, Pandemide ve Pot-Pandemide toplum ve mekan: görüşler, öngörüler, öneriler içinde (ss. 117-121).
• 25. Henderson, E. (2010, Şubat). Community supported foods and farming. Urgenci Konferansında sunuldu. Kobe, Japonya. 6 Ocak 2021 tarihinde http://urgenci.net/csa-history/ sayfasından erişildi.
• 26. Hermans, f., Van Apeldoorn, D., Stuvier, M. ve Kok, K. (2013). Niches and networks: explaining network evolution through niche formation process, Research Policy, 42, 613-623.
• 27. Holloway, L., Cox, R., Kneafsey, M., Dowler, E., Venn, L. ve Tuomainen, H. (2010). Are you alternative? ‘Alternative’ food networks and consumers’ definitions of alterity. D. Fuller, A., E., G. Jonas ve R. Lee (Der.), Interrogating alterity: alternative economic and political spaces içinde (ss. 161-175). Farnham: Ashgate.
• 28. Holloway, L., Cox, R., Venn, L., Kneafsey, M., Dowler, E. ve Tuomainen, H. (2006). Managing sustainable farmed landscape through ‘alternative’ food networks: A case study from Italy. The Geographical Journal, 172, 219–229.
• 29. Holt, G. ve Amilien, V. (2007). Introduction: from local food to localised food, Anthropology of Food, Special Issue on Local Food Products and Systems. 16 Mayıs 2018 tarihinde https://aof.revues.org/405?lang=fr adresinden erişildi.
• 30. Hutchens, A. (2009). Changing big business: The globalisation of the Fair Trade movement. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• 31. IFOAM (Uluslararası Organik Tarım Hareketi Federasyonu) (2008). Participatory Guarantee System. 16 Ocak 2021 tarihinde https://www.ifoam.bio/our-work/how/standards-certification/participatory-guarantee-systems#:~:text=%22Participatory%20Guarantee%20Systems%20(PGS),Official%20Definition adresinden erişildi.
• 32. Ilbery, B. ve Maye, D. (2005). Alternative (shorter) food supply chains in specialist livestock products in the Scottish-English borders. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 823-844.
• 33. Ilbery, B., Watts, D., Simpson, S., Gilg, A., & Little, J. (2006). Mapping local foods: evidence from two English regions. British Food Journal, 108 (3), 213-225.
• 34. Jarosz, L. (2000). Understanding agri-food networks as social relations. Agriculture and Human Values, 17, 279–283.
• 35. Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24, 231–244.
• 36. Kadirbeyoglu, Z. ve Konya, N. (2017). Alternative Food Initiatives in Turkey. F. Adaman, B. Akbulut ve M. Arsel (Der.), Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment Under Erdogan içinde (ss. 2017-230). Londra: I.B. Tauris.
• 37. Karakaya, E. (2016). Agro food system transitions? Exploring alternative agro food initiatives in İzmir, Turkey (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• 38. Karakaya Ayalp, E. (2020). Tarımsal Gıda Sistemleri Dönüşüyor mu? İzmir’de Alternatif Tarımsal Gıda İnisiyatifleri. Toplum ve Bilim, 153, 49-81.
• 39. Kizos, T. ve Vakoufaris, H. (2011). Alternative Agri-Food Geographies? Geographic Indications in Greece. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 102, 220–235.
• 40. Lawhon, M. ve Murphy, J.T. (2012). Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology, Progress in Human Geography, 36, 354-378.
• 41. Lawson, L., (2005). City Bountiful: A Century of Community Gardening in America. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• 42. Leitch, A. (2013). Slow Food and the Politics of 'Virtuous Globalization. C. Counihan ve P. van Esterik (Der.), Food and Culture: A Reader içinde (ss. 409-425). New York: Routledge.
• 43. Levidow, L., (2015). European transitions towards a corporate-environmental food regime: agroecological incorporation or contestation? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 1127-1155.
• 44. Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Majewski, E., Wąs, A., Borgen, S., O., Csillag, P., Donati, M., Freeman, R., Hoàng, V., Lecoeur, J-L., Mancini, M., C., Nguyen, A., Saïdi, M., Tocco, B., Török, Á., Veneziani, M., Vittersø, G. ve Wavresky, P. (2019). Measuring the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability of Short Food Supply Chains. Sustainability, 11 (15).
• 45. Marsden, T., Banks, J. ve Bristow, E., G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 424–438.
• 46. Martindale, L. (2020). “I will know it when I taste it”: trust, food materialities and social media in Chinese alternative food networks, Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10155-0.
