Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH

Year 2016, Volume: 66 Issue: 2, 1 - 29, 01.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331663

Abstract








Although there has been reasonable progress in the epidemiology of air
pollution, significant changes in international air pollution guidelines, and
the emergence of more systematic approaches to air pollution control, there
has been little attempt to explain the origin of the air pollution problem in
the first place. How did we come to this point? It is a fact that Neoclassical
Environmental Economic view, even if it is not the sole cause, is still a major
influence for the theories of natural capitalism and environmental finances.
Therefore, with this increasing influence, Neoclassical Environmental
Economics have been at the very centre of public policies on environmental
issues for decades. The question of whether Neoclassical Environmental
Economics is the best economic approach for policy decision-making is
a very controversial subject, and there are few alternative approaches to
Neoclassical Environmental Economics. This study provides some insight
into air pollution and its impacts on health, starting from the Neoclassical
Economic perspective and reviewing the main alternative approaches to
reach a very balanced global environmental understanding. 




References

  • Ad-Hoc Group on the Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution. 1999. Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution, Department of Health. The Stationery Office. London.
  • Bonner, J. 1995. Economic Efficiency and Social Justice; The Development of Utilitarian Ideas in Economics from Bentham to Edgeworth. England: Edward Elgar.
  • Brian, M. 2000. Designing The Green Economy: The Post-industrial Alternative to Corporate Globalization. Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics (BTRE). Working Papers 2005. Health Impacts of Transport Emissions in Australia: Environmental Cost. Australia: The Department of Transport and Regional Services.
  • Cato, M. S. and M. Kenneth. 1999. Green Economics: Beyond Supply and Demand to Meeting People’s Needs. Aberystwyth: Green Audit Books.
  • Choudhury, R. 1995. Ethics and Economics: A View from Ecological Economics. International Journal of Social Economics. 22(3): 18-25.
  • Colander, L. 1989. History of Economic Theory. USA: Houghton Muffin.
  • Colin, H. 2000. Localization: A Global Manifesto. London: Earthscan.
  • Cordato, R. 2004. An Austrian Theory of Environmental Economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 28: 3-36.
  • Cordato, R. E. 2001. The Polluter Pays Principle: A Proper Guide for Environmental Policy Studies in Social Cost, Regulation, and the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1998. Time Passage and the Economics of Coming to the Nuisance: Reassessing the Coasean Perspective. Campbell Law Review 20 (2): 273-92.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1995. Pollution Taxes and the Pretense of Efficiency. Journal of Private Enterprise. 10: 105-18.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1992a. Welfare Economics and Externalities in an Open Ended Universe. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1992b. Knowledge Problems and the Problem of Social Cost. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (Fall): 209-24.
  • Costanza, R., and C. H. Perrings. 1990. A Flexible Assurance Bonding System for Improved Environmental Management. Ecological Economics, 2: 57-76.
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). 2006. An Economic Analysis to Inform the Air Quality Strategy Review Consultation. London: Crown.
  • Derek W. 2005. Babylon and Beyond : The Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements. London: Pluto Press.
  • Des Jordins, J. 2001. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. Canada: Wadsworth.
  • European Environment Agency (EEA). 2004. Air Pollution in Europe 1999-2000. Copenhegan: Topic Report 4/2003.
  • Fisher, G. W., Rolfe, K. A., Kjellstroom, T., Woodward, A., Hales, S., Sturman, A. P., Kingham, S., Petersen, J., Shrestha, R., and King, D. 2002. Health Effects due to Motor Vehicle Air Pollution In New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: A Report Submitted to Ministry of Transport.
  • Hanley. N., and C. L Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. England Edward Elgar.
  • Health Effects Institute. HEI. 2000. Strategic Plan for the Health Effects of Air Pollution 2000–2005. Cambridge MA: Health Effects Institute:1–26.
  • Institute for European Environment Policy. 2005. Workshop on Best Practices in Analysing and Developing Environmental Policy. 15 November 2005. Brussels: Workshop Report
  • Kirzner, I. 1988. Welfare Economics: A Modern Austrian Perspective. In Man, Economy, and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard. ed. Walter Block and Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. 77-88. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Kjellstrom, T., Neller, A., and R. W. Simpson. 2002. Air Pollution and Its Health Impacts: The Changing Panorama. Medical Journal of Austria 177 (2): 604-608.
