<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="review-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>ijsi</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>International Journal of Social Inquiry</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1307-8364</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">1307-9999</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Bursa Uludağ University</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37093/ijsi.1870419</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Political Movement</subject>
                                                            <subject>Political Theory and Political Philosophy</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Siyasal Akımlar</subject>
                                                            <subject>Siyasal Teori ve Siyaset Felsefesi</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>Transcending Modernity through Modernity: The New Order Design of the Conservative Revolution</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Moderniteyi Moderniteyle Aşmak: Muhafazakâr Devrimin Yeni Düzen Tasarımı</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2920-8049</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Kocatepe</surname>
                                    <given-names>Enes</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>ANTALYA BILIM UNIVERSITY</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20260430">
                    <day>04</day>
                    <month>30</month>
                    <year>2026</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>19</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>191</fpage>
                                        <lpage>206</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20260124">
                        <day>01</day>
                        <month>24</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20260225">
                        <day>02</day>
                        <month>25</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2008, International Journal of Social Inquiry</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2008</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>International Journal of Social Inquiry</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>The objective of this research is to examine the intellectual framework of the “Conservative Revolution” (Konservative Revolution) movement, which emerged within the chaotic atmosphere of the Weimar Republic following World War I, and its paradoxical relationship with modernity. Following an exploration of the movement’s ideological origins, the scope of the study is delimited to the spheres of politics, culture, and technology through the works of its primary actors: Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Oswald Spengler, and Ernst Jünger. The research analyzes how the movement instrumentalized modern dynamics such as technology, revolution, and cultural renewal to reconstruct a spiritual essence within new and modern forms. The primary conclusion reached is that the Conservative Revolution constructed a radical &quot;Third Way&quot; that rejected both the existing liberal-democratic status quo and the pre-war status quo ante. The movement broke away from classical conservatism, which perceived technology as a threat, and instead redefined these elements as foundational instruments for national sovereignty, spiritual awakening, and social mobility. Consequently, through Moeller van den Bruck’s corporate socialism, Spengler’s historical morphology, and Jünger’s metaphysical figure of the &quot;Worker,&quot; the study determines that the Conservative Revolution represents a constitutive and integrated worldview aiming to transcend modernity from within.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Bu araştırmanın amacı, Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonrası Weimar Cumhuriyeti’nin kaotik atmosferinde filizlenen “Muhafazakâr Devrim” (Konservative Revolution) hareketinin entelektüel yapısını ve bu yapının moderniteyle kurduğu paradoksal ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmanın kapsamı; hareketin ideolojik kökenlerini takiben, politika, kültür ve teknoloji alanlarını hareketin ana aktörleri olan Arthur Moeller van den Bruck, Oswald Spengler ve Ernst Jünger’in eserleri üzerinden sınırlandırılmaktadır. Araştırma, hareketin teknoloji, devrim ve kültürel yenilenme gibi modern dinamikleri, tinsel bir özü yeni ve modern formlar içerisinde yeniden inşa etmek amacıyla nasıl araçsallaştırdığını analiz etmektedir. Araştırmada ulaşılan temel sonuç; muhafazakâr devrimin hem mevcut liberal-demokratik statükoyu hem de savaş öncesi düzeni reddeden radikal bir “Üçüncü Yol” inşa ettiğidir. Hareket, teknolojiyi tehdit gören klasik muhafazakâr anlayıştan koparak; bu unsurları ulusal egemenliğin, manevi uyanışın ve toplumsal mobilitenin kurucu enstrümanları olarak yeniden tanımlamıştır. Sonuç olarak çalışma; Moeller van den Bruck’un korporatif sosyalizmi, Spengler’in çöküşü yeni bir başlangıç gören tarihsel morfolojisi ve Jünger’in metafizik “İşçi” figürü üzerinden, muhafazakâr devrimin moderniteyi kendi içerisinden aşmayı hedefleyen kurucu ve bütünleşik bir dünya görüşünü temsil ettiğini saptamaktadır.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Muhafazakâr Devrim</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Reaksiyoner Modernizm</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Arthur Moeller van den Bruck</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Oswald Spengler</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ernst Jünger</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Conservative Revolution</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Reactionary Modernism</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Arthur Moeller van den Bruck</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Oswald Spengler</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ernst Jünger</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akbaş, A. (2025). Oswald Spengler’i Yorumlamak: Batı’nın Çöküşü ve Döngüsel Tarih. Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz, 16(2), 267-305. https://doi.org/10.59281/turkiz.1603093</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aksakal, H. (2010). Oswald Spengler’in Tarih, Kültür ve Medeniyet Anlayışı. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, III (12), 37-42.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Armitage, J. (2003). On Ernst Jünger’s ‘Total Mobilization’: A Re-evaluation in the Era of the War on Terrorism. Body and Society, 9(4), 191-213.