Abstract
References
- Andreoni, J. and R. Petrie. (2004). “Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising”. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1605-1623.
- Charness, G. and U. Gneezy. (2008). “What is in a name? anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 29-35.
- Chen, Yan and X.S. Li. (2009). “Group identity and social preferences”. American Economic Review, 99, 431-457.
- Fong, C. M. and E. F.P. Luttmer. (2010). “Do fairness and race matter in generosity? evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment". Journal of Public Economics, 95 (5-6), 372-94
- List, J.A. and M.K. Price. (2009). “The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69, 160-169.
- Möbius, M. and A. Szeidl. (2007). “Trust and social collateral”. NBER Working paper, 13126. Roth, A. (1995). “Bargaining experiments”. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 253–348.
- Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner. (1979). “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA, Brooks-Cole.
NO MAN IS AN ISLAND: SOCIAL DISTANCE, NETWORK FLOW, AND OTHER-REGARDING BEHAVIORS IN A NATURAL FIELD EXPERIMENT
Abstract
A natural field experiment is designed to explore the impacts of social distance
and network flow on other-regarding behaviors. A greater degree of
communication between the voluntary organization and volunteers was found to
reduce their social distance and thereby improve volunteering commitment. The
improvement was even more notable if the party initiating communication was the
voluntary organization. Two other practical means of lessening social distance
were for volunteers to learn more about other volunteers, and for information to
be dispersed throughout the organization more rapidly. Additionally, this study
shows a reversed “U-shaped” relationship between network flow and volunteering
commitment.
Keywords
Volunteering Social distance Network flow Natural field experiment Other-regarding behaviors
References
- Andreoni, J. and R. Petrie. (2004). “Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising”. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8), 1605-1623.
- Charness, G. and U. Gneezy. (2008). “What is in a name? anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 29-35.
- Chen, Yan and X.S. Li. (2009). “Group identity and social preferences”. American Economic Review, 99, 431-457.
- Fong, C. M. and E. F.P. Luttmer. (2010). “Do fairness and race matter in generosity? evidence from a nationally representative charity experiment". Journal of Public Economics, 95 (5-6), 372-94
- List, J.A. and M.K. Price. (2009). “The role of social connections in charitable fundraising: Evidence from a natural field experiment”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69, 160-169.
- Möbius, M. and A. Szeidl. (2007). “Trust and social collateral”. NBER Working paper, 13126. Roth, A. (1995). “Bargaining experiments”. The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 253–348.
- Tajfel, H. and J. C. Turner. (1979). “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict”. In W. G. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA, Brooks-Cole.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Other ID | JA97DP68TB |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2012 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2012 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 |