  • Kneese, A., Ayres R.U., and. R. C. Arge. 1973. Economics and the Environment: A Materials Balance Approach. In Pollution, Resources, and the Environment. ed. Alain C. Enthoven. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Krecke, E. 1996. Law and the Market Order: An Austrian Critique of the Economic Analysis of Law. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 7 (1): 19-37.
  • Lewin, P. 1982. Pollution Externalities, Social Costs and Strict Liability. Cato Journal 2 (1): 205-30.
  • Lord, C. 2003. A Citizens’ Income: A Foundation for a Sustainable World. Charlbury: Jon Carpenter.
  • McGee, R., and W. Block 1994. Pollution Trading Permits as a form of Market Socialism and the Search for a Real Market Solution to Environmental Pollution. Fordham Environmental Law Journal 6: 51-77.
  • McRobie, G. 1981. Small is Possible. England: Abakus.
  • Menger, C. [1870] 1981. Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press.
  • Michael, J. 1993. The Green Economy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  • Mill, J. S. 1965. Principal of Political Economy. 2 (3), ed. by J. M. Robson. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Mises, L. von. [1949] 1998. Human Action. Scholar’s Edition. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • North, G. 2002. Undermining Property Rights: Coase and Becker. Journal of Libertarian Studies 16 (4): 75-100.
  • Orr, L. D. 1981. Social Costs, Incentive Structures, and Environmental Policies. In Bureaucracy vs. Environment: The Environmental Costs of Bureaucratic Governance. ed. J. Baden and R. Stroup,. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Paul, M. 2005. Energy Beyond Oil, Leicester: Matador.
  • Pearce, D., and K. Turner. 1992. Packaging Waste and the Polluter Pays Principle: A Taxation Solution. Journal of Environmental Management and Planning 35 (1): 5-15.
  • Pigou, A. C. 1956. Memorials of Alfred Marshal, New York: Kelley and Milman.
  • Posner, R. 1973. Economic Analysis of the Law. Boston: Little Brown.
  • Roll, E. 1992. A History of Economic Thought, Fifth edition. England: Faber and Faber.
  • Rothbard, M. [1956] 1977. Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics. New York: Center for Libertarian Studies.
  • Rothbard, M. 1982. Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution. Cato Journal 2 (1): 55-100.
  • Sagoff, M. 1990. The Economy of the Earth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schumacher, E. F. 1973. Small is Beautiful. England: Abakus.
  • Seethaler, R. K., Kunzli, N., Sommer, H., Chanel, O., Herry, M., Masson, S., Vernaud J-C., Filiger, P., Horak, F. Jr., Kaiser, R., Medina, S., Puybonnieux-Texier, V., Quenel, P., Schneider, J., Studnicka, M., and J. Heldstab. 2003. Economic Costs of Air Pollution Related Health Impacts: An Impact Assessment Project of Austria, France and Switzerland. Clean Air and Environment Quality 37 (1), February 2003: 35-43.
  • Woodin, M., and C. Lucas 2004. Green Alternatives to Globalization: A Manifesto. London: Pluto Press World Health Organization (WHO). 1999. Overview of the Environment and Health in Europe in the 1990s. Third Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health. London, 16-18 June 1999, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2000a, Quantification of the health effects of exposure to air pollution. Report of a World Health Organization working group, Bilthoven, Netherlands, November.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2000b. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. second edition, WHO Regional Publications, European Series, 91, Geneva.

THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH

Year 2016, Volume: 66 Issue: 2, 1 - 29, 01.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331663

Abstract








Although there has been reasonable progress in the epidemiology of air
pollution, significant changes in international air pollution guidelines, and
the emergence of more systematic approaches to air pollution control, there
has been little attempt to explain the origin of the air pollution problem in
the first place. How did we come to this point? It is a fact that Neoclassical
Environmental Economic view, even if it is not the sole cause, is still a major
influence for the theories of natural capitalism and environmental finances.
Therefore, with this increasing influence, Neoclassical Environmental
Economics have been at the very centre of public policies on environmental
issues for decades. The question of whether Neoclassical Environmental
Economics is the best economic approach for policy decision-making is
a very controversial subject, and there are few alternative approaches to
Neoclassical Environmental Economics. This study provides some insight
into air pollution and its impacts on health, starting from the Neoclassical
Economic perspective and reviewing the main alternative approaches to
reach a very balanced global environmental understanding. 




