Conference Paper
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: Özel Sayı 1, 145 - 161, 13.11.2020

Abstract

References

  • Abdul, M., Ismail, H., & Jaafar, N. I. H. (2010). Job satisfaction among executives: Case of Japanese electrical and electronic manufacturing companies, Malaysia. Journal of Global Business Management, 6(2), 1.
  • Aggarwal, R. and A. Samwick (1998), “The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation,” Dartmouth College.
  • Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2000). Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46(4), 530-547.
  • Ashley, A. S., & Yang, S. S. (2004). Executive compensation and earnings persistence. Journal of business ethics, 50(4), 369-382.
  • Attaway, M. C. (2000). A study of the relationship between company performance and CEO compensation. American business review, 18(1), 77.
  • Balsam, S., & Ryan, D. H. (2007). Limiting executive compensation: The case of CEOs hired after the imposition of 162 (m). Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(4), 599-621.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Jackson Jr, R. J. (2005). Executive pensions (No. w11907). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2009). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. The review of financial studies, 23(3), 939-961.
  • Bengtsson, O., & Hand, J. R. (2011). CEO compensation in venture-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 391-411.
  • Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
  • Blackwell, D. W., Dudney, D. M., & Farrell, K. A. (2007). Changes in CEO compensation structure and the impact on firm performance following CEO turnover. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 29(3), 315-338.
  • Brickley, J. A., Bhagat, S., & Lease, R. C. (1985). The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth. Journal of accounting and economics, 7(1-3), 115-129.
  • Carpenter, J. N., & Remmers, B. (2001). Executive stock option exercises and inside information. The Journal of Business, 74(4), 513-534.
  • Chalmers, K., Koh, P. S., & Stapledon, G. (2006). The determinants of CEO compensation: Rent extraction or labour demand?. The british accounting review, 38(3), 259-275.
  • Chance, D. M., Kumar, R., & Todd, R. B. (2000). Therepricing’of executive stock options. Journal of financial economics, 57(1), 129-154.
  • Chauvin, K. W., & Shenoy, C. (2001). Stock price decreases prior to executive stock option grants. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(1), 53-76.
  • Clifford, C. P., & Lindsey, L. A. (2016). Blockholder heterogeneity, CEO compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(5), 1491-1520.
  • Cohen, R. B., Hall, B. J., & Viceira, L. M. (2000). Do executive stock options encourage risk-taking. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
  • Cordeiro, J. J., & Veliyath, R. (2003). Beyond pay for performance: A panel study of the determinants of CEO compensation. American Business Review, 21(1), 56.
  • Core, J. E., & Guay, W. R. (2001). Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of financial economics, 61(2), 253-287.
  • De Angelis, D., & Grinstein, Y. (2012). Pay for the right performance. Johnson School Research Paper Series, (03-2011).
  • De Angelis, D., & Grinstein, Y. (2015). Performance terms in CEO compensation contracts. Review of Finance, 19(2), 619-651.
  • Devers, C. E., Cannella Jr, A. A., Reilly, G. P., & Yoder, M. E. (2007). Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of management, 33(6), 1016-1072.
  • Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 513-534.
  • Engellandt, A., & Riphahn, R. (2004). Incentive Effects of Bonus Payments: Evidence from a Multinational Company. Discussion Paper, University of Basel.
  • Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Corporate performance and CEO compensation in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(4), 693-714.
  • Frydman, C., & Jenter, D. (2010). CEO compensation. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 2(1), 75-102.
  • Frydman, C., & Saks, R. E. (2010). Executive compensation: A new view from a long-term perspective, 1936–2005. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 2099-2138.
  • Garen, J. E. (1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1175-1199.
  • Gervais, S., Heaton, J. B., & Odean, T. (2011). Overconfidence, compensation contracts, and capital budgeting. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1735-1777.
  • Grasselli, M., & Henderson, V. (2009). Risk aversion and block exercise of executive stock options. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(1), 109-127.
  • Grinstein, Y., & Hribar, P. (2004). CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses. Journal of financial economics, 73(1), 119-143.
  • Guay, W., Kothari, S. P., & Sloan, R. (2003). Accounting for employee stock options. American Economic Review, 93(2), 405-409.
  • Gupta, N., Conroy, S. A., & Delery, J. E. (2012). The many faces of pay variation. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 100-115.
  • Guthrie, K., Sokolowsky, J., & Wan, K. M. (2012). CEO compensation and board structure revisited. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1149-1168.
  • Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1997). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?. No. w6213.
  • Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2002). Stock options for undiversified executives. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(1), 3-42.
  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management, 101-112.
  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature (No. w8161). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hite, G. L., & Long, M. S. (1982). Taxes and executive stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 4(1), 3-14.
  • Jensen, M. and B. Barry (1991). “Gordon Cain and the Sterling Group (A).” HBS Case 9- 492-021.
  • Jensen, A. M., Chiu, S., & Murphy, S. (1993). Astrocyte networks. Astrocytes: pharmacology and function, 309, 329.
  • Kaplan, S. N. (2012). Executive compensation and corporate governance in the US: perceptions, facts and challenges (No. w18395). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lam, S. S., & Chng, B. F. (2006). Do executive stock option grants have value implications for firm performance?. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 26(3), 249-274.
  • Lee, J. (2009). Executive performance-based remuneration, performance change and board structures. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(2), 138-162.
  • Low, A. (2009). Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(3), 470-490.
  • Mahoney, L. S., & Thorn, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149-162.
  • Martin, K. J., & Thomas, R. S. (2005). When is enough, enough? Market reaction to highly dilutive stock option plans and the subsequent impact on CEO compensation. Journal of corporate finance, 11(1-2), 61-83.
  • Matolcsy, Z., Shan, Y., & Seethamraju, V. (2012). The timing of changes in CEO compensation from cash bonus to equity-based compensation: Determinants and performance consequences. Journal of contemporary accounting & economics, 8(2), 78-91.
  • Matolcsy, Z., & Wright, A. (2011). CEO compensation structure and firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 51(3), 745-763.
  • McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
  • McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341-359.
  • Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 38(2), 163-184.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2002). Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. U. Chi. l. reV., 69, 847.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2003). Stock-based pay in new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-3), 129-147.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2013). Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 211-356). Elsevier.
  • Murphy, K. J., & Oyer, P. (2001). Discretion in executive incentive contracts: Theory and evidence. Available at SSRN 294829.
  • Nguyen, B. D., & Nielsen, K. M. (2014). What death can tell: Are executives paid for their contributions to firm value?. Management Science, 60(12), 2994-3010.
  • Nourayi, M. M., & Daroca, F. P. (2008). CEO compensation, firm performance and operational characteristics. Managerial Finance.
  • O'Connell, V., & O'Sullivan, D. (2014). The influence of lead indicator strength on the use of nonfinancial measures in performance management: Evidence from CEO compensation schemes. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 826-844.
  • Ortiz-Molina, H. (2007). Executive compensation and capital structure: The effects of convertible debt and straight debt on CEO pay. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(1), 69-93.
  • Oyer, P., & Schaefer, S. (2006). Costs of broad-based stock option plans. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15(4), 511-534.
  • Pendiuc, T., & Lis, E. C. (2013). Perceptions of executive payment abuse in public institutions. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 7, 39.
  • Perry, T., & Zenner, M. (2001). Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 453-488.
  • Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2009). Management fashion pay-for-performance for CEOs. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61(2), 119-149.
  • Ryan Jr, H. E., & Wiggins III, R. A. (2001). The influence of firm-and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 101-123.
  • Sanders, W. G. (2001). Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 477-492.
  • Shao, P., Liu, L., & Kong, A. G. (2008). Analysis on the Sensitive Factors between Executive Officer’s Payment and Corporate Performance [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 1, 94-105.
  • Sigler, K. J. (2011). CEO compensation and company performance. Business and Economics Journal, 31(1), 1-8.
  • Stabile, S. J. (1999). Motivating executives: Does performance-based compensation positively affect managerial performance. U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L., 2, 227.
  • Tian, J. J. (2014). Board monitoring and endogenous information asymmetry. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 136-151.
  • Tiley, J., & Loutzenhiser, G. (2012). Revenue Law: Introduction to UK tax law; Income tax; Capital gains tax; Inheritance tax. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Vafeas, N., & Waegelein, J. F. (2007). The association between audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 241-255.
  • Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960-976.
  • Yermack, D. (2006). Flights of fancy: Corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns. Journal of financial economics, 80(1), 211-242.

