Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?

Year 2019, Volume: 4 , 711 - 718, 01.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the effectiveness of discovery learning and enquiry learning model toward learning outcome in natural science (IPA) subject especially in chapter of plant and its part. This study was conducted on 162 students of 4th grade of elementary school in Kendali Sodo. This is an experimental study with nonequivalent posttest design. Meanwhile the sampling cluster sampling model which use 3 SD. Data analysis result using N-gain score show that mean of experiment class discovery (ecd) was 78,1057, experiment class inquiry (eci) was 76,6121 and control class was 41,7720. Meanwhile the T-test show that experiment class discovery has t value as 6,639 > from T table (1,679), and T-value enquiry class as t 6,506 > from T table (1678). Therefore it can be concluded that the discovery and inquiry models have a significant effect on student learning outcomes. The result also show that the discovery model was the model that had the most significant effect compared to the inquiry modelon student learning outcomes in the natural science lesson, especially plant material and its parts.

References

  • Adirahayu, M., F. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran ınkuırı terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negerı 2 Wonoayu. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo.Ali, M., & Setiani, D., S., (2018). Pengaruh model discoverilearning terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada konsep jamur. Bioedusiana3 (2).Anggraeni, P., Sopandi W., & Widodo A. (2018). Profil pertanyaan inkuiri guru pada pembelajaran ipa di sekolah dasar. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 5 (2).Bahari, N., K., I., Darsana, I., W., Putra, D., K., N., S. (2018). Pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media lingkungan alam sekitar terhadap hasil belajar ipa. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar (PGSD), 2 (2).Barus, E.L. & Sani, R.A. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran latıhan ınkuırı terhadap hasıl belajar sıswa pada materı pokok usaha dan energı dı kelas X semester II. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI)5 (4).Destalina, Ali, M., S., & Palloan, P. (2019). The effectıvıty of dıscovery learnıng applıcatıon ın ınquıryorıented scıence learnıng towards understandıng the concept of physıcs of students in grade XI IPA SMAN 13 Makassar. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 15(1), 1-7.Duman,T. & Karagoz,S. (2016).An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries.International Journal of Educational Research Review , 1(1), 1-13.Ellizar, E., Hardeli, H., Beltris, S., & Suharni, R. (2018). Development of scientific approach based on discoverilearning module. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Fitzgerald, A., & Smith, K. (2016). Science that matters: exploring science learning and teaching in primary schools. Australian journal of teacher education, 41(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.4.Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. (2018). The teachingof science in primary schools. London: David Fulton PubhliserIrawati,E. & Mustadi,A. (2019). Learning together assisted with of 7-in-1 box: Creating effectiveness of mathematic learning outcomes of elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4 (3), 310-319.Isnardiantini,S., Usodo,B. & Soegiyanto,H. (2019). The effect of discoverilearning –based teaching material by utilizing traditional game on mathematic abilities of the 2nd graders of elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4(3),269 -274.Kaya, İ.(2018).Examination of preschool teachers' opinion on alternative assessment.Universal Journal of Educational Research,6(10), 2294-2299Kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar SD/ MIRahayu, C., & Putriani, D., (2018). The effect of discoverilearning model using sunflowers in circles on mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research1(1)Rangkuti, M., A., & Sani, R., A., (2018). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kritis menyelesaikan masalah fisika pada pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI)6(3)Sari, B., S., K., Jufri, W., A., & Santosa, D., (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPAberbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, (JPPIPA), 5 (2) 2019: 219-227Septya, A., (2018). Implementasi strategi pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA materi penjernihan air sederhana. Universitas Muhamadiyah SidoarjoYohana, I., Sudarmin, S. Wardani, S. & Mohyaddin, S. N. B. (2018). The generic science skill profile of fourth grade students on acid and base topic in guided ınquiry learning model. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 110-116.
Year 2019, Volume: 4 , 711 - 718, 01.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710

