Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 199 - 218, 19.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736

Abstract

References

  • Adee, S. (2023, February 12). “Wrap up the best of sci-fi”. New Scientist. 30. google scholar
  • Chaudhary, K. (2013). Elaine Showalter’s Critical Examination of The Essay - “Feminist Criticism In Wilderness”. Research Journal of English Language and Literatüre, 1 (4), 174-177. google scholar
  • Connors, J. (1971). “Do It to Julia”: Thoughts On Orwell’s ‘ 1984. Modern Fiction Studies. 16(4), 463-473. google scholar
  • Dasgupta, N. & Sharma, J. (2013). Anne Sexton’s Poetry Tested on the Axis of Elaine Showalter’s Gynocriticism. The Criterion. 4(3), 1-8. google scholar
  • Donovan, J. (1984). Toward a Women’s Poetics. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 3 (1/2), 98-110. google scholar
  • Ettler, J. (2024, January 6). “How Julia saw life in Orwell’s Dystopia”. The Sydney Morning Herald. 12. google scholar
  • Gardiner, J. K. (1981).On Female Identity and Writing by Women. Critical Inquiry 8(2), 347-361. google scholar
  • Gass, W. H. (1972). Fiction and the Figures of Life. Vintage Books. google scholar
  • Gharachorlou, T.K., & Derabi, J.Y. (2017). “Riding’s poetry in the Theory of Gynocriticism”. Journal of English Language and Literature, 8(2), 627-632. google scholar
  • Greene, G. (1990). Feminist Fiction, Feminist Form. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 11(2/3), 82-88. google scholar
  • Gubar, S. (2014). The Blank Page and the Issues of Female Creativity. Lectora, 20, 249-269. google scholar
  • Hughes, K. (2023, October 1). Big Brother Is Still Watching You. Sunday Times. 31. google scholar
  • Hunt, W. (2013). Orwell’s Commedia: The Ironic Theology of Nineteen Eighty-Four. Modern Philology. 110(4), 536 563. google scholar
  • Jacobs, N. (2007). Dissent, Assent, and the Body in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Utopian Studies, 18(1), 3-20. google scholar
  • Kitch, S. (1987). Feminist Literary Criticism as Irony. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 41(1/2), 7-19. google scholar
  • Lucas, J. M. & Ordeniza, S. (2023). Representation of Women in Literature Through Different Era. Technoarete Transactions on Language and Linguistics. 2(1), 6-10. google scholar
  • Mhamane, N.V. (2021). A Critique of Twentieth Century Feminist Criticism. The Creative Launcher, 6(4). 112-117. google scholar
  • Moi, T. (1988). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Routledge. google scholar
  • Morris, S. (2023, October 20). Literary Fiction. Daily Mail. 35. google scholar
  • Newman, S. (2023). Julia. Granta Books. google scholar
  • Nodeh, S. & Pourgiv, F. (2012). Showalter’s Gynocriticism: Female Wild Zone of Experience in Adrienne Rich’s A google scholar
  • Wild Patience Has Taken Me This Far. The Criterion, 3(4), 1-12. google scholar
  • Orwell, G. (2023). 1984. MK Publications. google scholar
  • Patai, D. (1982). Gamesmanship and Androcentrism in Orwell’s 1984. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 97, 856-870. google scholar
  • Patai, D. (1984). The Orwell Mystique: A Study in Male Ideology. The University of Massachusetts Press. google scholar
  • Philip, M. (2023). “Love, Power, And Control: Exploring the Dynamics Of Relationships In George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”. A Global Journal of Humanities, VI(I), 37-41. google scholar
  • Pratt, A. (1982). Archetypal Patterns in Women’s Fiction. The Harvester Press. google scholar
  • Pujara, T. (2024). Gynocriticism in Snapshots of a Daughter-in-law by Adrienne Rich. Vidhyayana. 9(2), 1252-1259. google scholar
  • Putri, E. J. (2014). Female Experiences in Different Cultural Backgrounds: Gynocriticism on Short Stories of Five Continents. Vivid Journal, 3(1), 1-10. google scholar
  • Rani, S. (2013). Elaine Showalter’s “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness”: A Critique. Research Scholar. 1(4), 1-5. google scholar
  • Rania, K. C. & Latiff, N. (2020). Male is Feminine Under Patriarchal Governments: Male Characters of 1984 by George Orwell. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(4), 900-903. google scholar
  • Selden, R., & Widdowson, P., & Brooker, B. (2005). A Reader’s Guide to Literary Theory. Pearson Education Limited. google scholar
  • Shilling, J. (2024, July 19). Mustreads. Daily Mail. 41. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1977). A Literature of Their Own. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1981). Feminist Criticism in Wilderness. Critical Inquiry, 8(2), 179-205. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1997). Towards a Feminist Poetics. In K. M. Newton (Ed.), Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. St. Martin’s Press. google scholar
  • Xinyue, W. (2021). George Orwell’s Misogyny—A Feminist Interpretation of Animal Farm. US-China Foreign Language. 19(6), 153-157. google scholar

