Developing Appreciative Literature Textbook Based on ThematicIntegrative Through Active Learning

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 395 - 402, 01.07.2019

Endang Sri Markamah St. Y. Slamet Rukayah . Retno Winarni

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573897

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The objectives of this research were: (1) to describe students’ and lecturers’ needs on poetry and
drama appreciative textbook, (2) to describe the development of textbook model (3) to find the
effectiveness of textbook model 4) to describe textbook dissemination. The type of research used was
research and development. Research was done through 4 stages: (1) exploration, (2) model
development, (3) model testing, (4) dissemination. Exploration stage used qualitative descriptive
approach. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, and
questionnaires. Data analysis technique was interactive analysis model. Model testing was done
through experimental research. The results of this research were: (1) the exploration stage showed
that the poetry and drama learning textbook used by Elementary Teacher Education Program (ETEP)
students in Surakarta did not meet the students’ and lecturers’ need, (2) model development stage
produced appreciative poetry and drama textbook through preliminary field testing; (3) model
testing phase was to test effectiveness of the textbook used t-test non-independent technique. It was
obtained tobtain of 23 and ttable(90; 0.05) of 1.67. Thus, tobtained (23) > ttable (1.67) which meant
that the hypothesis was accepted (Ho was rejected). In conclusion, the Apprec iative Poetry and
Drama textbook model was effectively improve students' poetry and drama appreciation skills.
Dissemination was done through national seminars, article writing in international journals, as well
as the publishing of an Integrative-thematic Textbook of Poetry and Drama Learning with ISBN.

Keywords

Textbook, poetry and drama, appreciative, thematic-integrative, active learning

References

• Borg, W. R. dan Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An Introduction. New York: Longman. Cherney, I. D. (2008). The effects of active learning on student’ memories for course content. Journal of Active Learning in Higher Education, Volume 9, No. 2. pp. 152-171. http//alh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/9/2/152. Cohen, L. et al. (2000). Research method in education. Great Briatin: TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall. Gani, E. (2003). Efektifitas Pengajaran Menulis. Dalam http://www.ialf.edu.html. Diunduh pada tanggal 24 Mei 2018. Gul, E. & Gucum, E.B. (2014). Creative drama appreciation as complementary for constructivist approaches for science sources: Teacher and student’s evaluation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science No.174 pg 2043-2050. Elsevier ScienceDirect. Lorenzen, M. (2001). Active learning and library ınstruction (online) dalam http://www.libraryinstruction.com/link.html. Meyers, Chet & Jones, Thomas B. (1993). Promoting active learning. Jossey-Bass Publisher: San Fransisco. Miles, M. B. dan Huberman, A. Michael. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. (terj. Tjetjeo Rohendi Rohidi)). Jakarta: universitas Indonesia. Moody, H.L.B. (1971). The teaching of literature. London: Longman. Mustakim, A. W. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Nordin A.N., et.al. (2012). Fulfilling the task of reading, writing, speaking and listening through drama workshop. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science No. 66 pg. 196-202. Elsevier ScienceDirect. Nurhidayati (2011). Pembelajaran menyimak apresiasif cerita pendek dengan strategi belajar kooperatif. Litera. 10. (1): 87-99. Nurkamto, Joko. (2012). Struktur Penelitian danPenulisan R & D Bidang Pendidikan (Versi Borg dan Gall). Makalah Kuliah Umum Program Pascasarjana IKIP PGRI Madiun : 30 September 2012. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work: a review of the recearch. Journal Engr. Education, 93 (3): 223- 2231. Deparment of Chemical Engineering Bucknell University. Richard, JC & Rodgers T. (2002). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Silberman, M. (2006). Active Learning; 101 Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Terj. Sarjuli, et al. Yogyakarta: YAPPENDIS. Sugiyono (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Supriadi, D. (2007). Kreativitas, Kebudayaan, dan Perkembangan Iptek. Bandung: CV Alfabeta Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Sebelas Maret Univercity Press. Toivanen, T., Komulainen, K., Ruismaki, & Heikki. (2011). Drama education and improvisation as a resource of teacher students’s creativity. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science No. 12 pg. 60-69. Elsevier ScienceDirect. Tomlinson,B. & Masuhara (Eds). (2004). Developing language course materials. Singapore: RELC Portfolio Series. Wiersma, W. (1986). Research methods in education: An ıntroduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.