ijasos IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 2411-183X OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research 10.18769/ijasos.309681 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION AS A FACTOR OF MODERNIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY Nurzhanova Zhainash Kurmanbayeva Assel Dauletbayeva Gaukhar Maden Marfina Temirkhan Sagdat 04 30 2017 3 7 240 250 01 09 2017 03 29 2017 Copyright © 2015, IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences 2015 IJASOS- International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences

Thisarticle is devoted to the theme of intercultural communication as a factor inthe modernization of educational activities. The need for the formation ofstudent’s ability to intercultural communication studies led to the relevanceof the process of mastering the laws of any age nonnative language in thelanguage environment, as well as analysis of the factors that determine thesuccess / failure of this process.Inrecent years it has become apparent that the communication is a transmissionfrom the addressee is not sent to the specific information. Communication flowsmore successfully than wider area of intersection of these spaces. Communicantsimportant to have core knowledge and understanding, which is shared by allmembers of the linguaethnocultural community. Consequently, the student and theteacher should have a thorough understanding of the opportunities enjoyed bythe study group, school, and region to create conditions for the formation ofcross-cultural communication, both within the country and abroad.CommunicationThrough Culture provides: 1) the identity of the individual; 2) the interactionof the individual and society; 3) coordination of the activities of individualsamong themselves; 4) the integration of social groups and social cohesion as awhole; 5) internal differentiation of society and the individual groups; 6) exchangeof achievements between individuals, groups of individuals and nations.Languagecan be seen as a tool for organizing meanings produced as a result of mental,emotional and mirosozertsatelnoy human activity, and as a means of transmissionof meanings from one communicant to another. Contact natural language andculture is as follows: 1) the language contributes to the identification of theobjects of the world (natural and man-made), their classification and orderingof information about him; 2) it helps to evaluate the objects, phenomena andtheir relationship; 3) facilitate human adaptation to environmental conditions;4) promote the organization and coordination of human activity; 5) allows youto get psychological support for the correctness of their actions on othermembers of a linguistic community.Thus, thelanguage is an integral part of the spiritual culture of mankind together withother sign systems, which include the language of architecture, drama, music,dance, national symbols, rites, rituals, and others. Communication is acreative act of intuitive, which is based on an inherent and integral humanneed to communicate.Formation of interculturalcompetence should be seen in connection with the development of the student'spersonality, his ability and willingness to participate in the dialogue ofcultures on the basis of the principles of cooperation, mutual respect andtolerance for cultural differences and overcoming cultural barriers,particularly for modern foreign language teaching. That person Dialogism it isan important factor (ID) of and as a result makes it capable of participatingin the dialogue of cultures.Thus, the process of formationof the intercultural competence of the student's vocation to expand its overalloutlook and overall competence. The development of the individual student, isin the comparison of at least two linguocultures, carried out on the basis oftheir own world view and understanding of the world and involves the perceptionand reflection of their own values ​​and social relationships.

 intercultural communication foreign language learning communicative competence social groups the dialogue of cultures Davidson D., Mitrofanova O.D. (1990). Russian language and literature in dialogue nations of the world: the problem of functioning and teaching. Functioning of the Russian language: methodical aspect: plenary report, p.3. Khaleeva I.I. (1989). Basic theory of learning foreign speech understanding (training interpreter). Moscow Journal of Higher School, p. 238. Ushakova T.N. (1986). Speech as a cognitive process and as a means of communication. Cognitive Psychology, p.137. Baryshnikov N.V. (2000). Fundamentals of professional intercultural communication. Moscow. pp.5-13. Hall E. (1959). The Silent Language. The mute language, p.169. Frake C. (1981). Plying Frames Can Be Dangerous: Some Reflections on Methodology in Cognitive Anthropology. Language, Culture and Cognition / ed. by R. Casson. NY: Macmillan, pp.138-150. Weaver G.R. (1993). Understanding and Coping with Cross-Cultural Adjustment Stress // Education for the Intercultural Experience / ed. by R.M. Paige. U.S.A .: Intercultural Press, pp.137-167. Kosherbaeva G.N. (2003). Intercultural dialogue in the process of extracurricular activities. Scientific application of the international scientific-pedagogical magazine "Higher School of Kazakhstan", abstract №2, pp.80-84. Temirgazina Z.K. (2003). Intercultural and interethnic communication: to the problem. Problems of intercultural communication in the modern educational space. Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference. - Tobolsk, pp.188-190. Dzhanseitova S.S. (2002). Art and shaped the concept of the concept of "dialogue of cultures". Bulletin of KNU. A series of philological №54 (3), pp.165-170. Gal’skova N.D. (2000). Contemporary methods of teaching foreign languages. Teachers book, Arcti-Glossa. p.165. Vorobjev G.A. (2003). The development of socio-cultural competence. Foreign Languages in School. p.98. Milrud, V.P. (2004). Competence in language learning. Foreign Languages in School. p.176. Safonova V.V. (2001). Cultural studies in the modern language education. Foreign Languages in School. p.220. Dyachenko M.I. & Kandybovich L.A. (1976). Psychological problems of readiness for activities. Publishing House of the Belarusian University. p.114. Stepanov P.P. (2001). A tolerant person: How to bring him up. Public Education. p.208. Astashova N.A. (2003). The problem of formation of tolerance in the system of educational institutions. Tolerant Consciousness and Formation of Tolerant Relations (Theory and Practice). p.163. Adzhieva E.M. (2003). Ethnopedagogical and ethnopsycological conditions of fostering of tolerance. Tolerant Consciousness and Formation of Tolerant Relations (Theory and Practice). p.182. Ustinenko V.M. (1980). The place and role of the phenomenon of the game in the culture. Philosophy. p.136. Mardakhaev L.V. (2005). Social pedagogics. Book. Moscow. Gardariki. p.269.