Literature Learning: Pragmatic Study of Humor Discourse in Indonesian Political Humor Book

Year 2019, Volume: 4 , 680 - 690, 01.12.2019

Santi Wahyufi Diningsih Andayani . Muhammad Rohmadi

https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628514

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The use of discourse as a medium for conveying messages to the community has been carried out in various fields. Discourse for criticism, suggestions, or satire is often conveyed in with humorous attributes to make it more interesting. This study aims to analyze the pragmatic aspects of humor discourse in the "Humor Politik Indonesia (Indonesian Political Humor)‛ book. The qualitative approach and descriptive methods were used in this study. The results of the analysis showed that the pragmatic aspects contained in the book were in the form of presuppositions and implicature aspects. The presupposition aspect includes lexical, counterfactual, structural presuppositions. For the implicature aspect is in the form of mockery and satirical forms of implicatures. These results prove that the pragmatic aspects used in humor discourseare discourse constructors to create funny effects for readers. It can be implied that the political humor discourse that contains aspects of pragmatics can be used as teaching materials in learning Indonesian in senior high schools. This relates to BasicCompetence to evaluate the anecdotal test of the implicit meaning aspect that students must have

Keywords

Humor Book, Descriptive, Language Game, Pragmatic, Discourse

References

• Adjei, S. B. (2013). Discourse analysis:Examining language use in context. The Qualitative Report, 18(50), 1–10.Alduais, A. M. S. (2015). An account of phonetics and phonology as similar identical or different.The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(1), 157–165.Alvermann, D. E. (2009). Teaching preservice teachers to read the discourse of school reform. Pedagogies: An Andrason, A. (2014). Language complexity:An insight from complex-system theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140202.15Ardiansyah, R , ., S , ., T . (2018). Inheritance national culture through learning in elementary school at disruptive era: Case study in Surakarta Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3 (4), 48-53. DOI:10.24331/ijere.427917Bell, N. D. (2009). Learning about and through humor in the second language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809104697Berge, M. (2017). The role of humor in learning physics: Astudy of undergraduate students. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9508-4Bergen, D. (2012). Teaching strategies: Using humor to facilitate learning. Childhood Education, 69(2), 105–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1992.10520903Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic nature of presupposition in american and persian newspaper editorials.International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v3i1.554Bryant, L., Spencer, E.& Ferguson, A. (2016). Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia of language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 00(00), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1239013Chauvet, S., & Hofmeyer, A. (2007). Humor asa facilitative style in problem-based learning environments for nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 27(4), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.05.008Councilor, K. C. (2017). Communication and critical / cultural studies feeding the body politic: metaphors of digestion in Progressive Era US immigration discourse. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2016.1274044Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research(Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Darsono, Winarno, & Slamet. (2018). The need textbook writing of children’s story based on character education. International Journalof Educational Research Review, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.391780Devianty, R. (2017). Bahasa Sebagai Cermin Kebudayaan. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 24(2), 226–245.Dixon, P. N., Strano, D. A., Willingham, W., & Chandler, C. K. (2011). Sense of humor as a mediator during incidental learning of humor-related material. Psychological Reports, 64(3), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.851Ekdale, B. (2014). Slum discourse,media representations and maisha mtaani in Kibera, Kenya. African Journalism Studies, 35(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2014.886277Fisher, M. S. (1997). The effect of humor on learning in a planetarium. Science Education, 81(6), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199711)81:6<703:AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-MGerald Gazdar. (1979). Pragmatic implicature, preassuppasition and logical form. England: Academic Press.Gorham, J., & Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship of teachers’ use of humor in the classroom to immediacy and student learning. Communication Education, 39(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378786Gridina, N. (2016). Exploring meaning: verb semantics and quality. Journal of Language & Education, 2(3), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2016-2-3-45-53Gromov, V. A., & Migrina, A. M. (2017). A language as a self-organized critical system. Wiley Hindawi, (2), 1. Hassan, B. A. (2013). The pragmatics of humor: January 25th Revolution and Occupy Wall Street. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n2p551Hauck, W. E., & Thomas, J. W. (1972). The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 40(4), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1972.11011352Krüger, F. (2016). Discourse ethics and the media. AF, 37(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2015.1129503Liang, R., & Liu, Y. (2016). An analysis of presupposition triggers inHilary Clinton’s first campaign speech. