Research Article

Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value

Number: 30 August 31, 2026
EN TR

Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the planned lunch menus of two state universities in İzmir and Istanbul that offer vegan and vegetarian options through a theoretical analysis of energy and nutrient content.

Method: In this descriptive study, one-month (29-day) lunch menus obtained from official university websites were analysed for food groups, energy, and nutrient content. Nutrient values were calculated using standard institutional recipes in the Nutrition Information System (BEBIS) 9.0 and compared with the Turkish Nutrition Guide (TUBER) 2022 to assess lunch-level energy and nutrient adequacy. The analysis reflects theoretical values based on planned menus rather than actual served portions or consumption.

Results: The non-vegetarian menu of University B contained higher levels of dietary fibre, vitamins C, B1, B6, B12, iron, zinc, and sodium than University A. In vegetarian menus, University B showed higher values of dietary fibre, vitamins C, B1, B2, B6, and sodium, whereas the vegan menu of University A contained higher energy and fat levels. According to the reference framework used, vegetarian menus appeared to meet most nutrient requirements except vitamin B12, while vitamin B12 and calcium remained below the reference range in vegan menus.

Conclusion: This theoretical analysis suggests that vegetarian menus generally align with lunch-level nutrient recommendations and that appropriately planned vegetarian and vegan menus may provide nutritionally adequate meal options, whereas potential insufficiencies in vitamin B12 and calcium may exist in vegan menus. These findings should be interpreted within the context of planned menus rather than actual consumption.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Kiely ME. Risks and benefits of vegan and vegetarian diets in children. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021;80(2):159–164. doi: 10.1017/S002966512100001X.
  2. 2. Craig WJ, Mangels AR, Fresán U, et al. The safe and effective use of plant-based diets with guidelines for health professionals. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):4144. doi: 10.3390/nu13114144.
  3. 3. Bakaloudi DR, Halloran A, Rippin HL, et al. Intake and adequacy of the vegan diet: A systematic review of the evidence. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):3503–3521. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.035.
  4. 4. Alexy U. Diet and growth of vegetarian and vegan children. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2023;6. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000697.
  5. 5. Cramer H, Kessler CS, Sundberg T, et al. Characteristics of Americans choosing vegetarian and vegan diets for health reasons. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017;49(7):561-567.
  6. 6. Fresán U, Sabaté J. Vegetarian diets: Planetary health and its alignment with human health. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(4):388. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz019.
  7. 7. Al-Mohaithef M. Prevalence of vegan/vegetarian diet and eating behavior among Saudi adults and its correlation with body mass index: A cross-sectional study. Front Nutr. 2022;9:966629. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.966629.
  8. 8. González-García S, Esteve-Llorens X, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. Carbon footprint and nutritional quality of different human dietary choices. Sci Total Environ. 2018;644:77–94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.339.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Nutrition and Dietetics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

August 31, 2026

Publication Date

August 31, 2026

Submission Date

November 11, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 30, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 30

APA
Yalçın Çeliktaş, B., Garipağoğlu, M., Koçak, İ., & Geyik, M. (2026). Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, 30, 711-722. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1583037
AMA
1.Yalçın Çeliktaş B, Garipağoğlu M, Koçak İ, Geyik M. Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value. IGUSABDER. 2026;(30):711-722. doi:10.38079/igusabder.1583037
Chicago
Yalçın Çeliktaş, Bahar, Muazzez Garipağoğlu, İlayda Koçak, and Mislina Geyik. 2026. “Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, nos. 30: 711-22. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1583037.
EndNote
Yalçın Çeliktaş B, Garipağoğlu M, Koçak İ, Geyik M (August 1, 2026) Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences 30 711–722.
IEEE
[1]B. Yalçın Çeliktaş, M. Garipağoğlu, İ. Koçak, and M. Geyik, “Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value”, IGUSABDER, no. 30, pp. 711–722, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.38079/igusabder.1583037.
ISNAD
Yalçın Çeliktaş, Bahar - Garipağoğlu, Muazzez - Koçak, İlayda - Geyik, Mislina. “Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences. 30 (August 1, 2026): 711-722. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1583037.
JAMA
1.Yalçın Çeliktaş B, Garipağoğlu M, Koçak İ, Geyik M. Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value. IGUSABDER. 2026;:711–722.
MLA
Yalçın Çeliktaş, Bahar, et al. “Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value”. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, no. 30, Aug. 2026, pp. 711-22, doi:10.38079/igusabder.1583037.
Vancouver
1.Bahar Yalçın Çeliktaş, Muazzez Garipağoğlu, İlayda Koçak, Mislina Geyik. Evaluation of Vegetarian and Vegan Menus Served in University Cafeterias in Terms of Nutritional Value. IGUSABDER. 2026 Aug. 1;(30):711-22. doi:10.38079/igusabder.1583037

 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)