Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Les Conventions Préparatoires

Year 2024, Issue: 74, 1 - 18, 30.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001

Abstract

La phase précontractuelle est une zone grise, difficile à cerner et gouvernée par la liberté contractuelle. Les parties sont libres d’organiser leurs pourparlers conventionnellement et s’imposer des devoirs contractuels même en période précontractuelle. Par convention précontractuelle nous entendons un acte bilatéral qui vise la conclusion du contrat négocié. Puisque le Code des Obligations turc ne consacre pas une section spécifique aux pourparlers les parties ont grand intérêt à organiser cette phase et définir les règles à suivre et leurs comportements réciproques. Les parties peuvent former des actes précontractuels sous des formes et avec des contenus très variés. Nous allons nous limiter aux actes bilatéraux conclus entre les parties puisque nous examinons les conventions préparatoires. Par conséquent, les actes unilatéraux tels que la lettre d’intention envoyée par l’une des parties avec l’intention de débuter les pourparlers ne seraient pas traités dans cet article. Ainsi nous envisageons une étude sur les conventions précontractuelles en tenant compte de leur effet obligatoire. Dans un premier temps, nous traiterons les conventions qu’on pourrait appeler les contrats préparatoires qui créent un effet obligatoire pour au moins une des parties, et ensuite nous examinerons les conventions munies d’un tel effet.

References

  • Antalya G, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. V/1,1 Seçkin, 2019.) google scholar
  • Ayrancı H, Ön Sözleşme (Yetkin 2006). google scholar
  • Barlas N, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı ve Çerçeve Sözleşmenin Özellikleri’ in Makalelerim (C.1, Vedat Kitapçılık 2008) 89- 111. google scholar
  • Demirsatan S, Türk Borçlar Kanunu Çerçevesinde Sözleşmenin Haksız Olarak Sona Erdirilmesi (2e ed. On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Dirix E, ‘Le « Gentlemen’s Agreement » dans la theorie du droit et la pratique contemporaine’ (1999) Revue de Droit international et de Droit compare 76 (3) 223 - 245. google scholar
  • Doğan G, Ön Sözleşme (Sözleşme Yapma Vaadi) (Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayınları 2006). google scholar
  • Eren F, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Yetkin 2021). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S et Kurşun A S, ‘TBK m. 29’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S, Olumsuz Zarar (Beta 2008). google scholar
  • Esin İ G, Birleşme ve Devralmalar, (1ere ed, On iki Levha 2020.) google scholar
  • Fontaine M et de Ly F, Droit des Contrats Internationaux, Analyse et redaction des clauses (Bruylant 2003). google scholar
  • François C, ‘Presentation des articles 1112 a 1112-2 de la nouvelle sous-section 1 « Les negociations »’ in La reforme du droit des contrats presentee par l’IEJ de Paris 1, https:// iej.univ-paris1.fr/openaccess/reforme-contrats/titre3/stitre1/chap2/sect1/ssect1-negociations/ consulte le 2 Juillet 2023. google scholar
  • Gönen D, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Filiz Kitabevi 2021). google scholar
  • Grosheide W, ‘The Gentlemen’s Agreement in legal theory and in modern practice - The Dutch civil law perspective’ in Ewoud Hondius (ed) Netherland’s Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law (Intersentia 1998) 91 - 114. google scholar