References

  • Ad-Hoc Group on the Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution. 1999. Economic Appraisal of the Health Effects of Air Pollution, Department of Health. The Stationery Office. London.
  • Bonner, J. 1995. Economic Efficiency and Social Justice; The Development of Utilitarian Ideas in Economics from Bentham to Edgeworth. England: Edward Elgar.
  • Brian, M. 2000. Designing The Green Economy: The Post-industrial Alternative to Corporate Globalization. Lanham. MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics (BTRE). Working Papers 2005. Health Impacts of Transport Emissions in Australia: Environmental Cost. Australia: The Department of Transport and Regional Services.
  • Cato, M. S. and M. Kenneth. 1999. Green Economics: Beyond Supply and Demand to Meeting People’s Needs. Aberystwyth: Green Audit Books.
  • Choudhury, R. 1995. Ethics and Economics: A View from Ecological Economics. International Journal of Social Economics. 22(3): 18-25.
  • Colander, L. 1989. History of Economic Theory. USA: Houghton Muffin.
  • Colin, H. 2000. Localization: A Global Manifesto. London: Earthscan.
  • Cordato, R. 2004. An Austrian Theory of Environmental Economics. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 28: 3-36.
  • Cordato, R. E. 2001. The Polluter Pays Principle: A Proper Guide for Environmental Policy Studies in Social Cost, Regulation, and the Environment. Washington, D.C.: Institute for Research on the Economics of Taxation.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1998. Time Passage and the Economics of Coming to the Nuisance: Reassessing the Coasean Perspective. Campbell Law Review 20 (2): 273-92.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1995. Pollution Taxes and the Pretense of Efficiency. Journal of Private Enterprise. 10: 105-18.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1992a. Welfare Economics and Externalities in an Open Ended Universe. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Cordato, R. E. 1992b. Knowledge Problems and the Problem of Social Cost. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (Fall): 209-24.
  • Costanza, R., and C. H. Perrings. 1990. A Flexible Assurance Bonding System for Improved Environmental Management. Ecological Economics, 2: 57-76.
  • Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). 2006. An Economic Analysis to Inform the Air Quality Strategy Review Consultation. London: Crown.
  • Derek W. 2005. Babylon and Beyond : The Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements. London: Pluto Press.
  • Des Jordins, J. 2001. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy. Canada: Wadsworth.
  • European Environment Agency (EEA). 2004. Air Pollution in Europe 1999-2000. Copenhegan: Topic Report 4/2003.
  • Fisher, G. W., Rolfe, K. A., Kjellstroom, T., Woodward, A., Hales, S., Sturman, A. P., Kingham, S., Petersen, J., Shrestha, R., and King, D. 2002. Health Effects due to Motor Vehicle Air Pollution In New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: A Report Submitted to Ministry of Transport.
  • Hanley. N., and C. L Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. England Edward Elgar.
  • Health Effects Institute. HEI. 2000. Strategic Plan for the Health Effects of Air Pollution 2000–2005. Cambridge MA: Health Effects Institute:1–26.
  • Institute for European Environment Policy. 2005. Workshop on Best Practices in Analysing and Developing Environmental Policy. 15 November 2005. Brussels: Workshop Report
  • Kirzner, I. 1988. Welfare Economics: A Modern Austrian Perspective. In Man, Economy, and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard. ed. Walter Block and Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. 77-88. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • Kjellstrom, T., Neller, A., and R. W. Simpson. 2002. Air Pollution and Its Health Impacts: The Changing Panorama. Medical Journal of Austria 177 (2): 604-608.
  • Kneese, A., Ayres R.U., and. R. C. Arge. 1973. Economics and the Environment: A Materials Balance Approach. In Pollution, Resources, and the Environment. ed. Alain C. Enthoven. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Krecke, E. 1996. Law and the Market Order: An Austrian Critique of the Economic Analysis of Law. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines 7 (1): 19-37.
  • Lewin, P. 1982. Pollution Externalities, Social Costs and Strict Liability. Cato Journal 2 (1): 205-30.
  • Lord, C. 2003. A Citizens’ Income: A Foundation for a Sustainable World. Charlbury: Jon Carpenter.
