Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 4th Year Special Issue, 131 - 146, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1202458

Abstract

References

  • Aktas, Y. (1994). Working mother and her child. Education as You Live, (36), 7-11.
  • Altunişik, M. B. (2010). Turkey: Arab Perspectives. Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, 1-32.
  • Apaydın, H. (2001); “The Effect of FamilyCommunication on the Child's Religious Development”, Ondokuz Mayıs University. Journal of the Faculty of Theology, pp. 12-13, pp. 319-337.
  • Atalay, T. (2006). “A Study on the Effect of Family Religiousness on the Religiousness of Youth”, Piety Symposium Papers and Negotiations, KURAV Pub., Bursa,
  • Aziz, A. (2014). Research Methods and Techniques in SocialSciences, 9th Edition, Nobel Pub., Ankara,
  • Bilgin, V. (2003). “Popular Culture and Religion: The Changing Face of Religiosity”, Uludağ University. Journal of theFaculty of Theology, P. 1, C. 12, p. 193-214.
  • Bilecik, S. (2015). The effect of religious culture and ethic scourses on religious literacy skills: A research on university students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Necmettin Erbakan University.
  • Cirhinlioğlu, F. G. and Ok, Ü. (2011) “Are Women or Men More Religious?”, Zeitschriftfürdie Welt der Türken Journal of World of Turks, , P.1, C. 3, pp. 121-141.
  • Demirtas, H. & Ozer, N. (2007). “The Relationship Between Time Management Skills and Academic Achievement of Teacher Candidates”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Strategic Research in Education, P.1, C.2, pp. 34-47.
  • Koç, A. (2014); "Religious Education in Qur'an Courses", Religious Education (Ed. Mustafa Köylü and Nurullah Altaş), Ensar Pub., Istanbul, pp. 375-405.
  • Kurudayıoğlu, M. V & Tüzel M. S. (2010); “21. Century Literacy Types, Changing Text Perception and Turkish Education”, TÜBAR,, P. 28, pp. 283-298.
  • Moore, D. (2007). Overcoming Religious Illiteracy; A Cultural Studies Approach to The Study of Religion in Secondary Education, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Özkal, N. And Çetingöz D. (2006), “Academic Success, Gender, Attitude and Use of Learning Strategies”, Educational Management in Theory and Practice, P. 46, pp. 259-275.
  • Özdamar, K. (1999). Statistical Data Analysis with Package Programs, Kaan Book store, Eskişehir
  • Prothero, S (2008). ReligiousLiteracy; What Every American Needs to Know and Doesn't, Harper Collins Publishers, New York,
  • Sağlam, S. (2006). Internal migration phenomenon and urbanization in Turkey. Hacettepe University Turkic Studies Studies (HÜTAD), (5), 33-44.
  • Wilkis, R. (1992). “Identify the Educators”, Priorities in Religious Education; A Model for the 1990s and Beyond, (Ed. Brenda Watson), The Falmer Press, London, 1992, p. 67-81.
  • Yıldırım, A., & ŞimŞek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Press, Ankara.
  • Yücel, Z. and Koç, M. (2011) “The Relationship Between Primary School Students' Attitudes Towards Mathematics Lesson Predicting Success Levels and Gender”, Elementary Education Online, , P. 10, pp. 133-143.

Evaluation of religious literacy skill levels in terms of various variables in religious education

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 4th Year Special Issue, 131 - 146, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1202458

Abstract

The main goal of this research is to determine the effect of Religious Culture and Moral Knowledge classes on religious literacy skills. Considering the type of people that religions aim to raise, religious literacy includes skills such as knowing the concepts, worship, belief principles, and historical realities that a religion expects its believers to have. The quantitative research method was used. In this context, success was applied to primary school students. While the general population of our research consists of primary school students, the study population consists of 105 students studying in the fourth grade of a primary school in a metropolitan city in the 2021-2022 academic year. The demographic characteristics of the students who participated in the research were examined in terms of gender and age. In addition, to determine the socio-economic status of students and their families; Questions about the education level of the parents were asked. In the study, it was concluded that the literacy levels of female students were higher, the level of religious literacy increased as the age of the students increased, and the education level of the parents was determinant when it comes to religious literacy. In addition, it was concluded that social media and the internet have rather more effect on religious literacy.

