BibTex RIS Cite

Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği

Year 2005, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 151 - 162, 19.03.2012

Funda Bilim Abdullah Ateş

Abstract

Comparison of Analytic Signal Methods on Magnetic Model Data and Field Example

Keywords

Manyetik alan anomalisi Yatay ve düşey türev Analitik sinyal yöntemleri

References

  • Baldwin, R.T., and Langel, R., 1993, Tables and Maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, Internat Union of Geodesy and Geophysical Assoc. of Geomagnetic and Aeronomy, IAGA Bulletin, 54, 158.
  • Bilim, F. And Ates, A., 2003, Analytic signal inferred from reduced to the pole data, J.of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 6, 66-74.
  • Bingöl, E., 1989, Türkiye jeoloji haritası, 1/2000000, MTA yayını, Ankara.
  • Blakely, R.J. and Simpson, R.W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Gephysics 51, 1494-1498.
  • Blakely, R., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Camb. Univ. P. New York.
  • Bournas ,N. and Baker, H.A., 2001, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the horizontal gradient analytic signal, Annali Di Geofisica 44, 505-526.
  • Fedi, M. and Florio, G., 2001, Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method, Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 40-58.
  • Goodacre, A.K., 1973, Some comments on the Calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism, Geophys. Prosp. 21, 66-69.
  • Hsu, S-K., Sibuet, J-C. and Shyu, C-T., 1996, High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique, Geophysics, 61, 373-389.
  • Jeng, Y., Lee Y-L., Chen, C-Y. and Lin, M-J., 2003, Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology, J. of Appl. Geop. 53, 31-48.
  • Kadioglu, Y.K., Ates, A. and Gülec, N., 1998, Structural interpretation of gabbroic rocks in Agaçören Granitoid, Central Turkey: field observations and aeromagnetic data. Geol. Mag., 135, 245-254.
  • Kearey, P., 1977, Computer program "prism" to compute gravity and magnetic anomalies of right rectangular prism. University of Bristol, England (yayınlanmadı).
  • Mohan N.L. and Anand Babu, L., 1995, An analysis of 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 60, 531-536.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophysics, 39, 85-92.
  • Nabighian, M.N. 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  • Reid, A.B., Allsop, J.M., Granser, H., Millett, A.J. and Somerton, I.W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
  • Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M. 1992, Magnetic interpretation using 3D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
  • Spector, A. and Grant, F.S. 1970, Statistical models for interpretation aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
  • Thompson, D.T. 1982, EULDPH: A new tecnique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, 31-3

Year 2005, Volume: 18 Issue: 2, 151 - 162, 19.03.2012

Funda Bilim Abdullah Ateş

Abstract

References

  • Baldwin, R.T., and Langel, R., 1993, Tables and Maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, Internat Union of Geodesy and Geophysical Assoc. of Geomagnetic and Aeronomy, IAGA Bulletin, 54, 158.
  • Bilim, F. And Ates, A., 2003, Analytic signal inferred from reduced to the pole data, J.of the Balkan Geophysical Society, 6, 66-74.
  • Bingöl, E., 1989, Türkiye jeoloji haritası, 1/2000000, MTA yayını, Ankara.
  • Blakely, R.J. and Simpson, R.W., 1986, Approximating edges of source bodies from magnetic or gravity anomalies, Gephysics 51, 1494-1498.
  • Blakely, R., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Camb. Univ. P. New York.
  • Bournas ,N. and Baker, H.A., 2001, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies using the horizontal gradient analytic signal, Annali Di Geofisica 44, 505-526.
  • Fedi, M. and Florio, G., 2001, Detection of potential fields source boundaries by enhanced horizontal derivative method, Geophysical Prospecting, 49, 40-58.
  • Goodacre, A.K., 1973, Some comments on the Calculation of the gravitational and magnetic attraction of a homogeneous rectangular prism, Geophys. Prosp. 21, 66-69.
  • Hsu, S-K., Sibuet, J-C. and Shyu, C-T., 1996, High resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: An enhanced analytic signal technique, Geophysics, 61, 373-389.
  • Jeng, Y., Lee Y-L., Chen, C-Y. and Lin, M-J., 2003, Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology, J. of Appl. Geop. 53, 31-48.
  • Kadioglu, Y.K., Ates, A. and Gülec, N., 1998, Structural interpretation of gabbroic rocks in Agaçören Granitoid, Central Turkey: field observations and aeromagnetic data. Geol. Mag., 135, 245-254.
  • Kearey, P., 1977, Computer program "prism" to compute gravity and magnetic anomalies of right rectangular prism. University of Bristol, England (yayınlanmadı).
  • Mohan N.L. and Anand Babu, L., 1995, An analysis of 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 60, 531-536.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crosssection: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
  • Nabighian, M.N., 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophysics, 39, 85-92.
  • Nabighian, M.N. 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations, Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  • Reid, A.B., Allsop, J.M., Granser, H., Millett, A.J. and Somerton, I.W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler deconvolution, Geophysics, 55, 80-91.
  • Roest, W.R., Verhoef, J. and Pilkington, M. 1992, Magnetic interpretation using 3D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116-125.
  • Spector, A. and Grant, F.S. 1970, Statistical models for interpretation aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 22, 359-383.
  • Thompson, D.T. 1982, EULDPH: A new tecnique for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data, Geophysics, 47, 31-3
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Funda Bilim This is me

Abdullah Ateş This is me

Publication Date March 19, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 18 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Bilim, F., & Ateş, A. (2012). Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 18(2), 151-162.
AMA Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. March 2012;18(2):151-162.
Chicago Bilim, Funda, and Abdullah Ateş. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18, no. 2 (March 2012): 151-62.
EndNote Bilim F, Ateş A (March 1, 2012) Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18 2 151–162.
IEEE F. Bilim and A. Ateş, “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği”, İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2012.
ISNAD Bilim, Funda - Ateş, Abdullah. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi 18/2 (March 2012), 151-162.
JAMA Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18:151–162.
MLA Bilim, Funda and Abdullah Ateş. “Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması Ve Arazi Örneği”. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 2, 2012, pp. 151-62.
Vancouver Bilim F, Ateş A. Analitik Sinyal Yöntemlerinin Manyetik Model Verileri Üzerinde Karşılaştırılması ve Arazi Örneği. İstanbul Yerbilimleri Dergisi. 2012;18(2):151-62.