YÜKSEK DÜZEY YÖNETİCİLERİN ÖDENEKLERİ VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: Özel Sayı 1, 145 - 161, 13.11.2020

Abstract

Birçok araştırmanın konusunun özellikle yüksek düzey yönetici ödenekleri ile ilgili yapılması ve akademi çevresinin genelde alt düzey yöneticilerden çok yüksek düzey yöneticilere odaklanmasının iki temel nedeni bulunmaktadır. Bunlardan birincisi; yüksek düzey yönetici ödeneklerinin veritabanın diğer yöneticilerin ödeneklerine oranla daha ulaşılabilir olması ve daha gerçekçi ve güncel verileri barındırmasıdır. Araştırmacıların yüksek düzey yöneticilere odaklanmasının ikinci temel nedeni ise; karar verici olarak bir firma da şirket sahibinden sonra en çok yüksek düzey yöneticilerin söz sahibi olmalarıdır. Dolayısıyla, yüksek düzey yönetici bir firmanın bütün kararları üzerinde en etkili kişidir. Çok bölümlü örgüt yapılarında yüksek düzey yöneticiler kendi endüstrilerindeki yatırım fırsatlarını araştırmak ve iş düzeyinde stratejiler geliştirmek gibi önemli sorumluluklara sahiptirler ve bu durum onların performanslarının şirket performansı ve başarısı üzerinde ne kadar etkili olduğunu kanıtlar niteliktedir.
Bu çalışmada; yüksek düzey yönetici ödenek düzeyi ve yapısının başka bir deyişle, ücret ve teşvik sistemlerinin çok birimli firmaların performansı ile ilişkisi incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, çalışmada ödenekler kısa ve uzun vadeli olmak üzere sınıflandırılmıştır. Aktif karlılığı verileri çok birimli firma raporlarından alınarak elde edilen yüksek düzey yönetici ödenek bilgileri ile yapılan araştırmaların incelenmesinden sonra, yüksek düzey yöneticilere hisse bazında uzun vadeli ödenek ve teşviklerin sağlanması gerekliliği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

