This
article sheds more light on the role of states and the bearing which political
and elite interests may have exerted on public support for Boko Haram. It
examines the political, socio-economic, and ideological context of the crisis
and moves on to map the two dominant de-radicalization approaches; top-down and
bottom-up approaches. The article exposes the fault lines of realism’s top-down
approaches toward national security in Northern Nigeria and proposes a bottom-up
approach as a complement to the earlier top-down model. An evaluation of both
approaches reveals that top-down approaches are state-centric and are
predisposed to realist techniques of wars centred on threat, use and control of
military force. The work specifically argues for a hybrid security model that
incorporates both elements on top down and bottom up security approaches. The key theoretical considerations employed
in the article relates to micro and macro theories of collective political
violence. The theories provide a better understanding of the underlying drivers
of violent extremism and radicalization that leads to terrorism and also
justification for the approaches used in countering them. The article answered
key research questions related to Top-down and Bottom-up security approaches.
African Foundation Research Institute
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | International Relations |
Journal Section | Articles |
Authors | |
Publication Date | May 13, 2020 |
Submission Date | September 2, 2019 |
Acceptance Date | April 13, 2020 |
Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 2 Issue: 3 |
Data Sharing Policy
This journal encourages authors to share the data obtained as a result of their research while remaining within the requirements of the universal and legal criteria for the protection of personal rights with scientific ethics and citation rules. In this context, IJPS adopts the Budapest Open Access Initiative Declaration (2001).