Advanced Exergy Analysis for Chemically Reacting Systems – Application to a Simple Open Gas-Turbine System

Year 2009, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 105 - 111, 01.09.2009

Tatiana Morosuk , George Tsatsaronis

Abstract

A conventional exergy analysis has some limitations, which are significantly reduced by an advanced exergy analysis. The latter evaluates: (a) the interactions among components of the overall system (splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts); and, (b) the real potential for improving a system component (splitting the exergy destruction into unavoidable and avoidable parts). The main role of an advanced exergy analysis is to provide engineers with additional information useful for improving the design and operation of energy conversion systems. This information cannot be supplied by any other approach. In previous publications, approaches were presented that were appropriate for application to closed thermodynamic cycles, without chemical reactions (e.g., refrigeration cycles). Here a general approach is discussed that could be applied to systems with chemical reactions. Application of this approach to a simple gas-turbine system reveals the potential for improvement and the interactions among the system components.

• This paper is an updated version of a paper published in the ECOS'08 proceedings. 

Keywords

exergy analysis, exergy destruction, avoidable exergy destruction, endogenous exergy destruction, gas-turbine system

References

• Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. and Moran, M., 1996, Thermal design and optimization. New York: Wiley.
• Cziesla, F., Tsatsaronis, G. and Gao, Z., 2006, “Avoidable thermodynamic inefficiencies and costs in an externally fired combined cycle power plant”, Energy Int. J., Vol. 31, No.10–11, pp. 1472–1489.
• Kelly, S., 2008, “Energy systems improvement based on endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction”, Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.
• Kelly, S, Tsatsaronis, G. and Morosuk, T., 2009,
• “Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts”, Energy Int. J., Vol. 34, pp. 384-391. Morosuk, T. and Tsatsaronis, G., 2006a, “The “Cycle
• Crete, Greece, Vol. 1, pp. 165–172. Morosuk, T. and Tsatsaronis, G., 2008, “New approach to the exergy analysis of absorption refrigeration machines”, Energy Int. J., Vol. 33, pp. 890-907.
• Tsatsaronis, G., 1999a, “Strengths and limitations of exergy analysis”, Thermodynamic optimization of complex energy systems, Bejan, A. and Mamut, E., eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer
• Academic Publishers, pp. 93–100. Tsatsaronis, G., 1999b, “Design optimization using exergoeconomics”, complex energy systems, Bejan, A. and Mamut, E., eds.,
• Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.101–117. Tsatsaronis, G., Kelly, S. and Morosuk, T., 2006,
• “Endogenous and exogenous exergy destruction in thermal systems”, Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, USA, CD-ROM, file 2006-13675.
• Tsatsaronis, G. and Morosuk, T., 2007, “Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation and its application to compression refrigeration machines”, Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Seattle, USA, CD-ROM, file 2007-41202.
• Tsatsaronis, G. and Park, M.H., 2002, “On avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions and investment costs in thermal systems”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 43, pp.1259–1270.