References

  • Aktas, Y. (1994). Working mother and her child. Education as You Live, (36), 7-11.
  • Altunişik, M. B. (2010). Turkey: Arab Perspectives. Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation, 1-32.
  • Apaydın, H. (2001); “The Effect of FamilyCommunication on the Child's Religious Development”, Ondokuz Mayıs University. Journal of the Faculty of Theology, pp. 12-13, pp. 319-337.
  • Atalay, T. (2006). “A Study on the Effect of Family Religiousness on the Religiousness of Youth”, Piety Symposium Papers and Negotiations, KURAV Pub., Bursa,
  • Aziz, A. (2014). Research Methods and Techniques in SocialSciences, 9th Edition, Nobel Pub., Ankara,
  • Bilgin, V. (2003). “Popular Culture and Religion: The Changing Face of Religiosity”, Uludağ University. Journal of theFaculty of Theology, P. 1, C. 12, p. 193-214.
  • Bilecik, S. (2015). The effect of religious culture and ethic scourses on religious literacy skills: A research on university students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], Necmettin Erbakan University.
  • Cirhinlioğlu, F. G. and Ok, Ü. (2011) “Are Women or Men More Religious?”, Zeitschriftfürdie Welt der Türken Journal of World of Turks, , P.1, C. 3, pp. 121-141.
  • Demirtas, H. & Ozer, N. (2007). “The Relationship Between Time Management Skills and Academic Achievement of Teacher Candidates”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Strategic Research in Education, P.1, C.2, pp. 34-47.
  • Koç, A. (2014); "Religious Education in Qur'an Courses", Religious Education (Ed. Mustafa Köylü and Nurullah Altaş), Ensar Pub., Istanbul, pp. 375-405.
  • Kurudayıoğlu, M. V & Tüzel M. S. (2010); “21. Century Literacy Types, Changing Text Perception and Turkish Education”, TÜBAR,, P. 28, pp. 283-298.
  • Moore, D. (2007). Overcoming Religious Illiteracy; A Cultural Studies Approach to The Study of Religion in Secondary Education, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  • Özkal, N. And Çetingöz D. (2006), “Academic Success, Gender, Attitude and Use of Learning Strategies”, Educational Management in Theory and Practice, P. 46, pp. 259-275.
  • Özdamar, K. (1999). Statistical Data Analysis with Package Programs, Kaan Book store, Eskişehir
  • Prothero, S (2008). ReligiousLiteracy; What Every American Needs to Know and Doesn't, Harper Collins Publishers, New York,
  • Sağlam, S. (2006). Internal migration phenomenon and urbanization in Turkey. Hacettepe University Turkic Studies Studies (HÜTAD), (5), 33-44.
  • Wilkis, R. (1992). “Identify the Educators”, Priorities in Religious Education; A Model for the 1990s and Beyond, (Ed. Brenda Watson), The Falmer Press, London, 1992, p. 67-81.
  • Yıldırım, A., & ŞimŞek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Press, Ankara.
  • Yücel, Z. and Koç, M. (2011) “The Relationship Between Primary School Students' Attitudes Towards Mathematics Lesson Predicting Success Levels and Gender”, Elementary Education Online, , P. 10, pp. 133-143.
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Metin Altunkaynak 0000-0001-6947-7526

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Submission Date November 10, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 4 Issue: 4th Year Special Issue

Cite

APA Altunkaynak, M. (2022). Evaluation of religious literacy skill levels in terms of various variables in religious education. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 4(4th Year Special Issue), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1202458

465221.                    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTlHwNdlfMtYefP6zNuxzJ7qJa6QuTIBRTFBQ&usqp=CAU         by.png                            open-access-logo-png-transparent.png                                                                       

IJES has a DOI number obtained from Crossref, is protected under the Creative Commons (cc-by) licence, and provides open access.