  • McGee, R., and W. Block 1994. Pollution Trading Permits as a form of Market Socialism and the Search for a Real Market Solution to Environmental Pollution. Fordham Environmental Law Journal 6: 51-77.
  • McRobie, G. 1981. Small is Possible. England: Abakus.
  • Menger, C. [1870] 1981. Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press.
  • Michael, J. 1993. The Green Economy. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
  • Mill, J. S. 1965. Principal of Political Economy. 2 (3), ed. by J. M. Robson. UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Mises, L. von. [1949] 1998. Human Action. Scholar’s Edition. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  • North, G. 2002. Undermining Property Rights: Coase and Becker. Journal of Libertarian Studies 16 (4): 75-100.
  • Orr, L. D. 1981. Social Costs, Incentive Structures, and Environmental Policies. In Bureaucracy vs. Environment: The Environmental Costs of Bureaucratic Governance. ed. J. Baden and R. Stroup,. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Paul, M. 2005. Energy Beyond Oil, Leicester: Matador.
  • Pearce, D., and K. Turner. 1992. Packaging Waste and the Polluter Pays Principle: A Taxation Solution. Journal of Environmental Management and Planning 35 (1): 5-15.
  • Pigou, A. C. 1956. Memorials of Alfred Marshal, New York: Kelley and Milman.
  • Posner, R. 1973. Economic Analysis of the Law. Boston: Little Brown.
  • Roll, E. 1992. A History of Economic Thought, Fifth edition. England: Faber and Faber.
  • Rothbard, M. [1956] 1977. Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics. New York: Center for Libertarian Studies.
  • Rothbard, M. 1982. Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution. Cato Journal 2 (1): 55-100.
  • Sagoff, M. 1990. The Economy of the Earth. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schumacher, E. F. 1973. Small is Beautiful. England: Abakus.
  • Seethaler, R. K., Kunzli, N., Sommer, H., Chanel, O., Herry, M., Masson, S., Vernaud J-C., Filiger, P., Horak, F. Jr., Kaiser, R., Medina, S., Puybonnieux-Texier, V., Quenel, P., Schneider, J., Studnicka, M., and J. Heldstab. 2003. Economic Costs of Air Pollution Related Health Impacts: An Impact Assessment Project of Austria, France and Switzerland. Clean Air and Environment Quality 37 (1), February 2003: 35-43.
  • Woodin, M., and C. Lucas 2004. Green Alternatives to Globalization: A Manifesto. London: Pluto Press World Health Organization (WHO). 1999. Overview of the Environment and Health in Europe in the 1990s. Third Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health. London, 16-18 June 1999, Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2000a, Quantification of the health effects of exposure to air pollution. Report of a World Health Organization working group, Bilthoven, Netherlands, November.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), 2000b. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe. second edition, WHO Regional Publications, European Series, 91, Geneva.
There are 50 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Dilek Demirbaş

Publication Date December 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 66 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Demirbaş, D. (2016). THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 66(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331663
AMA Demirbaş D. THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. December 2016;66(2):1-29. doi:10.26560/iuifm.331663
Chicago Demirbaş, Dilek. “THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 66, no. 2 (December 2016): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331663.
EndNote Demirbaş D (December 1, 2016) THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 66 2 1–29.
IEEE D. Demirbaş, “THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 1–29, 2016, doi: 10.26560/iuifm.331663.
ISNAD Demirbaş, Dilek. “THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası 66/2 (December 2016), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.26560/iuifm.331663.
JAMA Demirbaş D. THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2016;66:1–29.
MLA Demirbaş, Dilek. “THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH”. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 66, no. 2, 2016, pp. 1-29, doi:10.26560/iuifm.331663.
Vancouver Demirbaş D. THE ECONOMICS OF AIR POLLUTION AND ALTERNATIVE ECONOMIC APPROACHES TO HEALTH. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2016;66(2):1-29.