Abstract

References

  • Adirahayu, M., F. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran ınkuırı terbimbing terhadap keterampilan proses sains siswa kelas VIII di SMP Negerı 2 Wonoayu. Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo.Ali, M., & Setiani, D., S., (2018). Pengaruh model discoverilearning terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik pada konsep jamur. Bioedusiana3 (2).Anggraeni, P., Sopandi W., & Widodo A. (2018). Profil pertanyaan inkuiri guru pada pembelajaran ipa di sekolah dasar. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 5 (2).Bahari, N., K., I., Darsana, I., W., Putra, D., K., N., S. (2018). Pengaruh model discovery learning berbantuan media lingkungan alam sekitar terhadap hasil belajar ipa. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar (PGSD), 2 (2).Barus, E.L. & Sani, R.A. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran latıhan ınkuırı terhadap hasıl belajar sıswa pada materı pokok usaha dan energı dı kelas X semester II. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI)5 (4).Destalina, Ali, M., S., & Palloan, P. (2019). The effectıvıty of dıscovery learnıng applıcatıon ın ınquıryorıented scıence learnıng towards understandıng the concept of physıcs of students in grade XI IPA SMAN 13 Makassar. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 15(1), 1-7.Duman,T. & Karagoz,S. (2016).An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries.International Journal of Educational Research Review , 1(1), 1-13.Ellizar, E., Hardeli, H., Beltris, S., & Suharni, R. (2018). Development of scientific approach based on discoverilearning module. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Fitzgerald, A., & Smith, K. (2016). Science that matters: exploring science learning and teaching in primary schools. Australian journal of teacher education, 41(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.4.Harlen, W. & Qualter, A. (2018). The teachingof science in primary schools. London: David Fulton PubhliserIrawati,E. & Mustadi,A. (2019). Learning together assisted with of 7-in-1 box: Creating effectiveness of mathematic learning outcomes of elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4 (3), 310-319.Isnardiantini,S., Usodo,B. & Soegiyanto,H. (2019). The effect of discoverilearning –based teaching material by utilizing traditional game on mathematic abilities of the 2nd graders of elementary school. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4(3),269 -274.Kaya, İ.(2018).Examination of preschool teachers' opinion on alternative assessment.Universal Journal of Educational Research,6(10), 2294-2299Kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar SD/ MIRahayu, C., & Putriani, D., (2018). The effect of discoverilearning model using sunflowers in circles on mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research1(1)Rangkuti, M., A., & Sani, R., A., (2018). Analisis kemampuan berfikir kritis menyelesaikan masalah fisika pada pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran inkuiri. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika (INPAFI)6(3)Sari, B., S., K., Jufri, W., A., & Santosa, D., (2019). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPAberbasis inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan literasi sains. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, (JPPIPA), 5 (2) 2019: 219-227Septya, A., (2018). Implementasi strategi pembelajaran inkuiri untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA materi penjernihan air sederhana. Universitas Muhamadiyah SidoarjoYohana, I., Sudarmin, S. Wardani, S. & Mohyaddin, S. N. B. (2018). The generic science skill profile of fourth grade students on acid and base topic in guided ınquiry learning model. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(2), 110-116.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dyah Galih Rizki Wulandarı This is me

Ali Mustadı This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 4

Cite

APA Wulandarı, D. G. R., & Mustadı, A. (2019). Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4, 711-718. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710
AMA Wulandarı DGR, Mustadı A. Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?. IJERE. December 2019;4:711-718. doi:10.24331/ijere.628710
Chicago Wulandarı, Dyah Galih Rizki, and Ali Mustadı. “Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model Is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4, December (December 2019): 711-18. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710.
EndNote Wulandarı DGR, Mustadı A (December 1, 2019) Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 711–718.
IEEE D. G. R. Wulandarı and A. Mustadı, “Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?”, IJERE, vol. 4, pp. 711–718, 2019, doi: 10.24331/ijere.628710.
ISNAD Wulandarı, Dyah Galih Rizki - Mustadı, Ali. “Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model Is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?”. International Journal of Educational Research Review 4 (December 2019), 711-718. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710.
JAMA Wulandarı DGR, Mustadı A. Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?. IJERE. 2019;4:711–718.
MLA Wulandarı, Dyah Galih Rizki and Ali Mustadı. “Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model Is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?”. International Journal of Educational Research Review, vol. 4, 2019, pp. 711-8, doi:10.24331/ijere.628710.
Vancouver Wulandarı DGR, Mustadı A. Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning?. IJERE. 2019;4:711-8.

International Journal of Educational Research Review (ISSN:2458-9322)
International Journal of Educational Research Review publishes scholarly articles that are of general significance to the education research community and that come from a wide range of areas. The International Journal of Educational Research Review aims to provide a forum for scholarly understanding of the field of education. Articles focus upon concepts, research, review and practices that emphasizes the intersections between education research and other fields, raises new questions, and develops innovative approaches to our understandings of pressing issues.
The range of topics covered in the International Journal of Educational Research Review include; read full aims and scope; https://www.ijere.com/page/journal-scopes
Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal will undergo initial editor screening, rigorous double-anonymous peer review, and review by the editorial board.
Double-blind peer review
International Journal of Educational Research Review follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. It is the responsibility of the author to anonymize the manuscript and any associated materials. read full Peer Review Policy; https://www.ijere.com/page/peer-review-policy
Ownership and management
IJERE journal is hosted by Dergipark/Tubitak. IJERE Journal is published with the support of Sakarya University Faculty of Education/TURKEY.
Governing body
Editor in Chief
Dr. Serhat Arslan, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey (serhat.arslan@erbakan.edu.tr)
read full Governing body /Ownership and management/ Editorial board member ; https://www.ijere.com/page/editorial-board
Copyright and licensing
Copyright Statement
Copyright violation is an important, and possibly related, ethical issue. Authors should check their manuscripts for possible breaches of copyright law (e.g., where permissions are needed for quotations, artwork or tables taken from other publications or from other freely available sources on the Internet) and secure the necessary permissions before submission to International Journal of Educational Research Review.
read full Copyright and licensing; https://www.ijere.com/page/copyright-and-licensing-open-access-statement