• 47. McMichael, P. (2008). Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2-3), 205-228.
• 48. Moragues-Faus, A. ve Morgan, K. (2015). Reframing the foodscape: the emergent World of urban food policy, Environment and Planning: Economy and Space, 47, 1558-1573.
• 49. Muchnick, J. (2009, Mayıs). Localised agrifood systems: concept development and diversity of situations. Annual Meetings of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society and the Association for the Study of Food and Society’de sunuldu, State College, Pensilvanya.
• 50. Özden, F. (2020). Gıda Etiği Bağlamında Topluluk Destekli Tarım Modeli Üzerine Bir İnceleme, Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi, 7 (3), 84-98.
• 51. Parot, J. (2015). AMAP, the French CSA model: Business as usual or social movement? Urgenci International Network Working Paper Series No. 2. 10 Ocak 2021 tarihinde http://urgenci.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/PAROT_CASS_ARTICLE_2015.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• 52. Phillipov, M. ve Kirkwood, K. (Der.) (2019). Alternative Food Politics. From the Margins to the Mainstream. Londra: Routledge.
• 53. Psarikidou, K. ve Szerszynski, B. (2012). The moral economy of civic food networks in Manchester. The International Journal for the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19 (3), 309-317.
• 54. Qazi, J. A. ve Selfa, T. L. (2005). The politics of building alternative agro-food networks in the belly of agro-industry. Food, Culture and Society: an International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(1), 45-72.
• 55. Renting, H., Marsden, T. K. ve Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35, 393-411.
• 56. Renting, H., Schermer, M. ve Rossi, A. (2012). Building food democracy: exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19 (3), 289-307.
• 57. Requier-Desjardins, D. (2010). The evolution of LAS debate: an economist’s view. Conference of Réunion du réseau SYAL’da sunuldu, Stockholm. 9 Mayıs 2021 tarihinde https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281747149_The_evolution_of_LAS_de bate_an_economist%27s_view adresinden erişildi.
• 58. Schneider, T., Eli, K., Dolan, C. ve Ulijaszek, S. (2018). Digital Food Activism. Londra: Routledge.
• 59. Sforzi, F. ve Mancini, M., C. (2015). A reinterpretation of the agri-food system and its spatial dynamics through the industrial district. M., C., Mancini ve M., Donati (Der.), Local agri-food systems in a global world: market, social and environmental challenges içinde (ss. 9-29). New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• 60. Slee, B. ve Kirwan J. (2009) Exploring hybridity in food supply chains. M. Canavari, N. Cantore, A. Castellini, E. Pignatti ve R. Spadoni (Der.), International Marketing and Trade of Quality Food Products içinde (ss. 131-150). Hollanda: Wageningen Akademik Baskı.
• 61. Smith, A. (2006). Green niches in sustainable development: the case of organic food in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, 439-458.
• 62. Sonnino, R. ve Marsden T. (2006). Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 181–199.
• 63. Tregear, A. (2011). Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 419–430.
• 64. Türkkan, C. (2019). Clean foods, motherhood and alternative food networks in contemporary Istanbul, Gender, Place and Culture, 26 (2), 181-202.
• 65. Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2008). The new peasantries: struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Londra: Earthscan.
• 66. Van der Ploeg, J., D., Jingzhong, Y. ve Schneider, S. (2012). Rural development through the construction of new, nested, markets: comparative perspectives from China, Brazil and the European Union. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (1), 133-173.
• 67. Van der Ploeg, J., D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., De Roest, K., Sevilla-Guzmán, E., ve Ventura, F. (2002). Rural development: from practices towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 391-408.
• 68. Venn, L., Kneafsey, M., Holloway, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E. ve Tuomainen, H. (2006). Researching European ‘alternative’ food networks: some methodological considerations. Area, 38(3), 248-258.
• 69. Whatmore, S., Stassart, P. ve Renting, H. (2003). What's alternative about alternative food networks?. Environment and Planning A, 35, 389-391.
• 70. Whatmore, S. ve Thorne, L. (1997). Nourishing Networks. Alternative Geographies of Food. D. Goodman, M. Watts ve M. J. Watts (Der.), Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring içinde (ss. 211–224). London: Routledge.
• 71. Yılmaz, F., Acar, S., Bilen Kazancık, L., Gültekin, L., Meydan, M.,C., Özsan, M.,E. ve Işık, M. (2019). İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması araştırması, Araştırma Rapor Sayı: 2. Ankara: Kalkınma Ajansları Genel Müdürlüğü Yayını.