A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four

Year 2025, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 199 - 218, 19.06.2025
https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736

Abstract

Elaine Showalter believes it is restrictive to read stories about women written by male writers because male-dominated narration is filled with stereotypical representations of women, which consequently maintains the victimization of women. With her idea of gynocriticism, she refers to the need for female writers to write about the female. In that sense, she demands female characters to be put at the centre of literary works in order to reach a more inclusive understanding of human experience. Building on her theory of female writing, this paper attempts to show that female experience, perspective, and voice must be communicated within the literary landscape to have a better and multifaceted understanding of the lives of women and to fix the misinterpretations of womanhood through the analysis of Julia (2023) by Sandra Newman and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) by George Orwell. Even though Orwell manages to critique the horrible outcomes of totalitarianism in his canonical dystopia through his protagonist Winston, he completely ignores what Julia feels, thinks, or experiences. There is not much information about Julia’s life as an individual or as a woman. Therefore, Newman reconstructs Julia as the protagonist of her dystopia by focusing solely on Julia’s thoughts, endeavours, and emotions by filling in the missing parts that Orwell does not touch upon. Accordingly, this paper examines how a female writer establishes a society that is not solely governed by universally accepted maledominated ideals, creating a space for a formerly silenced and decentralised character so that she can be valued on her own terms.