  • Güvenç Ö, Sözleşmenin Kurulmasında İrade Açıklamalarının Yorumu (Adalet 2021). google scholar
  • Işıntan P, Sözleşme Müzakereleri (Galatasaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü these de doctorat non-publiee 2009). google scholar
  • Kılıçoğlu A M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Turhan Kitabevi 2022). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Borçlar Hukukuna Giriş, Hukuki İşlem, Sözleşme (Borçlar Hukuku Genel Bölüm C.1, 4e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 2008). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Türk Medeni Hukukunda Gayrimenkul Satış Vaadi (Sulhi Garan Matbaası 1959). (Satış Vaadi) google scholar
  • Kuntalp E, Karışık Muhtevalı Akit (2e ed, BTHAE 2013). google scholar
  • Kuonen N, La Responsabilite Precontractuelle (Schultess 2007). google scholar
  • Lake R B et Draetta U, Letters of Intent and other precontractual documents (2e ed, Butterworths 1994). google scholar
  • Marcel Rehfous, ‘La Formation du Contrat et L’Avant-contrat en matiere immobiliere’ (1965) Semaine Judiciaire, 305 - 336. google scholar
  • Marchand S, Clauses Contractuelles - Du bon usage de la liberte contractuelle (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2008). google scholar
  • Nomer H, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (17e ed. Beta 2020). google scholar
  • Oğuzman M K et Öz M T, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. 1,20e ed. Vedat Kitapçılık 2022). google scholar
  • Oral T, ‘Niyet Mektubu’ in TAAD 7 (28) 145 - 171. google scholar
  • Peloquin L et Assie C K, ‘La Lettre d’Intention’ in (2006) Revue Juridique Themis 1 (40) 175-204. google scholar
  • Poltier E, ‘Les gentlemen’s agreements â participation publique’ (1987) Revue de Droit suisse 106 (3) 367 - 402. google scholar
  • Schlosser R, ‘Les lettres d’intention: portee et sanctions des accords precontractuels’ in Responsabilite Civile et Assurance : Etudes en l’honneur de Baptiste Rusconi (Editions Bis et Ter 2000) 345 - 362. google scholar
  • Schneider W T, ‘La Codification d’Institutions Pretoriennes’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 39- 49. google scholar
  • Şen Doğramacı H, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı, Çerçeve Sözleşmelerin Amacı ve Ekonomik Fonksiyonu’ (2022) Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3 (30) 1043 - 1077. google scholar
  • Serozan R, ‘TBK m. 2’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Sungurbey İ, Kişisel Hakların Tapu Kütüğüne Şerhi (Sermet Matbaası 1963). google scholar
  • Taşatan C, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Taşkın Z D, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (Oniki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tekinay S S, Akman S et al., Tekinay Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (7e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 1993). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (2e ed. On iki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Le Droit des Obligations (6e ed. Completee et mise â jour, Schultess Editions Romandes 2019). google scholar
  • Terre F, Simler P et Lequette Y, Droit Civil Les Obligations (8e ed. Dalloz 2002). google scholar
  • Witz C, ‘Pourquoi la reforme et pourquoi s’y interesser en France’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 11-17. google scholar

