Color filter effects on the performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic solar panels

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 14 - 20, 30.06.2023

Sündüz Gökçen Necati Kaya

https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1201422

Abstract

We evaluated effect of different color filters on the electric production performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar photovoltaic panels in real outdoor environment. In the experiment, we used four different color filters from blue to red on photovoltaic panels to observe energy and efficiency performance of the mono and polycrystalline solar photovoltaic panels as well as temperature of the panels measured with and without filters. We observed the wavelength dependence of monocrystalline photovoltaic panel is more effective than the polycrystalline photovoltaic panel one. For both panels we see that yellow color filtered produced the highest power value and have the lowest temperature value. This can be explained with that the spectrum of yellow color filter covers most of the radiation of solar but blocking infrared and ultraviolet side of the sun spectrum. This also causes the lower panel temperature. On the other hand, we observed that photovoltaic panels with blue color filter have the highest temperature value and the lowest power value. By the study we suggest that by optimizing the semiconductor band gaps in photovoltaic panels respect to solar wavelength, one can produce photovoltaic panels with higher efficiency by using filters, especially in hot climate regions. We expected that the results will also contribute to a better analysis of the points that need to be developed during the photovoltaic panel production stages.

Keywords

Fİlter effect, Efficiency, Wavelength, Photovoltaic, Solar energy

Project Number

FYL-2020-3244

References

• Pavlović, T., Milosavlyevic, D., Radonjic, I. and Pantic, L. 2013. Possibility of electricity generation using PV solar plants in Serbia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 20, 201-218.
• El-Shimy, M. 2009. Viability analysis of PV power plants in Egypt. Renewable Energy, 34(10), 2187-2196.
• Decker, B. and Jahn, U. 1997. Performance of 170 grid connected PV plants in northern Germany—analysis of yields and optimization potentials. Solar Energy, 59(4-6), 127-133.
• Solangi, K.H., Islam, M.R., Saidur, R., Rahim N.A. and Fayaz, H. 2011. A review on global solar energy policy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(4), 2149-2163.
• Armaroli, N. and Balzani, V. 2007. The Future of Energy Supply: Challenges and Opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 46(1‐2), 52-66.
• Simmons, A.D. and Infield, D.G. 1996. Grid‐connected amorphous silicon photovoltaic array. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 4(5), 381-388.
• Akhmad, K., Kitamura, A., Yamamoto, F., Okamoto, H., Takakura, H. and Hamakawa, Y. 1997. Outdoor performance of amorphous silicon and polycrystalline silicon PV modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 46(3), 209-218.
• Carr, A. and Pryor, T. 2004. A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates. Solar energy, 76(1-3), 285-294.
• Cañete, C., Carretero, J. and Sidrach-de-Cardona, M. 2014. Energy performance of different photovoltaic module technologies under outdoor conditions. Energy, 65, 295-302.
• Marion, B., Deceglie, M.G. and Silverman, T.J. 2014. Analysis of measured photovoltaic module performance for Florida, Oregon, and Colorado locations. Solar energy, 110, 736-744.
• Makrides, G., Zinsser, B., Phinikarides, A., Schubert, M. and Georghiou, G.E. 2012. Temperature and thermal annealing effects on different photovoltaic technologies. Renewable Energy, 43, 407-417.
• Eke, R. and Demircan, H. 2013. Performance analysis of a multi crystalline Si photovoltaic module under Mugla climatic conditions in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management, 65, 580-586.
• Minemoto, T., Nagae, S. and Takakura, H. 2007. Impact of spectral irradiance distribution and temperature on the outdoor performance of amorphous Si photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 91(10), 919-923.
• Simon, M. and Meyer, E.L. 2011. The effects of spectral evaluation of c-Si modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 19(1), 1-10.
• Sharma, V., Kumar, A., Sastry, O.S. and Chandel, S.S. 2013. Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions. Energy, 58, 511-518.
• Leloux, J., L. Narvarte, and D. Trebosc, Review of the performance of residential PV systems in France. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012. 16(2): p. 1369-1376.
• Leloux, J., Narvarte, L. and Trebosc, D. 2012. Review of the performance of residential PV systems in Belgium. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 178-184.
• Micheli, D., Alessandrini, S., Radu, R. and Casula, I. 2014. Analysis of the outdoor performance and efficiency of two grid connected photovoltaic systems in northern Italy. Energy Conversion and Management, 80, 436-445.
• Jahn, U. and Nasse, W. 2004. Operational performance of grid‐connected PV systems on buildings in Germany. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 12(6), 441-448.
• Elibol, E., Tüzün Özmen, Ö., Tutkun, N. and Köysal, O. 2017. Outdoor performance analysis of different PV panel types. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 651-661.
• Başoğlu, M.E., Kazdaloğlu, A., Erfidan, T. and Bilgin, M.Z. 2015. Performance analyzes of different photovoltaic module technologies under İzmit, Kocaeli climatic conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 357-365.
• Kacira, M., Şimşek, M., Babur, Y. and Demirkol, S. 2004. Determining optimum tilt angles and orientations of photovoltaic panels in Sanliurfa, Turkey. Renewable Energy, 29(8), 1265-1275.
• Hussein, H.M.S., Ahmad, G.E. and El-Ghetany, H.H. 2004. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules at different tilt angles and orientations. Energy Conversion and Management, 45(15), 2441-2452.
• Adinoyi, M.J. and Said, S.A.M. 2013. Effect of dust accumulation on the power outputs of solar photovoltaic modules. Renewable Energy, 60, 633-636.
• Zhao, W., Lv, Y., Wei, Z. Yan, W. and Zhou, Q. 2021. Review on dust deposition and cleaning methods for solar PV modules. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 13(3), 032701.
• Karuppu, K. and Sitaraman, V. Solar assessment guidance: A guide for solar trainee, trainer & assessor examination, First edition, Notion Press, Indian, 2019.
• SunCalc.org, 2021. https://www.suncalc.org/ . (23 June 2021).
• Zaraket, J., Aillerie, M. and Salame, C. 2017. Capacitance evolution of PV solar modules under thermal stress. Energy Procedia, 119, 702-708.
• Orosz, M., Zweibaum, N., Lance, T., Ruiz, M. and Morad, R. 2016. Spectrum-splitting hybrid CSP-CPV solar energy system with standalone and parabolic trough plant retrofit applications. AIP Conference Proceedings, 13-16 October, 1734(1), Cape Town, South Africa, 070023.