CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY FACING WITH IN RELATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE

Year 2010, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 55 - 62, 01.12.2010

Fekete Mária Farkasné Anna Lóránt

Abstract

Apart from the financial risk the insurance industry are facing with in association with climate change, there are also opportunities to the sector to develop new markets and provide coverage against weather related risks. This study presents a possible method to examine the potential for introducing a new insurance product, namely an agricultural flood insurance scheme in the United Kingdom. The investigation included the calculation of agricultural flood damage costs, the possible changes in flood risk, the description of farmers’ risk attitude and interests in insurance. In a small scale survey, farmers were asked their experiences related to flooding, farm management practices and their willingness to pay for flood insurance using a contingent valuation method. Using statistical analysis it was found the insurance demand is positively correlated with the damage cost predicted and association is likely between farm types and WTP for insurance. Linear regression model suggests that the demand for flood insurance is low amongst farmers in the present risk level. The findings of this research highlight that there is little evidence for the viability of a farmer financed agricultural flood insurance scheme at the moment in the United Kingdom

Keywords

climate change, agriculture, insurance

References

• CEA (2008), Tackling Climate Change, Association of European Insurers, Belgium.
• European Commission (2010), „Health Check” of the Common Agricultural Policy, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/healthcheck/index_en.htm (accessed 24/02)
• Európai Parlament (2007), „Sajtóközlemények”, available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+IM
• PRESS+20070606IPR07553+0+DOC+XML+V0//HU (accessed 24/02)
• Frew, E., Wolstenholme, J. L. and Whynes, D. K. (2001), "Willingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screening", European journal of cancer, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 1746-1751.
• Garrod, G. and Willis, K. (2001), Economic Valuation of the Environment, 1st ed, Edward Elgar
• Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham IMF (2009), World Economic Outlook Database, available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2009/02/weodata/weoselser.aspx?c=111&t=1 (accessed /08)
• Lewis, A. and Mathieu, D. (1999), Pharmaceutical Experimental Design, 2nd ed, Marcel Dekker AG, New York.
• LMF (2009), Coping with Climate Change – Risks and Opportunities for Insurers, London Market Faculty, London.
• Munich Re (2010), The Ten Largest Natural Catastrophes in 2009, available at: http://www.munichre.com/en/publications/default.aspx?category=17 (accessed 02/08)
• Nix, J. (ed.) (2008), Farm Management Pocketbook, 39th ed, The Andersons Centre, London.
• Penning-Rowsell, E. and Chatterton, J. (1977), The Benefits of Flood Alleviation, 1st ed, Saxon
• House, Teakfield Limited, England. Posthumus, H. and Morris, J. (2008), Agricultural Damage Caused by the Summer 2007 Floods in
• England, Environment Agency, Bristol. Robson, C. (2002), Real World Research, 2nd ed, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
• Sherrick, B. J. and Barry, P. J. (2001), "Factors Influencing Farmers' Crop Insurance Decisions",
• American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 103-111. Slovic, P. (2000), The Perception of Risk, 1st ed, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London.
• The Geneva Association (2009), The Insurance Industry and Climate Change – Contribution to the Global Debate, no. 2, The Geneva Association, Switzerland.