Preparatory Conventions

Year 2024, Issue: 74, 1 - 18, 30.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001

Abstract

The precontractual phase is a gray area, difficult to define, and governed by freedom of contract. Even during the precontractual phase, the parties retain the freedom to organize their talks by agreement and to enforce contractual obligations. We refer to an act preceding the formation of the negotiated contract as a precontractual act. The Turkish Code of Obligations does not devote a specific section concerning negotiations; hence, the parties are greatly interested in organizing this phase and defining the rules to follow and their reciprocal behavior. The parties may form precontractual acts in various forms and any substance. We will limit ourselves to bilateral acts that we will call conventions; thus, unilateral actions such as the letter of intent sent by one of the parties to start negotiations will not be addressed in this article. Therefore, we intend to examine bilateral precontractual agreements, and their mandatory effect shall be the criterion. First, we will deal with preparatory contracts that create a mandatory effect for at least one of the parties. Subsequently, we will analyze alternative precontractual conventions devoid of such an effect.

References

  • Antalya G, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. V/1,1 Seçkin, 2019.) google scholar
  • Ayrancı H, Ön Sözleşme (Yetkin 2006). google scholar
  • Barlas N, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı ve Çerçeve Sözleşmenin Özellikleri’ in Makalelerim (C.1, Vedat Kitapçılık 2008) 89- 111. google scholar
  • Demirsatan S, Türk Borçlar Kanunu Çerçevesinde Sözleşmenin Haksız Olarak Sona Erdirilmesi (2e ed. On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Dirix E, ‘Le « Gentlemen’s Agreement » dans la theorie du droit et la pratique contemporaine’ (1999) Revue de Droit international et de Droit compare 76 (3) 223 - 245. google scholar
  • Doğan G, Ön Sözleşme (Sözleşme Yapma Vaadi) (Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayınları 2006). google scholar
  • Eren F, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Yetkin 2021). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S et Kurşun A S, ‘TBK m. 29’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S, Olumsuz Zarar (Beta 2008). google scholar
  • Esin İ G, Birleşme ve Devralmalar, (1ere ed, On iki Levha 2020.) google scholar
  • Fontaine M et de Ly F, Droit des Contrats Internationaux, Analyse et redaction des clauses (Bruylant 2003). google scholar
  • François C, ‘Presentation des articles 1112 a 1112-2 de la nouvelle sous-section 1 « Les negociations »’ in La reforme du droit des contrats presentee par l’IEJ de Paris 1, https:// iej.univ-paris1.fr/openaccess/reforme-contrats/titre3/stitre1/chap2/sect1/ssect1-negociations/ consulte le 2 Juillet 2023. google scholar
  • Gönen D, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Filiz Kitabevi 2021). google scholar
  • Grosheide W, ‘The Gentlemen’s Agreement in legal theory and in modern practice - The Dutch civil law perspective’ in Ewoud Hondius (ed) Netherland’s Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law (Intersentia 1998) 91 - 114. google scholar
  • Güvenç Ö, Sözleşmenin Kurulmasında İrade Açıklamalarının Yorumu (Adalet 2021). google scholar
  • Işıntan P, Sözleşme Müzakereleri (Galatasaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü these de doctorat non-publiee 2009). google scholar
  • Kılıçoğlu A M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Turhan Kitabevi 2022). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Borçlar Hukukuna Giriş, Hukuki İşlem, Sözleşme (Borçlar Hukuku Genel Bölüm C.1, 4e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 2008). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Türk Medeni Hukukunda Gayrimenkul Satış Vaadi (Sulhi Garan Matbaası 1959). (Satış Vaadi) google scholar
  • Kuntalp E, Karışık Muhtevalı Akit (2e ed, BTHAE 2013). google scholar
  • Kuonen N, La Responsabilite Precontractuelle (Schultess 2007). google scholar
  • Lake R B et Draetta U, Letters of Intent and other precontractual documents (2e ed, Butterworths 1994). google scholar
  • Marcel Rehfous, ‘La Formation du Contrat et L’Avant-contrat en matiere immobiliere’ (1965) Semaine Judiciaire, 305 - 336. google scholar
  • Marchand S, Clauses Contractuelles - Du bon usage de la liberte contractuelle (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2008). google scholar
  • Nomer H, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (17e ed. Beta 2020). google scholar
  • Oğuzman M K et Öz M T, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. 1,20e ed. Vedat Kitapçılık 2022). google scholar
  • Oral T, ‘Niyet Mektubu’ in TAAD 7 (28) 145 - 171. google scholar
  • Peloquin L et Assie C K, ‘La Lettre d’Intention’ in (2006) Revue Juridique Themis 1 (40) 175-204. google scholar
  • Poltier E, ‘Les gentlemen’s agreements â participation publique’ (1987) Revue de Droit suisse 106 (3) 367 - 402. google scholar
  • Schlosser R, ‘Les lettres d’intention: portee et sanctions des accords precontractuels’ in Responsabilite Civile et Assurance : Etudes en l’honneur de Baptiste Rusconi (Editions Bis et Ter 2000) 345 - 362. google scholar
  • Schneider W T, ‘La Codification d’Institutions Pretoriennes’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 39- 49. google scholar
  • Şen Doğramacı H, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı, Çerçeve Sözleşmelerin Amacı ve Ekonomik Fonksiyonu’ (2022) Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3 (30) 1043 - 1077. google scholar
  • Serozan R, ‘TBK m. 2’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Sungurbey İ, Kişisel Hakların Tapu Kütüğüne Şerhi (Sermet Matbaası 1963). google scholar
  • Taşatan C, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Taşkın Z D, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (Oniki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tekinay S S, Akman S et al., Tekinay Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (7e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 1993). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (2e ed. On iki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Le Droit des Obligations (6e ed. Completee et mise â jour, Schultess Editions Romandes 2019). google scholar
  • Terre F, Simler P et Lequette Y, Droit Civil Les Obligations (8e ed. Dalloz 2002). google scholar
  • Witz C, ‘Pourquoi la reforme et pourquoi s’y interesser en France’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 11-17. google scholar
Year 2024, Issue: 74, 1 - 18, 30.05.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001