References

  • Adee, S. (2023, February 12). “Wrap up the best of sci-fi”. New Scientist. 30. google scholar
  • Chaudhary, K. (2013). Elaine Showalter’s Critical Examination of The Essay - “Feminist Criticism In Wilderness”. Research Journal of English Language and Literatüre, 1 (4), 174-177. google scholar
  • Connors, J. (1971). “Do It to Julia”: Thoughts On Orwell’s ‘ 1984. Modern Fiction Studies. 16(4), 463-473. google scholar
  • Dasgupta, N. & Sharma, J. (2013). Anne Sexton’s Poetry Tested on the Axis of Elaine Showalter’s Gynocriticism. The Criterion. 4(3), 1-8. google scholar
  • Donovan, J. (1984). Toward a Women’s Poetics. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 3 (1/2), 98-110. google scholar
  • Ettler, J. (2024, January 6). “How Julia saw life in Orwell’s Dystopia”. The Sydney Morning Herald. 12. google scholar
  • Gardiner, J. K. (1981).On Female Identity and Writing by Women. Critical Inquiry 8(2), 347-361. google scholar
  • Gass, W. H. (1972). Fiction and the Figures of Life. Vintage Books. google scholar
  • Gharachorlou, T.K., & Derabi, J.Y. (2017). “Riding’s poetry in the Theory of Gynocriticism”. Journal of English Language and Literature, 8(2), 627-632. google scholar
  • Greene, G. (1990). Feminist Fiction, Feminist Form. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 11(2/3), 82-88. google scholar
  • Gubar, S. (2014). The Blank Page and the Issues of Female Creativity. Lectora, 20, 249-269. google scholar
  • Hughes, K. (2023, October 1). Big Brother Is Still Watching You. Sunday Times. 31. google scholar
  • Hunt, W. (2013). Orwell’s Commedia: The Ironic Theology of Nineteen Eighty-Four. Modern Philology. 110(4), 536 563. google scholar
  • Jacobs, N. (2007). Dissent, Assent, and the Body in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Utopian Studies, 18(1), 3-20. google scholar
  • Kitch, S. (1987). Feminist Literary Criticism as Irony. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 41(1/2), 7-19. google scholar
  • Lucas, J. M. & Ordeniza, S. (2023). Representation of Women in Literature Through Different Era. Technoarete Transactions on Language and Linguistics. 2(1), 6-10. google scholar
  • Mhamane, N.V. (2021). A Critique of Twentieth Century Feminist Criticism. The Creative Launcher, 6(4). 112-117. google scholar
  • Moi, T. (1988). Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. Routledge. google scholar
  • Morris, S. (2023, October 20). Literary Fiction. Daily Mail. 35. google scholar
  • Newman, S. (2023). Julia. Granta Books. google scholar
  • Nodeh, S. & Pourgiv, F. (2012). Showalter’s Gynocriticism: Female Wild Zone of Experience in Adrienne Rich’s A google scholar
  • Wild Patience Has Taken Me This Far. The Criterion, 3(4), 1-12. google scholar
  • Orwell, G. (2023). 1984. MK Publications. google scholar
  • Patai, D. (1982). Gamesmanship and Androcentrism in Orwell’s 1984. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 97, 856-870. google scholar
  • Patai, D. (1984). The Orwell Mystique: A Study in Male Ideology. The University of Massachusetts Press. google scholar
  • Philip, M. (2023). “Love, Power, And Control: Exploring the Dynamics Of Relationships In George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty-Four”. A Global Journal of Humanities, VI(I), 37-41. google scholar
  • Pratt, A. (1982). Archetypal Patterns in Women’s Fiction. The Harvester Press. google scholar
  • Pujara, T. (2024). Gynocriticism in Snapshots of a Daughter-in-law by Adrienne Rich. Vidhyayana. 9(2), 1252-1259. google scholar
  • Putri, E. J. (2014). Female Experiences in Different Cultural Backgrounds: Gynocriticism on Short Stories of Five Continents. Vivid Journal, 3(1), 1-10. google scholar
  • Rani, S. (2013). Elaine Showalter’s “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness”: A Critique. Research Scholar. 1(4), 1-5. google scholar
  • Rania, K. C. & Latiff, N. (2020). Male is Feminine Under Patriarchal Governments: Male Characters of 1984 by George Orwell. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(4), 900-903. google scholar
  • Selden, R., & Widdowson, P., & Brooker, B. (2005). A Reader’s Guide to Literary Theory. Pearson Education Limited. google scholar
  • Shilling, J. (2024, July 19). Mustreads. Daily Mail. 41. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1977). A Literature of Their Own. Princeton University Press. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1981). Feminist Criticism in Wilderness. Critical Inquiry, 8(2), 179-205. google scholar
  • Showalter, E. (1997). Towards a Feminist Poetics. In K. M. Newton (Ed.), Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. St. Martin’s Press. google scholar
  • Xinyue, W. (2021). George Orwell’s Misogyny—A Feminist Interpretation of Animal Farm. US-China Foreign Language. 19(6), 153-157. google scholar
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects World Languages, Literature and Culture (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sena Önvural 0009-0008-1206-7284

Publication Date June 19, 2025
Submission Date November 3, 2024
Acceptance Date April 17, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 35 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Önvural, S. (2025). A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 35(1), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736
AMA Önvural S. A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera. June 2025;35(1):199-218. doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736
Chicago Önvural, Sena. “A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia As a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35, no. 1 (June 2025): 199-218. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736.
EndNote Önvural S (June 1, 2025) A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35 1 199–218.
IEEE S. Önvural, “A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four”, Litera, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 199–218, 2025, doi: 10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736.
ISNAD Önvural, Sena. “A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia As a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies 35/1 (June2025), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736.
JAMA Önvural S. A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera. 2025;35:199–218.
MLA Önvural, Sena. “A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia As a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four”. Litera: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, 2025, pp. 199-18, doi:10.26650/LITERA2024-1578736.
Vancouver Önvural S. A Gynocritical Analysis of Newman’s Julia as a Response to Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Litera. 2025;35(1):199-218.