References

  • Abdul, M., Ismail, H., & Jaafar, N. I. H. (2010). Job satisfaction among executives: Case of Japanese electrical and electronic manufacturing companies, Malaysia. Journal of Global Business Management, 6(2), 1.
  • Aggarwal, R. and A. Samwick (1998), “The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation,” Dartmouth College.
  • Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2000). Executive compensation in the information technology industry. Management Science, 46(4), 530-547.
  • Ashley, A. S., & Yang, S. S. (2004). Executive compensation and earnings persistence. Journal of business ethics, 50(4), 369-382.
  • Attaway, M. C. (2000). A study of the relationship between company performance and CEO compensation. American business review, 18(1), 77.
  • Balsam, S., & Ryan, D. H. (2007). Limiting executive compensation: The case of CEOs hired after the imposition of 162 (m). Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22(4), 599-621.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Jackson Jr, R. J. (2005). Executive pensions (No. w11907). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2009). Pay without performance: The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. The review of financial studies, 23(3), 939-961.
  • Bengtsson, O., & Hand, J. R. (2011). CEO compensation in venture-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 391-411.
  • Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
  • Blackwell, D. W., Dudney, D. M., & Farrell, K. A. (2007). Changes in CEO compensation structure and the impact on firm performance following CEO turnover. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 29(3), 315-338.
  • Brickley, J. A., Bhagat, S., & Lease, R. C. (1985). The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth. Journal of accounting and economics, 7(1-3), 115-129.
  • Carpenter, J. N., & Remmers, B. (2001). Executive stock option exercises and inside information. The Journal of Business, 74(4), 513-534.
  • Chalmers, K., Koh, P. S., & Stapledon, G. (2006). The determinants of CEO compensation: Rent extraction or labour demand?. The british accounting review, 38(3), 259-275.
  • Chance, D. M., Kumar, R., & Todd, R. B. (2000). Therepricing’of executive stock options. Journal of financial economics, 57(1), 129-154.
  • Chauvin, K. W., & Shenoy, C. (2001). Stock price decreases prior to executive stock option grants. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(1), 53-76.
  • Clifford, C. P., & Lindsey, L. A. (2016). Blockholder heterogeneity, CEO compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(5), 1491-1520.
  • Cohen, R. B., Hall, B. J., & Viceira, L. M. (2000). Do executive stock options encourage risk-taking. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
  • Cordeiro, J. J., & Veliyath, R. (2003). Beyond pay for performance: A panel study of the determinants of CEO compensation. American Business Review, 21(1), 56.
  • Core, J. E., & Guay, W. R. (2001). Stock option plans for non-executive employees. Journal of financial economics, 61(2), 253-287.
  • De Angelis, D., & Grinstein, Y. (2012). Pay for the right performance. Johnson School Research Paper Series, (03-2011).
  • De Angelis, D., & Grinstein, Y. (2015). Performance terms in CEO compensation contracts. Review of Finance, 19(2), 619-651.
  • Devers, C. E., Cannella Jr, A. A., Reilly, G. P., & Yoder, M. E. (2007). Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of management, 33(6), 1016-1072.
  • Eisenmann, T. R. (2002). The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6), 513-534.
  • Engellandt, A., & Riphahn, R. (2004). Incentive Effects of Bonus Payments: Evidence from a Multinational Company. Discussion Paper, University of Basel.
  • Firth, M., Fung, P. M., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Corporate performance and CEO compensation in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(4), 693-714.
  • Frydman, C., & Jenter, D. (2010). CEO compensation. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 2(1), 75-102.
  • Frydman, C., & Saks, R. E. (2010). Executive compensation: A new view from a long-term perspective, 1936–2005. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(5), 2099-2138.
  • Garen, J. E. (1994). Executive compensation and principal-agent theory. Journal of political economy, 102(6), 1175-1199.
  • Gervais, S., Heaton, J. B., & Odean, T. (2011). Overconfidence, compensation contracts, and capital budgeting. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1735-1777.
  • Grasselli, M., & Henderson, V. (2009). Risk aversion and block exercise of executive stock options. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33(1), 109-127.
  • Grinstein, Y., & Hribar, P. (2004). CEO compensation and incentives: Evidence from M&A bonuses. Journal of financial economics, 73(1), 119-143.
  • Guay, W., Kothari, S. P., & Sloan, R. (2003). Accounting for employee stock options. American Economic Review, 93(2), 405-409.
  • Gupta, N., Conroy, S. A., & Delery, J. E. (2012). The many faces of pay variation. Human Resource Management Review, 22(2), 100-115.
  • Guthrie, K., Sokolowsky, J., & Wan, K. M. (2012). CEO compensation and board structure revisited. The Journal of Finance, 67(3), 1149-1168.
  • Hall, B. J., & Liebman, J. B. (1997). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?. No. w6213.
  • Hall, B. J., & Murphy, K. J. (2002). Stock options for undiversified executives. Journal of accounting and economics, 33(1), 3-42.
  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management, 101-112.
  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2001). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature (No. w8161). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hite, G. L., & Long, M. S. (1982). Taxes and executive stock options. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 4(1), 3-14.
  • Jensen, M. and B. Barry (1991). “Gordon Cain and the Sterling Group (A).” HBS Case 9- 492-021.
