Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 217 - 221, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033791

Abstract

Big percent of aerodynamic drag forces of road vehicles are pressure based. Therefore, it is important to examine the flow structure around the vehicles and take precautions against it. These studies are the subject of aerodynamics. Active and passive flow control are used to control the flow around the vehicle. In related studies, the use of CFD is a great advantage. In this study CFD method was used the verify of experimental drag reduction. The CFD tests were conducted at 6 different free flow velocities between the range of 3.8×103-7.9×103 Re. The model bus was drawn in SolidWorks after by 3D scanned. 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm diameter flow control rods were drawn and mounted at 3 different distance (L/H) to front surface of bus. CFD analyses were performed at the same test conditions for the least drag coefficient model. The experimental results were supported by CFD analyses in Fluent® program with 1.81% error margin. Detailed flow structures around the bus model and pressure distribution were determined by the CFD method.

References

  • Cattafesta, L. N., and Sheplak, M. 2011. Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 43(1), 247-272.
  • Altaf, A., Omar, A. Asrar. W. 2014. Review of passive drag reduction techniques for bluff road vehicles. IIUM Engineering Journal, 15(1), 61-69.
  • Wood, R.M., and Bauer, S.X.S. 2003. Simple and low cost aerodynamic drag reduction devices for tractor-trailer Trucks. SAE Technical Paper, 01(3377), 1-18.
  • Cui, W., Zhu, H., Xia. C. Yanga. Z. 2015. Comparison of steady blowing and synthetic jets for aerodynamic drag reduction of a simplified vehicle. Procedia Engineering, 126, 388-392.
  • Bayındırlı. C., Akansu, Y.E. Celik, M. 2020. Experimental And Numerical Studies On Improvement Of Drag Force Of A Bus Model Using Different Spoiler Models. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Systems, 27(6), 743-776.
  • Hucho. W. H., and Sovran. G. 1993. Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 25(1), 485-537.
  • Khalighi, B., Ho, J. Cooney, J. Neiswander, B. Corke, T. Han, T. 2016. Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Investigation for a Simplified Road Vehicle Using Plasma Flow Control. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting.
  • Tian, J., Zhang, Y. Zhu, H. Xiao, H. 2017. Aerodynamic drag reduction and flow control of Ahmed body with flaps. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(7), 1-17.
  • Bruneau, C.H., Creusé, E. Depeyras, D. Gilliéron, P. Mortazavi, I. 2010. Coupling active and passive techniques to control the flow past the square back Ahmed body. Computers & Fluids, 39,1875-1892.
  • Mominul, I.M. and Mohammad, Z.A. 2019. Review on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of Vehicles. International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture, 4(1), 1-14.
  • Yağız, B., Kandil, O. Pehlivanoglu, V.Y. 2012. Drag minimization using active and passive flow control technique. Aerospace Science and Technology, 17(1), 21–31.
  • Sudin, M.N., Abdullah, M.A., Shamsuddin, S.A. Ramli, F.R. Tahir, M.M. 2014. Review of research on aerodynamic drag reduction method. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS, 14(2), 35-45.
  • Mohamed, E.A., Radhwi, M.N. Abdel Gawad, A.F. 2015. Computational investigation of aerodynamic characteristics and drag reduction of a bus model. American Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2(1-1), 64-73.
  • Gillieron, P. and Kourta, A. 2013. Massive separation control analysis of the pulsed jet actuators effects. Mechanics & Industry, 14, 441-445.
  • Bayindirli, C. 2021. Reducing of Pressure Based Drag Force of a Bus Model by Flow Control Rod in Wind Tunnel. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, 5(4), 412-418.
  • Çengel. Y.A. Cimbala. J.M. 2008. Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications Güven Scientific Publications, 562-599.
  • Bayindirli, C. Celik. M. 2018. The experimentally and numerically determination of the drag coefficient of a bus model. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 7(3), 117-123.
Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 217 - 221, 31.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033791

