Examination of Natural Science Laboratory Perception Levels of Students at Primary Education Grade 6 and Their Attitudes Towards Laboratory Practices of Natural Science Course

Year 2011, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 17 - 27, 01.03.2011

Mustafa Doğru Tuna Gençosman Ayşenur Ataalkın

Abstract

Keywords

-

References

• Adesoji, A. F., & Raimi, M. S. (2004). Effects of Enhanced Laboratory Instructional Technique on Senior Secondary Students’ Attitude toward Chemistry in Oyo Township, Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3).
• Akçay, S., Aydoğdu, M., Yıldırım, H. İ., & Şensoy, Ö. (2005). Fen Eğitiminde İlköğretim 6. Sınıflarda Çiçekli Bitkiler Konusunun Öğretiminde Bilgisayar Destekli Öğretimin Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi [The Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction in Flowery Plant Subject in 6th Grade Students in Science Education on the Success of Student]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 13(1), 103-116.
• Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science Laboratory Environment and Academic Performance. Journal of Science Technology Education, 16, 500-506. Alıcıgüzel, İ. (1979). İlk ve Orta Dereceli Okullarda Öğretim. İstanbul: İnkılap ve Aka Press.
• Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Validity and Worth in the Science Curriculum: Learning School Science Outside the Laboratory. The Curriculum Journal. 17(3), 213–228. Büyükkaragöz, S. S. (1997). Program Geliştirme. 2. Baskı. Konya: Kurucular Ofset.
• Chang, H., Quintan, C., & Krajcik, J.S. (2010). The Impact of Designing and Evaluating Molecular Animations on How Well Middle School Students Understand the Particulate Nature of Matter. Science Education, 94(1), 73-94.
• Doğdu, S., & Arslan Z. (1990). Eğitim Teknolojisi Uygulamaları ve Eğitim Araç-Gereçleri. Ankara: Tekışık Web Ofset.
• Erkuş, A. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Sarmalı. Ankara: Seçkin Press. Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender and Grade Level Differences in Science Interest and Participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259.
• Habibe, T. (2006). Lise Kimya Öğretiminde Laboratuar Kullanımına İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri [Student Views on the Laboratory Use in High School Chemistry Education]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 31-43.
• Hançer, A. H., & Yalçın, N. (2007). Fen Eğitiminde Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşıma Dayalı Bilgisayar Destekli Öğrenmenin Bilgisayara Yönelik Tutuma Etkisi [The Effects of Computer Based Learning Based Upon Constructivist Approach in Science Education on Attitudes toward Computer]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 15(2), 549-560.
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
• Horstman, M., Aldiss, S., Richardson, A., & Gibson, A. (2008). Methodological Issues When Using the Draw and Write Technique with Children Aged 6 to 12 Years. Qualitative Health Research, 18(7), 1001-1011.
• Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2000). Fizik Öğretiminde Laboratuar Uygulamalarının Yürütülmesinde Karşılaşılan Güçlükler. Türk Fizik Derneği, 19 th Physics Congress, 26-29 September, Fırat University, Elazığ.
• Klahr, D., & Li, J. (2005). Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and Back. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(2), 217-238.
• Knox, K. L., Moynihan, J. A., & Markowitz, D. G. (2003). Evaluation of Short Term Impact of a High School Summer Science Program on Students’ Perceived Knowledge and Skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(4), 471-478.
• Lunetta, V. N. (1998). The school science laboratory: Historical perspectives and centers for contemporary teaching. In: Fraser, B. J. and Tobin, K. G. (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Markowitz, D. G. (2004). Evaluation of the Long-Term Impact of a University High School Summer Science Program on Students’ Interest and Perceived Abilities in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 395-407.
• Mckee, E., Williamson, M. V., & Ruebush, E. L. (2007). Effects of a Demonstration Laboratory on Student Learning. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 16(5), 395-400.
• Orion, N., Hofstein, A., Tamir, T., & Giddings G. J. (1997). Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing the Learning Environment of Outdoor Science Activities. Science Education, 81(2), 161.
• cy of Hands-On Experimentation and Student Attitudes toward Science: A Statistically Significant Relation. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 15 (3/4), 285-297.
• Osborne, J. (2003). Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
• Oskay Özyalçın, Ö., Erdem, E., & Yılmaz, A. (2009). Kimya Laboratuar Uygulamalarının Öğrencilerin Kimyaya Yönelik Tutum ve Başarılarına Etkisi Üzerine Bir Çalışma [A Study about the Effects of Chemistry Laboratory Applications on Students’ Attitudes toward Chemistry and Achievement]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 8(27), 222-321.
• Ottander, C., & Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory Work: The Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 113-118.
• Özmen, H. (2001). Kimya Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Laboratuar Uygulamalarında Karşılaştıkları Güçlüklerin Tespiti. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://egitim.cukurova.edu.tr/efdergi /makaleler.asp?dosya=185.
• Taşkın Ekici F., Ekici E., & Taşkın S. (2002). Fen Laboratuarlarının İçinde Bulunduğu Durum, V. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 16-18 September, Ankara. Retrieved October 30, 2010, from http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek 5/b_kitabi/PDF/Fen/Bildiri/ t90d.pdf.
• Tsai, C. C. (2003). Taiwanese Science Students’ And Teachers’ Perceptions Of The Laboratory Learning Environments: Exploring Epistemological Gaps. Internatiınal Journal Science Education, 25(7), 847–860.
• Tweedy, M. E., & Hoese W. J. (2005). Diffusion activities in college laboratory manuals. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4), 150-155.
• Uluçınar, Ş., Cansaran, A., & Karaca, A. (2004). Fen Bilimleri Laboratuvar Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluation of Laboratory Studies in Science]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 465-477.
• Yeşilyurt, S. (2005). Biyoloji Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Biyoloji Laboratuar Uygulamalarında Karşılaştıkları Güçlüklerin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(30), 88-96.
• Yeşilyurt, S. (2006). Öğretmen Adayları ve Öğretim Elemanları Gözüyle Genel Biyoloji Lâboratuar Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi [An Investigation on General Biology Laboratory Applications in Terms of The View of Prospective Teachers and Lecturers]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(2), 481- 496.
• Yeşilyurt, M., Kurt, T., & Temur, A. (2005). İlköğretim Fen Laboratuarı İçin Tutum Anketi Geliştirilmesi ve Uygulanması. Pamukkale University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 17, 23-37.