Abstract

References

  • Antalya G, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. V/1,1 Seçkin, 2019.) google scholar
  • Ayrancı H, Ön Sözleşme (Yetkin 2006). google scholar
  • Barlas N, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı ve Çerçeve Sözleşmenin Özellikleri’ in Makalelerim (C.1, Vedat Kitapçılık 2008) 89- 111. google scholar
  • Demirsatan S, Türk Borçlar Kanunu Çerçevesinde Sözleşmenin Haksız Olarak Sona Erdirilmesi (2e ed. On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Dirix E, ‘Le « Gentlemen’s Agreement » dans la theorie du droit et la pratique contemporaine’ (1999) Revue de Droit international et de Droit compare 76 (3) 223 - 245. google scholar
  • Doğan G, Ön Sözleşme (Sözleşme Yapma Vaadi) (Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayınları 2006). google scholar
  • Eren F, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Yetkin 2021). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S et Kurşun A S, ‘TBK m. 29’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Ergüne M S, Olumsuz Zarar (Beta 2008). google scholar
  • Esin İ G, Birleşme ve Devralmalar, (1ere ed, On iki Levha 2020.) google scholar
  • Fontaine M et de Ly F, Droit des Contrats Internationaux, Analyse et redaction des clauses (Bruylant 2003). google scholar
  • François C, ‘Presentation des articles 1112 a 1112-2 de la nouvelle sous-section 1 « Les negociations »’ in La reforme du droit des contrats presentee par l’IEJ de Paris 1, https:// iej.univ-paris1.fr/openaccess/reforme-contrats/titre3/stitre1/chap2/sect1/ssect1-negociations/ consulte le 2 Juillet 2023. google scholar
  • Gönen D, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (Filiz Kitabevi 2021). google scholar
  • Grosheide W, ‘The Gentlemen’s Agreement in legal theory and in modern practice - The Dutch civil law perspective’ in Ewoud Hondius (ed) Netherland’s Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law (Intersentia 1998) 91 - 114. google scholar
  • Güvenç Ö, Sözleşmenin Kurulmasında İrade Açıklamalarının Yorumu (Adalet 2021). google scholar
  • Işıntan P, Sözleşme Müzakereleri (Galatasaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü these de doctorat non-publiee 2009). google scholar
  • Kılıçoğlu A M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (26e ed. Turhan Kitabevi 2022). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Borçlar Hukukuna Giriş, Hukuki İşlem, Sözleşme (Borçlar Hukuku Genel Bölüm C.1, 4e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 2008). google scholar
  • Kocayusufpaşaoğlu N, Türk Medeni Hukukunda Gayrimenkul Satış Vaadi (Sulhi Garan Matbaası 1959). (Satış Vaadi) google scholar
  • Kuntalp E, Karışık Muhtevalı Akit (2e ed, BTHAE 2013). google scholar
  • Kuonen N, La Responsabilite Precontractuelle (Schultess 2007). google scholar
  • Lake R B et Draetta U, Letters of Intent and other precontractual documents (2e ed, Butterworths 1994). google scholar
  • Marcel Rehfous, ‘La Formation du Contrat et L’Avant-contrat en matiere immobiliere’ (1965) Semaine Judiciaire, 305 - 336. google scholar
  • Marchand S, Clauses Contractuelles - Du bon usage de la liberte contractuelle (Helbing Lichtenhahn 2008). google scholar
  • Nomer H, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler, (17e ed. Beta 2020). google scholar
  • Oğuzman M K et Öz M T, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (C. 1,20e ed. Vedat Kitapçılık 2022). google scholar
  • Oral T, ‘Niyet Mektubu’ in TAAD 7 (28) 145 - 171. google scholar
  • Peloquin L et Assie C K, ‘La Lettre d’Intention’ in (2006) Revue Juridique Themis 1 (40) 175-204. google scholar