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bracher, K. D. (1970). The German dictatorship: The origins, structure, and effects of national socialism. Praeger.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Breuer, S. (1995). Anatomie der konservativen Revolution (C. 2). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Breuer, S. (2021). Ausgänge des Konservatismus. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bullock, M. P. (2012). Flight Forward: The World of Ernst Jünger’s Worker. Utopian Studies, 23(2), 450-471.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Engels, D. (2019). Oswald Spengler and the Decline of the West. İçinde M. Sedgwick (Ed.), Key thinkers of the radical right: Behind the new threat to liberal democracy. (ss. 3-21). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190877583.003.0001</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Faye, J. P. (1977). Totalitäre Sprachen: Kritik der narrativen Vernunft, Kritik der narrativen Ökonomie. Ullstein.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Greiffenhagen, M. (1977). Das Dilemma des Konservatismus in Deutschland. R. Piper &amp; Co. Verlag.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hasselbach, K., &amp; Jünger, E. (1994). Politics from the Spirit of Poetics: The Aesthetic Perspective of Ernst Jünger’s Der 
Arbeiter. Orbis Litterarum, 49(5), 272-292.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Herf, J. (1986). Reactionary modernism: Technology, culture, and politics in Weimar and the Third Reich. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hock, W. (1960). Deutscher Antikapitalismus: Der ideologische Kampf gegen die freie Wirtschaft im Zeichen der grossen Krise. Knapp.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">İnce, H. O. (2010). Muhafazakâr ideoloji din—Siyaset. Alan Yayıncılık.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jünger, E. (1925). Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis. Mittler.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jünger, E. (1930). Krieg und krieger. Junker und Dünnhaupt.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jünger, E. (1931). Die totale Mobilmachung. Verlag für Zeitkritik.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jünger, E. (1981). Der Arbeiter: Herrschaft und Gestalt. Klett-Cotta Verlag.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Klemperer, K. V. (1968). Germany’s New Conservatism: Its History and Dilemma in the Twentieth Century (2. bs). Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kunicki, W., Natalia, Ż., &amp; Żarski, K. (Ed.). (2021). Die Literatur der »Konservativen Revolution«: Schreiben zwischen Traditionalismus und Avantgarde. Vandenhoeck &amp; Ruprecht.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lenk, K. (1989). Deutscher Konservatismus. Campus.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lobenstein-Reichmann, A. (2002). Liberalismus – Demokratie – Konservativismus: Moeller van den Bruck, das Begriffssystem eines Konservativen zu Beginn der Weimarer Republik. Içinde D. Cherubim, K. Jakob, &amp; A. Linke (Ed.), Neue deutsche Sprachgeschichte: Mentalitäts-, kultur- und sozialgeschichtliche Zusammenhänge (ss. 183-206). de Gruyter.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mann, T. (1974). Betrachtungen eines Unpolitischen (2. bs). Fischer Verlag.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moeller van den Bruck, A. (1916). Der preussische Stil. R. Piper.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moeller van den Bruck, A. (1919). Das Recht der jungen Völker. R. Piper &amp; Company.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moeller van den Bruck, A. (1934). Germany’s third empire; authorized English edition (E. O. Lorimer, Çev.). George Allen &amp; Unwin.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mohler, A. (1989). Die konservative Revolution in Deutschland, 1918-1932: Ein Handbuch (Genişletilmiş ve Güncellenmiş 3. Baskı). Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mollaer, F. (2014). Muhafazakârlığın İki Yüzü. Dergâh Yayınları.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mosse, G. L. (1981). The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich. Schocken Books.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ottmann, H. (2010). Der Totalitarismus und seine Überwindung. Springer-Verlag.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Prümm, K. (1974). Die Literatur des Soldatischen Nationalismus der 20er Jahre (1918-1933): Gruppenideologie und Epochenproblematik. Scriptor Verlag.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rauschning, H. (1941). Die konservative Revolution: Versuch und Bruch mit Hitler. Freedom publishing Company.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rudolph, H. (1971). Kulturkritik und konservative Revolution: Zum Kulturell-politischen Denken Hofmannsthals und seinem problemgeschichtlichen Kontext. M. Niemeyer.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sarıtaş, İ. (2012). Alman muhafazakarlığı (1789-1945): Devrimden yıkıma. [Doktora Tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schmitz, W., &amp; Vollnhals, C. (2005). Völkische Bewegung—Konservative Revolution—Nationalsozialismus: Aspekte einer politisierten Kultur. Kultur und antidemokratische Politik in Deutschland (1. bs). Thelem.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schwarz, T. (1967). Zur Technikphilosophie Ernst Jüngers. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 15(5), 528-535.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sontheimer, K. (1962). Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik: Die politischen Ideen des deutschen Nationalismus zwischen 1918 und 1933. Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Spengler, O. (1933). Jahre der Entscheidung: Deutschland und die weltgeschichtliche Entwicklung. Erster Teil. Beck.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Spengler, O. (2024). Batı’nın Çöküşü (K. Daniş, Çev.). Ketebe Yayınevi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Steber, M. (2017). Die Hüter der Begriffe (C. 78). Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/106160/</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Stern, F. (1974). The Politics of Cultural Despair: A Study in the Rise of the Germanic Ideology. University of California Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Werth, C. H. (1996). Ernst Jünger: Der „Arbeiter“ im totalitären Maschinenstaat. İçinde C. H. Werth (Ed.), Sozialismus und Nation: Die deutsche Ideologiediskussion zwischen 1918 und 1945 (ss. 170-191). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
