ITALIAN FEMINIST THOUGHT AT THE PERIPHERY OF THE EMPIRE

Year 2009, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 17 - 35, 03.01.2011

Barbara Dell’abate-çelebi , Barbara Dell

Abstract

İtalyan feminist düşüncesi halihazırda ne uluslararası seviyede, ne de Kadın
Bilimleri Akademiyası nezdinde yüksek bir popülerlik kazanamamış olup,
bunun yerine ancak, İtalyan Feminist Teorisi Uluslararası Edebiyat ve Eleştiri
çevrelerinde kendine sabit bir yer edinmiştir. Bu pek tabii ki, İtalyan
Feminist Düşüncesi’nin kendine özgü üretim ve yayım dağıtımından
kaynaklanan bazı faktörlerle ilgilidir. Ancak, bir başka neden de aslında
İtalyan Feminizminin kendi doğasında yer alan birtakım başka özellikler
olduğu göz ardı edilmemelidir ki, işte bu nedenle bu çalışmanın amacı İtalyan
feminist düşüncesine ve özellikle de ‘cinsel fark kavramına’ genel bir bakış
açısı geliştirip, aynı zamanda uluslararası alandaki görünürlüğüne olumsuz
etki eden öğelere dikkat çekmektir.

Keywords

İtalyan, feminist, düşünce

ITALIAN FEMINIST THOUGHT AT THE PERIPHERY OF THE EMPIRE

Abstract

Italian feminist thought has not reached to-date a great popularity among a
wide international audience nor has gained a recognized standing within the
academic field of Women’s Studies. Instead, Italian feminist theories seem to
have kept a constant marginal role on the international literary and critical
scene. This is certainly the result of a combination of factors related to the
particular way in which Italian feminist thought has been produced and
distributed at international level. However a further cause, intrinsic within the
same nature of Italian feminism, cannot be underestimated. Following this
direction, this article intends to present an overview of the nature of Italian
feminist thought with special attention to the ‘thought of sexual difference’,
highlighting the elements that have negatively influenced its international
visibility.

Keywords

ITALIAN, FEMINIST, PERIPHERY

References

• Bertoletti, Isabella. “Feminist Theory: Italy.” The Feminist Encyclopedia of Italian literature. Ed. Rinaldina Russell. Westport - Connecticut, London: Greenwood Press, 1997.
• Bono, Paola & Sandra Kemp, eds. Italian feminist thought. A reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
• Braidotti, Rosi. Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.
• ---- “Commento alla relazione di Adriana Cavarero”, in La ricerca delle donne. Studi femministi in Italia, eds. Cristina Marcuzzo and Anna Rossi Doria. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier, 1987.
• Cavarero, Adriana. “The Need for a Sexed Thought.” Italian Feminist Thought. A reader. Eds. P. Bono and S. Kemp, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
• Cavarero, Adriana, Franco Restaino, Le filosofie femministe. Due secoli di battaglie teoriche e pratiche, Milano: Bruno Mondadori, 2002.
• Eco, Umberto. Dalla periferia dell’Impero. Milano: Bompiani, 1976. Haste, Helen. “Sexual Metaphors and Current Feminisms.” Feminisms and Women’s Movements in Contemporary Europe. Eds. Anna Bull, Hanna Diamond, and Rosalind Marsh. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.
• Hellman, Judith Adler. “Immigrant ‘Space’ in Italy: When an Emigrant Sending becomes an Immigrant Society”, Modern Italy 1, no.3 (1997): 34-51.
• Lazzaro-Weis, Carol. “The Concept of Difference in Italian Feminist Thought: Mothers, Daughters, Heretics.” Italian Feminist Theory and Practice: Equality and Sexual Difference. Eds. Graziella Parati & Rebecca J. West, Madison, Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002.
• Magli, Patrizia,ed. Le donne e i segni: scrittura, linguaggio, identità nel segno della differenza femminile. Ancona: Il lavoro editoriale, 1988.
• Marsh, Rosalind,ed. Feminisms and Women’s Movements in Contemporary Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.
• Milan Women’s Bookstore Collective. Sexual Difference: A Theory of Social-Symbolic Practice, Trans. Teresa de Lauretis and Patricia Cicogna. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.
• Miller, Nancy. Subject to Change. New York: Columbia University, 1988.
• Muraro, Luisa. L’ordine simbolico della madre. Roma: Editori Riuniti, 1991. Linda J. Nicholson, ed. Feminism/Postmodernism, New York and London: Routledge,1990.
• Parati,Graziella & Rebecca J. West. Italian Feminist Theory and Practice: Equality and Sexual Difference. Madison, Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2002.
• Wendy Pojmann, Immigrant women and feminism in Italy, Aldershot, Burlington: Ashgate, 2006.
• Rasy, Elisabetta. La lingua della nutrice. Percorsi e tracce dell’espressione femminile. Roma:Edizioni delle donne, 1978.
• Scarparo, Susanna. “Feminist Intellectuals as Public Figures in Contemporary Italy.” Australian Feminist Studies 19, no.44 (July 2004): 201-212.
• Sawer, Marian. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1990.
• Showalter, Elaine. “A Criticism of Our Own: Autonomy and Assimilation in Afro-American and Feminist Literary Theory.” Feminisms. Ed. Sandra Kemp & Judith Squires. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
• Violi, Patrizia. L’infinito singolare. Considerazioni sulla differenza sessuale del linguaggio, Verona: Essedue edizioni, 1986.
• Yeatman, Ann. Bureaucrats, Technocrats, Femocrats: Essays on the Contemporary Australian State, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1990.
• Zamboni, Chiara. “Ordine simbolico e ordine sociale”, Oltre l’uguaglianza: le radici femminili dell’autorità, Diotima, Napoli: Liguori, 1995.