SCARCE WAYS: PROCESSES OF SOCIAL PRODUCTION AND REPRODUCTION IN THE MINIMUM INCOME

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 31 - 38, 01.12.2010

Eduardo Vítor Rodrıgues

Abstract

Portugal established in 1996 the Guaranteed Minimum Income (Law Nº 19-A/96), defined as an
instrument of social policy with two components: 1) the financial provision to the poor and 2) a
socio-professional insertion program for beneficiaries and their households. It is, therefore,
fundamental to study and evaluate the impacts and structural constraints that this politics has
caused, in the context of a weak Portuguese welfare state, seeking to understand the relationships
between the objectives detailed in the law and actual practices in its application. We focus the
analysis on beneficiaries, their characteristics and their ways of live, as well as in institutional
practices and in their organizational models.
But this analysis also requires the study of the factors and processes of vulnerability that tend to
perpetuate themselves and remain in the beneficiary populations and the analysis of the forms and
models of institutional intervention. It is pertinent to consider whether the policies of integration
have or not a unifying role. This will mean that the logic of integration can act as a leveling
factor, standardizing practices and social representations as the effect of institutional functioning.
Or, rather, the analysis of social practices, ideas and value systems of the beneficiaries and
professional actors will distinguish conflicts and oppositions, giving rise to groups that manage
the paradoxes of integration policies from different resources. Still, the weakening of the
structures, the multiplicity of partners and specific initiatives can be important obstacles, as
important as most people hardly know the bureaucratic and administrative channels.
This study is held in the empirical area of Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto, Portugal.

Keywords

inclusion, social policy

References

• Almeida, João Ferreira de (1992), Exclusão Social: Factores e Tipos de Pobreza em Portugal, Oeiras: Celta.
• Amable, Bruno (2005), Les cinq capitalismes, Paris : Ed. du Seuil.
• Amaral, João Ferreira (coord.) (1998), Europa Social, Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
• Amin, Samir (1995), La Gestion Capitaliste de la Crise, Paris : Harmattan.
• Bauman, Zygmunt (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), La Misère du Monde, Paris : Ed. du Seuil.
• Capucha, Luís (2005), Desafios da Pobreza, Oeiras: Celta.
• Capucha, Luís (coord.) (1998), Rendimento Mínimo Garantido: Avaliação da Fase Experimental, s/l: Departamento de Estudos, Prospectiva e Planeamento do Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade.
• Castel, Robert (2003), L’Insécurité Social, Paris : Ed. du Seuil.
• Castel, Robert (2001), Propriété Privée, Propriété Sociale, Propriété de Soi, Paris : Fayard.
• Costa, Alfredo Bruto da (2001), Exclusões Sociais, Lisboa: Fundação Mário Soares e Gradiva, 2.ª edição.
• Dubet, François (2002), Le déclin de l’institution, Paris : Ed. du Seuil.
• Fernandes, António Teixeira (1997a), A Sociedade e o Estado, Porto: Afrontamento.
• Habermas, Jürgen (1976), Legitimation crisis, Londres: Heinemann.
• LOPES, João Teixeira (1996), Tristes Escolas: Práticas culturais estudantis no espaço escolar urbano, Porto: Afrontamento.
• Mishra, Ramesh (1990), O Estado-Providência na Sociedade Capitalista, Oeiras: Celta.
• Mozzicafreddo, Juan (2000), Estado-Providência e Cidadania em Portugal, Oeiras: Celta.
• Offe, Claus (1985), Disorganized Capitalism, Oxford: Polity Press.
• Paugam, Serge (2005b), Les formes élémentaires de la pauvreté, Paris : PUF.
• Paugam, Serge (2000), Le Salarié de la Précarité, Paris : PUF.
• Polanyi, Karl (1983), La Grande Transformation, Paris : Gallemard.
• Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor (2010), Escassos Caminhos, Porto: Ed. Afrontamento.
• Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor (2002), “Factores e mecanismos de vulnerabilidade social” in António
• Teixeira Fernandes (coord.), A Inserção Social: Percursos e Desvios de um Processo, Ministério das Cidades, Ordenamento do Território e Ambiente, Porto: CCRN, pp. 11-103. Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor (2000), “O Estado-Providência e os processos de exclusão social: considerações teóricas e estatísticas em torno do caso português”, in Sociologia, n.º 10, pp. 173
• Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor et al. (1999a), “A pobreza e a exclusão social: teorias, conceitos e políticas sociais em Portugal”, in Sociologia, n.º 9, pp. 63-101.
• Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor et al. (1999b), “Políticas sociais e exclusão em Portugal”, in Sociologia
• Problemas e Práticas, n.º 31, pp. 39-64. Rodrigues, Maria João (2004), A Agenda Económica e Social da União Europeia, Lisboa: Dom Quixote.
• Rodrigues, Maria João (1996), O sistema de emprego em Portugal, Lisboa: Dom Quixote.
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (1998), O Estado-Providência em Portugal: entre Globalizações
• Conflituantes, Coimbra: CES. Schnapper, Dominique (1998), Contra o fim do trabalho, Lisboa: Terramar.
• Stiglitz, Joseph (2002), La Grande Désillusion, Paris : Fayard.
• Townsend, Peter (1993), The International Analysis of Poverty, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Townsend, Peter (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living, London: Penguin Books.
• Vasconcelos, Leonor (2005), “Dinâmica de rendimentos, persistência da pobreza e políticas sociais em Portugal”, in Sociedade e Trabalho, n.º 26, Lisboa: DGEEP.
• Xiberras, Martine (1993), Les Théories de L’Exclusion, Paris : Méridiens Klincksieck.