  • Poltier E, ‘Les gentlemen’s agreements â participation publique’ (1987) Revue de Droit suisse 106 (3) 367 - 402. google scholar
  • Schlosser R, ‘Les lettres d’intention: portee et sanctions des accords precontractuels’ in Responsabilite Civile et Assurance : Etudes en l’honneur de Baptiste Rusconi (Editions Bis et Ter 2000) 345 - 362. google scholar
  • Schneider W T, ‘La Codification d’Institutions Pretoriennes’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 39- 49. google scholar
  • Şen Doğramacı H, ‘Çerçeve Sözleşme Kavramı, Çerçeve Sözleşmelerin Amacı ve Ekonomik Fonksiyonu’ (2022) Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 3 (30) 1043 - 1077. google scholar
  • Serozan R, ‘TBK m. 2’ in Turgut Öz, Faruk Acar et al. (eds), İstanbul Şerhi Türk Borçlar Kanunu (C. 1 (Madde 1-82), Vedat Kitapçılık 2019). google scholar
  • Sungurbey İ, Kişisel Hakların Tapu Kütüğüne Şerhi (Sermet Matbaası 1963). google scholar
  • Taşatan C, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (On iki Levha 2021). google scholar
  • Taşkın Z D, Sözleşmenin Kurulması (Oniki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tekinay S S, Akman S et al., Tekinay Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (7e ed, Filiz Kitabevi 1993). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu M, Borçlar Hukuku Genel Hükümler (2e ed. On iki Levha 2020). google scholar
  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Le Droit des Obligations (6e ed. Completee et mise â jour, Schultess Editions Romandes 2019). google scholar
  • Terre F, Simler P et Lequette Y, Droit Civil Les Obligations (8e ed. Dalloz 2002). google scholar
  • Witz C, ‘Pourquoi la reforme et pourquoi s’y interesser en France’ in Claude Witz et Filippo Ranieri (eds), La Reforme du Droit Allemand des Obligations Colloque du 31 Mai 2002 et nouveaux aspects (Societe de Legislation Comparee 2004) 11-17. google scholar
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language French
Subjects Law in Context (Other)
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Pelin Işıntan 0000-0002-8283-234X

Publication Date May 30, 2024
Submission Date August 15, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2024 Issue: 74

Cite

APA Işıntan, P. (2024). Les Conventions Préparatoires. Annales De La Faculté De Droit d’Istanbul(74), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001
AMA Işıntan P. Les Conventions Préparatoires. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. May 2024;(74):1-18. doi:10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001
Chicago Işıntan, Pelin. “Les Conventions Préparatoires”. Annales De La Faculté De Droit d’Istanbul, no. 74 (May 2024): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001.
EndNote Işıntan P (May 1, 2024) Les Conventions Préparatoires. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 74 1–18.
IEEE P. Işıntan, “Les Conventions Préparatoires”, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, no. 74, pp. 1–18, May 2024, doi: 10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001.
ISNAD Işıntan, Pelin. “Les Conventions Préparatoires”. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 74 (May 2024), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001.
JAMA Işıntan P. Les Conventions Préparatoires. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. 2024;:1–18.
MLA Işıntan, Pelin. “Les Conventions Préparatoires”. Annales De La Faculté De Droit d’Istanbul, no. 74, 2024, pp. 1-18, doi:10.26650/annales.2024.74.0001.
Vancouver Işıntan P. Les Conventions Préparatoires. Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul. 2024(74):1-18.