  • Jensen, A. M., Chiu, S., & Murphy, S. (1993). Astrocyte networks. Astrocytes: pharmacology and function, 309, 329.
  • Kaplan, S. N. (2012). Executive compensation and corporate governance in the US: perceptions, facts and challenges (No. w18395). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lam, S. S., & Chng, B. F. (2006). Do executive stock option grants have value implications for firm performance?. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 26(3), 249-274.
  • Lee, J. (2009). Executive performance-based remuneration, performance change and board structures. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(2), 138-162.
  • Low, A. (2009). Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(3), 470-490.
  • Mahoney, L. S., & Thorn, L. (2006). An examination of the structure of executive compensation and corporate social responsibility: A Canadian investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149-162.
  • Martin, K. J., & Thomas, R. S. (2005). When is enough, enough? Market reaction to highly dilutive stock option plans and the subsequent impact on CEO compensation. Journal of corporate finance, 11(1-2), 61-83.
  • Matolcsy, Z., Shan, Y., & Seethamraju, V. (2012). The timing of changes in CEO compensation from cash bonus to equity-based compensation: Determinants and performance consequences. Journal of contemporary accounting & economics, 8(2), 78-91.
  • Matolcsy, Z., & Wright, A. (2011). CEO compensation structure and firm performance. Accounting & Finance, 51(3), 745-763.
  • McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
  • McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341-359.
  • Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 38(2), 163-184.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2002). Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. U. Chi. l. reV., 69, 847.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2003). Stock-based pay in new economy firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 34(1-3), 129-147.
  • Murphy, K. J. (2013). Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 211-356). Elsevier.
  • Murphy, K. J., & Oyer, P. (2001). Discretion in executive incentive contracts: Theory and evidence. Available at SSRN 294829.
  • Nguyen, B. D., & Nielsen, K. M. (2014). What death can tell: Are executives paid for their contributions to firm value?. Management Science, 60(12), 2994-3010.
  • Nourayi, M. M., & Daroca, F. P. (2008). CEO compensation, firm performance and operational characteristics. Managerial Finance.
  • O'Connell, V., & O'Sullivan, D. (2014). The influence of lead indicator strength on the use of nonfinancial measures in performance management: Evidence from CEO compensation schemes. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 826-844.
  • Ortiz-Molina, H. (2007). Executive compensation and capital structure: The effects of convertible debt and straight debt on CEO pay. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(1), 69-93.
  • Oyer, P., & Schaefer, S. (2006). Costs of broad-based stock option plans. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15(4), 511-534.
  • Pendiuc, T., & Lis, E. C. (2013). Perceptions of executive payment abuse in public institutions. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, 7, 39.
  • Perry, T., & Zenner, M. (2001). Pay for performance? Government regulation and the structure of compensation contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 62(3), 453-488.
  • Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2009). Management fashion pay-for-performance for CEOs. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61(2), 119-149.
  • Ryan Jr, H. E., & Wiggins III, R. A. (2001). The influence of firm-and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 101-123.
  • Sanders, W. G. (2001). Behavioral responses of CEOs to stock ownership and stock option pay. Academy of Management journal, 44(3), 477-492.
  • Shao, P., Liu, L., & Kong, A. G. (2008). Analysis on the Sensitive Factors between Executive Officer’s Payment and Corporate Performance [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 1, 94-105.
  • Sigler, K. J. (2011). CEO compensation and company performance. Business and Economics Journal, 31(1), 1-8.
  • Stabile, S. J. (1999). Motivating executives: Does performance-based compensation positively affect managerial performance. U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L., 2, 227.
  • Tian, J. J. (2014). Board monitoring and endogenous information asymmetry. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 136-151.
  • Tiley, J., & Loutzenhiser, G. (2012). Revenue Law: Introduction to UK tax law; Income tax; Capital gains tax; Inheritance tax. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Vafeas, N., & Waegelein, J. F. (2007). The association between audit committees, compensation incentives, and corporate audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 28(3), 241-255.
  • Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, agents, and the founder discount: Executive compensation in new ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 960-976.
  • Yermack, D. (2006). Flights of fancy: Corporate jets, CEO perquisites, and inferior shareholder returns. Journal of financial economics, 80(1), 211-242.
There are 76 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Duygu Hıdıroğlu 0000-0003-2647-8750

Publication Date November 13, 2020
Submission Date July 8, 2020
Acceptance Date September 16, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 4 Issue: Özel Sayı 1

Cite

APA Hıdıroğlu, D. (2020). YÜKSEK DÜZEY YÖNETİCİLERİN ÖDENEKLERİ VE FİRMA PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Inquiries, 4(Özel Sayı 1), 145-161.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRoj2RSgFvw8N5CG9ZqLQN5NolsDY6Sm-MbIA&usqp=CAU     road-issn.png   download  logo.png 18351   18352       18353    18354  18355     18356    18357     18358


email_ss_1920.png

Journal EMI e-mail Adresi: internationaljournalemi@gmail.com

JOURNAL EMI Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.