Policy intervention and its consequences on the environment to combat climate change– A case from Bhutan

Year 2021, , 132 - 142, 30.09.2021

Hemlal Bhattarai

https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.941741

Abstract

The world today is racing in the phase of the industrialization revolution where the concern is raised in many forums about the carbon footprint due to manmade actions giving thought-provoking highlight of actions towards energy usages and consequences to the environment. Strong linkage exists between energy and environments having direct relevance to the country's GDP. Countries are considering policies and strategies towards reducing Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is prime GHG that are released due to human activities. The developing countries are facing stiff challenges to balance their economic development and their dependency on the usage of energies. The study aimed to find out the cases of Bhutan with a target to understand the key actions that the country has been taking especially through policy interventions. The method used in this paper is a qualitative approach through collections of secondary data through literature review and drawing the results through the evidence in the forms of figures and tables. Results reveals that Bhutan has adopted multiple policies interventions, strategies and timely actions for environment and climate changes in fulfilling the ‘Paris Agreement on Climate Change’. Bhutan has been instrumental in the implementations of relevant policies/regulations which is guided by the philosophy of Gross National Happiness (GNH) which follows the middle path of holistic socioeconomic development for economic growth as well in-line with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Bhutan proudly stands as being the carbon-negative country where its annual consumption of CO2 is much more compared to what it produced.

Keywords

Bhutan, Greenhouse Gas (GHG), Gross National Happiness (GNH), Holistic socioeconomic development, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Supporting Institution

Centre for Lighting and Energy Efficiency Studies (CLEES), JNEC, RUB

Project Number

NA

References

• Pawelzik, P., Carus, M., Hotchkiss, J. et.al. 2013. Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73, 211-228.
• GHGP. Product life accounting and reporting standard. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2011. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/ standards/product-standard
• Stavins, R. N., and Stowe, R. C. 2018. International cooperation in East Asia to address climate change. Harvard Project on Climate Agreements With the support of The Harvard Global Institute. https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/harvard-project-east-asia.pdf. (February 2018.)
• Althor, G., Watson, J. E., and Fuller, R. A. 2016. Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Scientific Reports, 6(1). 1-6.
• Zhang, X., and Xu, J. 2018. Optimal policies for climate change: A joint consideration of CO2 and methane. Applied Energy, 211, 1021-1029.
• Ekwurzel, B., Boneham, J., Dalton, M. W. et.al. 2017. The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers. Climatic Change, 144(4), 579-590.
• Adzawla, W., Sawaneh, M., and Yusuf, A. M. 2019. Greenhouse gasses emission and economic growth nexus of sub-Saharan Africa. Scientific African, 3, e00065.
• Climate Analytics, Decarbonising South and South East Asia: Shifting energy supply in South Asia and South East Asia to non-fossil fuel-based energy systems in line with the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal and achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. 1-80. (May 2019.)
• NEC, RGoB, 2020. Third National Communication to the UNFCCC, National Environment Commission of Bhutan, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/TNC%20of%20Bhutan%202020.pdf. 1-182. (November 2020.)
• MacLeod, M., Moran, D. et.al. 2010. Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK. Agricultural Systems, 103(4), 198-209.
• Rehan, R. and Nehdi, M. 2005. Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: Policy implications for the cement industry. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(2), 105-114.
• NSB, RGoB. Population and Housing Census of Bhutan. National Statistics Bureau, Bhutan, 2017.
• NSB, RGoB. Statistical Year Book. National Statistics Bureau, Bhutan, 2019.
• GNH Centre, Bhutan, What is GNH. http://www.gnhcentrebhutan.org/what-is-gnh/the-4-pillars-of-gnh/ (20th April 2021.)
• Montes, J., and Bhattarai, S. R. 2018. Buddhist biopower? – Variegated governmentality in Bhutan’s gross national happiness agenda. Geoforum, 96, 207-216.
• RGoB, The Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan, Royal Government of Bhutan, Bhutan, 2008.
• Wester, P. Mishra, A. Mukherji, A. and Shrestha, A. B. The Hindu Kush Himalaya assessment: Mountains, climate change, sustainability and people. Springer, 2019.
• Tobias, M. C. and Morrison, J. G. Why life matters: Fifty ecosystems of the heart and mind, Springer, 2014.
• Stefan, P. Gross National Happiness-Bhutan’s Vision of Development and its challenges.
• Tho, H. V. Gross National Happiness as an alternative development paradigm and its relevance for community living, Euroasia learning Institute for happiness and wellbeing, 2018, https://elihw.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ELI_Camphill_and_TTG_V2_WEB-ilovepdf-compressed.pdf
• GHNC, RGoB. 13th Round Table Meeting, Gross National Happiness for the global goals, Gross National Happiness Commission, 2017, https://www.gnhc.gov.bt/13rtm/
• NEC, RGoB, Second National Communication to UNFCCC, National Environment Commission of Bhutan, 2011, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/snc_bhutan.pdf.
• Crippa, M. Oreggioni, G. Guizzardi, D. et.al. Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries, EUR 29849 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2019, ISBN 978-92-76-11100-9.
• NEC, RGoB, Third National Communication to UNFCCC, National Environment Commission of Bhutan, 2020, http://www.nec.gov.bt/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/TNC_2020_Oct_Final.pdf.
• Worldometers, Bhutan Co2 emission, 2021, https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/bhutan-co2-emissions/. (20 April 2021.)
• Jamyag D. Dorji, S. et al. 2013. Public Awareness of Environmental Policies in Bhutan, BJRD, 1-14.
• MoEA, RGoB, Economic Development Policy, Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2016.
• RGoB, Sustainable Development and Happiness, 2018, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19369Bhutan_NSDGR_Bhutan_2018.pdf.
• Bale, C. S. Varga, L. and Foxon, T. J. 2015. Energy and complexity: New ways forward, Applied Energy, 138, 150-159.
• DRE, RGoB, National Energy Efficiency Roadmap, Department of Renewable Energy, 2019.
• Bhattarai. H. 2021. Policy Driven Initiative for Promoting Electric Vehicles to Combat Climate Change in the Developing Countries: A case from Bhutan, IOER-IMRJ, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 11-20.
• Druk Green Power Corporation Ltd., 2021, https://www.drukgreen.bt/
• Månberger, A. 2018. Deep Decarbonization and Energy Security for Low-Carbon Societies, Green Growth and Decarbonization of Energy Systems in a Changing World. Rocamora, A. R. & Ishikawa, T. (eds.). Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), p. 14-16.
• National Newspaper, Bhutan Green House Gas Emission to Rise if nothing changes, Kuensel Coorporation, Bhutan, https://kuenselonline.com/bhutans-greenhouse-gas-emissions-to-rise-if-nothing-changes/, 2021.
• Yangka, D. and Newman, P. 2018. Bhutan: Can the 1.5 °C agenda be integrated with growth in wealth and happiness? Urban Planning, 3(2), 94-112.
• ADB, Bhutan Transport 2040 Integrated Strategic Vision, Asian Development Bank, 2013.