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 68. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n5p68Markamah, E. S., Slamet, Rukayah, & Winarni, R. (2019). Developing appreciative literature textbook based on thematicintegrative through active learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573897Mata-mcmahon, J. (2017). Spirituality and humour: Making connections for early childhood education. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 22(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2017.1287681Mihalcea, R., & Strapparava, C. (2006). Learning to laugh (automatically): Computational models for humor recognition. Computational Intelligence, 22(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.2006.00278.xOktoma, E., & Mardiyono, S. (2013). The analysis of presupposition in the short stories of silvester goridus sukur. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(1), 1–11.Oualif, M. (2017). Presupposition: A semantic or pragmatic phenomenon? Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3.4Puri, A. D. (2019). Analysis of Humor on Cartoon Comics ‚Be Like Bro‛: Pragmatics Study. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 1(1), 13–22.Rachman, I. F., Andayani, & Suyitno. (2019). Cultural Issues in Indonesian Language Learning for Foreign Speakers. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 454–460. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573951Rijt, J. Van, Swart, P. De, & Coppen, P. (2018). Research papers in education linguistic concepts in L1 grammar education: A systematic literature review. Research Papers in Education, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1493742Rossing, J. P. (2016). American humor studies association a sense of humor for civic life toward a strong defense of humor. Stddies in American Humor, 2(1), 1–21.Sabao, C. (2016). Arguments for an appraisal linguistic discourse approach to the analysis of ‘objectivity’ in ‘hard’ news reports arguments for an appraisal linguistic discourse approach to the analysis of ‘objectivity’ in ‘hard’ news reports. African Journalism Studies, 37(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2015.1095776Sakaeva, L. R., Martynova, E. V, Salyahova, G. I., Sadekova, A. H., Khanipova, I., & Studies, O. (2017). Sociolinguistics features of humor in american linguoculture. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(7), 1224–1230.Santana, C. (2016). What is language? Journal of Philosophy, 3(19), 501–523.Shively, R. L. (2013). Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12043.xSiddiqui, A. (2018). The principle features of English pragmaticsin applied linguistics. Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN:9(2), 77–80.Sinkeviciute, V. (2014). ‚When a joke’s a joke and when it’s too much‛: Mateship as a key to interpreting jocular FTAs in Australian English. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 121–139. Taverniers, M. (2011). The syntax–semantics interface in systemic functional grammar: Halliday’s interpretation of the Hjelmslevian model of stratification. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(4), 1100–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.003Thorogood, J. (2016). Satire andgeopolitics: vulgarity, ambiguity and the body grotesque in south park. Geopolitics, 21(1), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1089433Ulrich, T. A., & Jr., D. M. T. (2018). Free voluntary reading: A neglected strategy for language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 28(2), 25–48.Umar Nadeem, M , Mohammed, R , Dalib, S . (2018). An overview of dominant research approaches to measure intercultural communication competence(ICC). International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3 (4), 141-149. DOI: 10.24331/ijere.455333Verschueren, J. (2017). The pragmatics of humor in a serious story. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante, (31), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.14198/elua2017.31.16Vivona, B. D., & Ed, D. (2014). To laugh or not to laugh: Understandings of the appropriateness of humour and joking in the workplace. European Journal of Humour Research, 2(1), 1–18.Wang, Y. (2014). A short analysis of discourse coherence. Jurnal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.460-465Wanzer, Melissa B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238Wanzer, Melissa Bekelja, & Frymier, A. B. (1999). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning. Communication Education, 48(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379152Wijana, I Putu. (2003). Permainan Bahasa dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Mutu Pengajaran Ilmu Bahasa Indonesia: YogyakartaWitczak-plisiecka, I. (2009). Speech acts and the autonomy of linguistic pragmatics. Loadz Paper in Pragmatics, 5(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10016-009-0008-8Wu, S. R. (2008). Humor and empathy: Developing students’ empathy through teaching robots to tell english jokes. Proceedings -2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, DIGITEL 2008, 213–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/DIGITEL.2008.27Xiang, M., Grove, J., & Giannakidou, A. (2016). Semantic and pragmatic processes in the comprehension of negation:An event related potential study of negative polarity sensitivity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 38, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2015.11.001Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806492