Abstract

References

  • Cattafesta, L. N., and Sheplak, M. 2011. Actuators for active flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 43(1), 247-272.
  • Altaf, A., Omar, A. Asrar. W. 2014. Review of passive drag reduction techniques for bluff road vehicles. IIUM Engineering Journal, 15(1), 61-69.
  • Wood, R.M., and Bauer, S.X.S. 2003. Simple and low cost aerodynamic drag reduction devices for tractor-trailer Trucks. SAE Technical Paper, 01(3377), 1-18.
  • Cui, W., Zhu, H., Xia. C. Yanga. Z. 2015. Comparison of steady blowing and synthetic jets for aerodynamic drag reduction of a simplified vehicle. Procedia Engineering, 126, 388-392.
  • Bayındırlı. C., Akansu, Y.E. Celik, M. 2020. Experimental And Numerical Studies On Improvement Of Drag Force Of A Bus Model Using Different Spoiler Models. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Systems, 27(6), 743-776.
  • Hucho. W. H., and Sovran. G. 1993. Aerodynamics of road vehicles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 25(1), 485-537.
  • Khalighi, B., Ho, J. Cooney, J. Neiswander, B. Corke, T. Han, T. 2016. Aerodynamic Drag Reduction Investigation for a Simplified Road Vehicle Using Plasma Flow Control. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting.
  • Tian, J., Zhang, Y. Zhu, H. Xiao, H. 2017. Aerodynamic drag reduction and flow control of Ahmed body with flaps. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(7), 1-17.
  • Bruneau, C.H., Creusé, E. Depeyras, D. Gilliéron, P. Mortazavi, I. 2010. Coupling active and passive techniques to control the flow past the square back Ahmed body. Computers & Fluids, 39,1875-1892.
  • Mominul, I.M. and Mohammad, Z.A. 2019. Review on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of Vehicles. International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture, 4(1), 1-14.
  • Yağız, B., Kandil, O. Pehlivanoglu, V.Y. 2012. Drag minimization using active and passive flow control technique. Aerospace Science and Technology, 17(1), 21–31.
  • Sudin, M.N., Abdullah, M.A., Shamsuddin, S.A. Ramli, F.R. Tahir, M.M. 2014. Review of research on aerodynamic drag reduction method. International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS, 14(2), 35-45.
  • Mohamed, E.A., Radhwi, M.N. Abdel Gawad, A.F. 2015. Computational investigation of aerodynamic characteristics and drag reduction of a bus model. American Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2(1-1), 64-73.
  • Gillieron, P. and Kourta, A. 2013. Massive separation control analysis of the pulsed jet actuators effects. Mechanics & Industry, 14, 441-445.
  • Bayindirli, C. 2021. Reducing of Pressure Based Drag Force of a Bus Model by Flow Control Rod in Wind Tunnel. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, 5(4), 412-418.
  • Çengel. Y.A. Cimbala. J.M. 2008. Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications Güven Scientific Publications, 562-599.
  • Bayindirli, C. Celik. M. 2018. The experimentally and numerically determination of the drag coefficient of a bus model. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies, 7(3), 117-123.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Mechanical Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Cihan Bayındırlı 0000-0001-9199-9670

Mehmet Çelik 0000-0002-3390-1716

Publication Date December 31, 2021
Submission Date December 7, 2021
Acceptance Date December 23, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 8 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Bayındırlı, C., & Çelik, M. (2021). The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, 8(4), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033791
AMA Bayındırlı C, Çelik M. The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic. IJEAT. December 2021;8(4):217-221. doi:10.31593/ijeat.1033791
Chicago Bayındırlı, Cihan, and Mehmet Çelik. “The Verify of Experimentally Drag Reduction by Flow Control Rod Application on Bus Model Using Computational Fluid Dynamic”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8, no. 4 (December 2021): 217-21. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033791.
EndNote Bayındırlı C, Çelik M (December 1, 2021) The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8 4 217–221.
IEEE C. Bayındırlı and M. Çelik, “The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic”, IJEAT, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 217–221, 2021, doi: 10.31593/ijeat.1033791.
ISNAD Bayındırlı, Cihan - Çelik, Mehmet. “The Verify of Experimentally Drag Reduction by Flow Control Rod Application on Bus Model Using Computational Fluid Dynamic”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies 8/4 (December 2021), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033791.
JAMA Bayındırlı C, Çelik M. The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic. IJEAT. 2021;8:217–221.
MLA Bayındırlı, Cihan and Mehmet Çelik. “The Verify of Experimentally Drag Reduction by Flow Control Rod Application on Bus Model Using Computational Fluid Dynamic”. International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies, vol. 8, no. 4, 2021, pp. 217-21, doi:10.31593/ijeat.1033791.
Vancouver Bayındırlı C, Çelik M. The verify of experimentally drag reduction by flow control rod application on bus model using computational fluid dynamic. IJEAT. 2021;8(4):217-21.