MEASURING THE QUALITY OF URBAN LIFE AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SATISFACTION: FINDINGS FROM GAZIMAGUSA (FAMAGUSTA) AREA STUDY

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 27 - 37, 01.12.2010

Derya Oktay Ahmet Rustemli

Abstract

During the last few decades, measuring the perceived quality of urban life and residential environments has been one of the areas of inquiry for researches in the field of urbanism. The Famagusta Area Study (FAS) is one of those survey studies, through which objective and subjective measures of quality of urban life and neighbourhoods have been compiled using faceto-face interviews. Within the context of the Famagusta Area Study, both objective and subjective measures of quality of life were compiled. Using face-to-face interviews, 398 residents were interviewed in eight Famagusta neighbourhoods during the summer and fall 2007. This paper first presents an overview of the demographic, geographic, and urban context in Famagusta (N. Cyprus) where the study was conducted. It then reviews the methodology used in carrying out the research. Next, selected findings covering overall quality of urban life, neighbourhood satisfaction and factors influencing it, assessment of neighbourhood attributes, neighbouring and community issues, and other topics are presented. Finally, the uses of the findings for policy, planning and design are discussed along with key lessons learned from the project, and opportunities will be explored for further analysis of the data

Keywords

quality of urban life, neighbourhood satisfaction, user survey, Famagusta

References

• Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Rodgers, W, L. (1976), The Quality of American Life: Perceptions,
• Evaluations, and Satisfactions. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. Connerly, C., Marans, R.W. (1985), Comparing Two Global Measures of Perceived
• Neighbourhood Quality, Social Indicators Research, 17, 29-47. Jörgensen, B.S., Stedman, R.C. (2001), ”Sense of Place as An Attitude: Lakeshore property owners' attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21/3, 233-248.
• Marans, R.W. (2005). Modelling Residential Quality Using Subjective and Objective Measures.
• Methodologies of Housing Research, eds: D.U. Vebstro, Y. Hürol, and N. Wilkinson. The Urban International Press, London, 319-328. Marans, R. W. (2003), Understanding Environmental Quality through Quality of Life Studies: The DAS and Its Use of Subjective and Objective Indicators, Landscape and Urban Planning, , 73-83.
• Mazumdar, S. (2003), Sense of Place Considerations for Quality of Urban Life, Ist International
• Conference on Quality of Urban Life: Policy Versus Practice (Eds: Gülersoy, N.Z., Esin, N., Özsoy, A.) Istanbul Technical University, Urban and Environmental Planning Research Centre, Istanbul, 83-97. Oktay, D. (2009), Gazimağusa’da Yaşam Kalitesinin Ölçülmesi (Measuring the Quality of Urban
• Life in Famagusta), Unpublished Technical Report, Research Project # 106K145, TUBITAK (Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey), Ankara. Oktay, D. (2005), Cyprus: the South and the North, Urban Issues and Urban Policies in the New
• EU Countries, eds: R. Van Kempen, M. Vermeulen & A. Baan. Ashgate, Aldershut, 205-231. Pacione, M. (2003), Urban Environmental Quality and Human Wellbeing - A Social Geographical
• Perspective, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19-30.